Comparison of Ultrasound, CT, and Classical Methods for Selecting Sizes and Placement of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Tubes
Comparison of Ultrasound and CT-Based Anatomical Measurements with Classical Methods for Predicting Size and Optimal Placement Depth of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes in Thoracic Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigators aimed to compare anatomical measurements obtained using ultrasound and computed tomography with classical methods to select the appropriate size of double-lumen tubes more quickly and easily and to determine the optimal depth of placement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2024
CompletedDecember 12, 2024
December 1, 2024
5 months
December 2, 2024
December 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
malposition
After intubation in all three groups; 1\. The upper teeth level was checked and the cm was recorded. It was checked whether both lungs were equally ventilated with the inspection and auscultation method. First, the tube lumens were clamped on the left side; it was checked whether the right lung was ventilated, then the same procedure was repeated for the right side and noted. Then, both lungs were ventilated with 6-8 ml/kg tidal volume and the airway pressure was recorded. With the help of the clamp, the left side was clamped first, the right lung was ventilated with 4-6 ml/kg tidal volume and the airway pressure was checked. The same procedure was repeated for the other side. It was determined whether there was sufficient isolation according to the difference between the airway pressures and recorded. Isolation criteria: Satisfactory isolation: If the respiratory sounds are clearly heard on the opposite side when one lung is isolated and the airway pressure on the other side increa
10 minutes
Appropriateness of the Selected DLT Size
The selected tube was evaluated to see if it was of appropriate size. Appropriate size: If the double-lumen tube tip entered the left main bronchus and no obvious resistance was encountered and there was no airway leakage and isolation was achieved when the bronchial cuff was inflated with 1-3 ml and the tracheal cuff with 2-6 ml of air, it was accepted that the double-lumen tube was selected in an appropriate size. Large tube: If the double-lumen tube tip could not enter the left main bronchus or was placed in the left main bronchus, but when the bronchial cuff was inflated with less than 1 ml and the tracheal cuff with less than 2 ml of air, pulmonary isolation was achieved and there was no air leakage, it was accepted that it was a large-sized double-lumen tube. Small tube: If the bronchial cuff was inflated with more than 3 ml and the tracheal cuff with more than 6 ml of air, pulmonary isolation was achieved and there was no air leakage, it was accepted that it was a small-size
10 minutes
Appropriateness of Double-Lumen Tube Placement
While the patient was in the supine position, the location of the tube was checked with fiber optic bronchoscopy. It was noted whether the tube was in its optimum location. If not, how many cm it should be advanced or retracted for its optimum location.
10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Subglottic resistance
10 minutes
Petechiae
10 minutes
Hoarseness
24 hours
Throat Pain
24 hours
Study Arms (3)
Classical group
In the classical group, Double Lumen Tube selection was based on gender and height. For males, a 41 F tube was chosen if height \>170 cm, and a 39 F tube if height ≤170 cm. For females, a 37 F tube was used if height \>160 cm, and a 35 F tube if height ≤160 cm. The depth was determined using the formula: 12 + (patient height/10). The calculated depth was marked on the DLT, and after intubation, the mark was positioned at the level of the upper teeth.
Ultrasonography group
In the Ultrasonography (USG) group, Double Lumen Tube selection was based on the transverse cricoid cartilage diameter measured preoperatively using ultrasound. A 41 F tube was selected if the cricoid diameter was ≥18 mm, 39 F for 16-17.9 mm, 37 F for 15-15.9 mm, 35 F for 13-14.9 mm, and 32 F for \<13 mm (Table 5) (5). To determine placement depth, the distance between the vocal cords and the Louis angle was measured (the Louis angle was used as a guide as it anatomically aligns with the carina). The position of the vocal cords was identified using USG. The measured length was marked starting from the bronchial cuff line, and this mark was positioned at the level of the vocal cords during intubation.
Computed Tomography
In the Computed Tomography (CT) group, Double Lumen Tube selection was based on CT measurements. Radiologists measured the cricoid diameter and the distance between the carina and the vocal cords. A 41 F tube was selected if the cricoid diameter was ≥18 mm, 39 F for 16-17.9 mm, 37 F for 15-15.9 mm, 35 F for 13-14.9 mm, and 32 F for \<13 mm (Table 5) (5). The calculated depth was marked starting from the bronchial cuff line, and this mark was positioned at the level of the vocal cords during intubation.
Interventions
Double-Lumen Tube Intubation
Eligibility Criteria
"A total of 150 patients aged 18-80 years, requiring lung isolation in thoracic surgery, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk score of 1-2-3, who were literate and able to provide informed consent, were included in the study."
You may qualify if:
- Requiring lung isolation in thoracic surgery,
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk score of 1-2-3,
- Patients who are literate and able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with an ASA score of 4 or higher,
- Criteria for difficult intubation,
- Difficulty in mouth opening, small jaw deformities,
- Abnormal cricoid cartilage appearance,
- A history of laryngeal or neck surgery,
- Preoperative throat pain and hoarseness,
- Tumors and deformities in the main airway
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, ÇANKAYA, 06530, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Zhang X, Wang DX, Wei JQ, Liu H, Hu SP. Recent advances in double-lumen tube malposition in thoracic surgery: A bibliometric analysis and narrative literature review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 14;9:1071254. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1071254. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36590949BACKGROUNDChang TR, Yuan MK, Pan SF, Chuang CC, So EC. Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube-Predicting Insertion Depth and Tube Size Based on Patient's Chest X-ray Image Data and 4 Other Body Parameters. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 14;12(12):3162. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123162.
PMID: 36553170BACKGROUNDWoo JH, Cho S, Kim YJ, Kim DY, Choi Y, Lee JW. Depth of double-lumen endobronchial tube: a comparison between real practice and clinical recommendations using height-based formulae. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023 Jan;18(1):37-45. doi: 10.17085/apm.22214. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
PMID: 36746900BACKGROUNDShiqing L, Wenxu Q, Yuqiang M, Youjing D. Predicting the Size of a Left Double-Lumen Tube for Asian Women Based on the Combination of the Diameters of the Cricoid Ring and Left Main Bronchus: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2020 Mar;130(3):762-768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003839.
PMID: 30286004BACKGROUNDBrodsky JB, Macario A, Mark JB. Tracheal diameter predicts double-lumen tube size: a method for selecting left double-lumen tubes. Anesth Analg. 1996 Apr;82(4):861-4. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199604000-00032. No abstract available.
PMID: 8615510BACKGROUNDEldawlatly AA. Double lumen tube: Size and insertion depth. Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Jul-Sep;15(3):280-282. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_192_21. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
PMID: 34764835BACKGROUNDLiu Z, Zhao L, Jia Q, Yang X, Liang SJ, He W. Chest Computed Tomography Image for Accurately Predicting the Optimal Insertion Depth of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Tube. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):855-859. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.09.025. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
PMID: 29221981BACKGROUNDZhang C, Qin X, Zhou W, He S, Liu A, Zhang Y, Dai Z, Yin J. Prediction of Left Double-Lumen Tube Size by Measurement of Cricoid Cartilage Transverse Diameter by Ultrasound and CT Multi-Planar Reconstruction. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 16;8:657612. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.657612. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34222278BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
SUMRU ŞEKERCİ, PROF
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2024
First Posted
December 12, 2024
Study Start
October 20, 2023
Primary Completion
March 20, 2024
Study Completion
March 25, 2024
Last Updated
December 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share