Comparative Study of USG Guided ESPB vs USG Guided PVB For Post-op Analgesia In Patient's After Open Renal Surgeries
Comparative Study of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Ultrasound Guided Paravertebral Block For Post-oprative Analgesia In Patient's After Open Renal Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain control following open renal surgeries are of utmost importance in order to reduce the chance of chronic pain development, and facilitate early rehabilitation. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a recently developed regional anaesthesia procedure successfully used for different types of surgical procedures including open renal surgeries. A Comparative cross-sectional study design will be used and patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be included that are admitted through the Outpatient department. Patients will be optimized for surgery. A detailed history will be taken regarding the mode of injury, any preexisting disease and previous surgery and finally thorough examination of the patient will be done to rule out any systemic disease. Informed consent will be taken. These patients will be divided into 2 groups by simple lottery method in group A and B.All the data collected will be entered and analyzed by SPSS version 25.0. Age, surgery d.uration, intraoperative heart rate, intraoperative MAP, total postoperative opioid consumption, total intraoperative opiod and isoflurane consumption, time to first required analgesic, and VAS during the first postoperative 24 h will be summarized, according to normality, into mean (± standard deviation \[SD\]) or median (range). According to data normality, the hypothesis of significant differences between the two studied groups will be challenged using the one-way analysis of variance (with least significant difference correction) or Kruskal-Wallis tests (VAS). Moreover, a p value of \< 0.05 will be regarded to be statistically significant
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 11, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2024
CompletedMay 4, 2026
April 1, 2026
6 months
September 29, 2024
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post Op Analgesia
Duration of post op analgesia.
From performance of block to first rescue analgesia in 24 hours post operatively.
Study Arms (2)
GROUP-ESPB
EXPERIMENTALErector spinae plane block
GROUP-PVB
EXPERIMENTALPara vertebral block
Interventions
In ESPB technique the linear transducer will be placed over the spinous process of the vertebra and a point 3 cm lateral to it are marked at the T10-T11 level before performing the block. Under aseptic precautions, the 23G spinal needle is inserted and advanced perpendicular to the skin in all planes to contact the transverse process of the vertebra. The transverse process of the thoracic vertebra lies at a variable depth of 2-4 cm from the skin depending on the build of the individual. At this point, the needle tip lies between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process. After negative aspiration, local anesthetic is injected in 3-5 ml aliquots. A volume of 20-25 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be used for analgesia on each side depending upon the surgery and requirements. The number of attempts will be noted.Time taken to perform block in minutes will be noted from placing transducer to taking out needle after injecting drug in plane.
In PVB technique the patient will be placed in the lateral position, and the superior aspect of the T9,T10 and T11 spinous processes will be identified. Under complete aseptic precautions and after skin infiltration with LA, 23G spinal needle will be inserted perpendicular to the skin, with the goal of contacting the tranverse process. Once the TP is contacted, generally at a depth of 2 to 5 cm in adults, the needle is withdrawn into the subcutaneous tissue, redirected in a caudal direction, and then slowly advanced with the purpose of entering the PVS at an approximate depth of 1.0 to 1.5 cm past the initial contact with the TP. After perforating the costotransverse ligament and negative aspiration for blood, air, or spinal fluid,10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected at each level superficial to to the pleural line. Displacement of the pleura line anteriorly will be confirmed proper injection of the local anaesthetic solution. The number of attempts will be noted.
Inj Bupivacaine 0.25% (10ml) in both groups
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both Genders
- Age between 18 years to 60 years.
- BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2
- ASA I or ASA II
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who do not give consent.
- Relevant drug allergy.
- Pregnancy
- Alcohol or drug abuse.
- Infection at the site of injection.
- Taking of pain medications within 24 h before surgery.
- Chronic hepatic or renal failure.
- Deranged coagulation profile
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sahiwal medical college sahiwallead
- Department of medical educationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sahiwal Medical College,Sahiwal
Sahiwal, Punjab Province, 57000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Adeel Riaz, MD
Sahiwal Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Anaesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2024
First Posted
December 11, 2024
Study Start
January 11, 2024
Primary Completion
July 9, 2024
Study Completion
August 9, 2024
Last Updated
May 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- August 2024
- Access Criteria
- On Demand
Data will be available on request