NCT06726135

Brief Summary

Several rehabilitation datasets are presently in use for specific patient groups in England. The 'National Clinical Audit of Specialist Rehabilitation for patients with complex needs following major injury' (NCASRI) evaluated outcomes within a cohort of Major Trauma patients between 2015 and 2018 using data from two of these datasets. The NCASRI project outlined some of the shortcomings of the pre-existing datasets and highlighted the need for a single National Rehabilitation Dataset to provide long term evaluation of a variety of patient presentations. The proposed study will seek to develop such a dataset by means of an E-delphi study. This study will seek consensus from a panel of experts on the data items required to measure the effectiveness and socio-economic impact of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. Providing commissioners, researchers and clinicians with the data required to improve patient care, conduct research and develop rehabilitation services. There are three potential phases to this study:

  • Phase one involves the establishment of a core domain set, outlining what information (data) should be included in the NRC core dataset.
  • Phase one will consist of at least 2 rounds of voting, with successive rounds of voting undertaken until an a-priori consensus of 70% is reached for all core data items marked as mandatory/critical data in fitting OMERACT guidelines.
  • After 2 rounds, any data item that have reached consensus will be included in the final dataset. These core domain (data items) will then be excluded from subsequent rounds of voting.
  • A maximum of 4 rounds will be allowed in Phase 1. At which point the highest-ranking data items remaining with a consensus above 60% from each of the pre-identified categories will be included in the final dataset.
  • Phase two will explore what tools should be used to collect the core domains (outcome measure instruments) for each category outlined in phase 1.
  • Phase 2 will follow the same protocol for including outcome measure instruments into the core outcome set as were required to include core data items from phase 1.
  • If a consensus of equal or greater than 60% cannot be reached using an E-Delphi method in either phase 1 or phase 2 then a virtual meeting will be held amongst all expert panel members to reach consensus using a nominal group technique (phase 3).

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 5, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 10, 2024

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

E-delphiDelphiMultidisciplinaryRehabilitationCore outcome setDatasetnational rehabilitation centreoutcome measure instrumentsinpatient

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for rehabilitation to be used as the foundation of the National Rehabilitation Centre Dataset.

    The core outcome set (Primary outcome) will include core data Items centered on 6 key themes: 1. Demographic variables 2. Health indicators and associated outcome measures 3. Socio-economic variables (healthcare costs, salary etc.) 4. Service delivery/care pathway variables (admission, transfer and discharge dates/locations etc.) 5. Information associated with previous social function, employment and education and return to these activities following their injury/illness. 6. Injury/condition-specific data Each data item will include details regarding how this item will be measured

    From enrolment to conclusion of the stufy (6 months)

Other Outcomes (1)

  • To develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for rehabilitation to be used as the foundation of the National Rehabilitation Centre Dataset.

    From enrolment to conclusion of the study (6 months)

Study Arms (1)

Experts in the field of rehabilitation with knowledge in outcome monitoring and service evaluation

This study has one study cohort, consisting of a diverse panel of expert clinicians, researchers and managers from a variety of professional backgrounds. These study participants will be purposefully selected based on their knowledge of which demographic, socio-economic and healthcare related variables, as well as any associated outcome measure instruments should be collected as part of a rehabilitation dataset to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The expert panel (study participants) will include clinicians, researchers and managers from a variety of fields. These experts will be purposefully selected based on their knowledge of how best to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost efficiency of inpatient rehabilitation services. This knowledge will include an understanding of which outcome measure instruments are most appropriate to monitor patients' health, social and economic outcomes and what demographic and socio-economic variables are important to record. The expert panel will have experience treating the cohort of patients that the National Rehabilitation Centre (NRC) will support or have experience developing trauma / rehabilitation registries.

You may qualify if:

  • The panel will aim to include clinicians with a minimum of 5 years' experience from a variety of professional backgrounds within the following specialist areas:
  • Neuro Rehab
  • Trauma Rehab
  • Community Rehab
  • Outpatient Rehabilitation services
  • Defence medical services
  • Psychology services
  • Amputee Rehab
  • Speech and Language therapy
  • Emergency department
  • Critical Care
  • Trauma and Orthopaedics
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • It is expected that the expert panel will include:
  • Medical Doctors
  • +12 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals will be excluded from the expert panel for any of the following reasons:
  • They do not have 5 years' experience in their specialist field
  • They do not have an understanding of various health indicators and the appropriate outcome measure instruments required to evaluate these health indicators.
  • They have no understanding of how demographic and socio-economic variables impact health outcomes
  • They have no understanding of how to evaluate clinical effectiveness and cost efficiency of inpatient rehabilitation services.
  • Their professional background is not represented in the above noted specialist areas

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (18)

  • Young AM, Chung H, Chaplain A, Lowe JR; STARS Rehabilitation Dataset Development Group; Wallace SJ. Development of a minimum dataset for subacute rehabilitation: a three-round e-Delphi consensus study. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 25;12(3):e058725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058725.

    PMID: 35338067BACKGROUND
  • Hernandez-Segura N, Marcos-Delgado A, Pinto-Carral A, Fernandez-Villa T, Molina AJ. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Instruments and Mobility: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16493. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416493.

    PMID: 36554369BACKGROUND
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

    PMID: 21479777BACKGROUND
  • Cieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sorensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, Campbell R, Kovindha A, Ring H, Sinnott A, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord. 2010 Apr;48(4):305-12. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.183. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

    PMID: 20065984BACKGROUND
  • Fresk M, Grooten WJA, Brodin N, Backlund LG, Arrelov B, Skaner Y, Kiessling A. Mapping information regarding the work-related disability of depression and long-term musculoskeletal pain to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and ICF Core Sets. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 May 2;4:1159208. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1159208. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 37200737BACKGROUND
  • Cieza A, Stucki G, Weigl M, Kullmann L, Stoll T, Kamen L, Kostanjsek N, Walsh N. ICF Core Sets for chronic widespread pain. J Rehabil Med. 2004 Jul;(44 Suppl):63-8. doi: 10.1080/16501960410016046.

    PMID: 15370750BACKGROUND
  • Oral A, Kiekens C, DE Vriendt P, Satink T, VAN DE Velde D, Grazio S, Moslavac S, Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanic T, Vlak T, Kontaxakis A, Rapidi CA, Pyrgeli M, Stavrianou A, Kujawa J, Tederko P, Kucukdeveci AA, Sezgin M, Zampolini M, Stucki G, Selb M. Development of simple descriptions of the ICF Generic-30 Set in different languages: laying the foundation for an ICF-based clinical tool for Europe. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):271-283. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07932-7. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

    PMID: 37083101BACKGROUND
  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15621359BACKGROUND
  • Beiderbeck D, Frevel N, von der Gracht HA, Schmidt SL, Schweitzer VM. Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements. MethodsX. 2021 May 28;8:101401. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101401. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34430297BACKGROUND
  • Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, Moher D, Schmitt J, Tugwell P, Tunis S, Williamson PR. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement. PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002148. eCollection 2016 Oct.

    PMID: 27755541BACKGROUND
  • Kirkham JJ, Davis K, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Tunis S, Williamson PR. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations. PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 16;14(11):e1002447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002447. eCollection 2017 Nov.

    PMID: 29145404BACKGROUND
  • Schmitt J, Apfelbacher C, Spuls PI, Thomas KS, Simpson EL, Furue M, Chalmers J, Williams HC. The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Jan;135(1):24-30. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.320. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

    PMID: 25186228BACKGROUND
  • Boers M, Kirwan JR, Wells G, Beaton D, Gossec L, d'Agostino MA, Conaghan PG, Bingham CO 3rd, Brooks P, Landewe R, March L, Simon LS, Singh JA, Strand V, Tugwell P. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):745-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.013. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

    PMID: 24582946BACKGROUND
  • Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116. eCollection 2021 Jul 20.

    PMID: 34322364BACKGROUND
  • Gattrell WT, Logullo P, van Zuuren EJ, Price A, Hughes EL, Blazey P, Winchester CC, Tovey D, Goldman K, Hungin AP, Harrison N. ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Med. 2024 Jan 23;21(1):e1004326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326. eCollection 2024 Jan.

    PMID: 38261576BACKGROUND
  • NCASRI Project team, Lead: Turner-Stokes L., 'Specialist Rehabilitation following major Injury (NCASRI) Final Audit report'.

    BACKGROUND
  • Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR, Terwee CB. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016 Sep 13;17(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2.

    PMID: 27618914BACKGROUND
  • Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, Clarke M, Gargon E, Gorst S, Harman N, Kirkham JJ, McNair A, Prinsen CAC, Schmitt J, Terwee CB, Young B. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(Suppl 3):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4.

    PMID: 28681707BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainBrain Injuries, TraumaticMultiple SclerosisSpinal Cord InjuriesConversion Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBrain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesDemyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesSpinal Cord DiseasesSomatoform DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Thomas Corbett, MSc

    Research at the National Rehabilitation Centre (part of Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
6 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2024

First Posted

December 10, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

June 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share