The NRC Dataset. Developing a Minimum Dataset for Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation: a Modified E-Delphi Study
The National Rehabilitation Centre Dataset. Development of a Minimum Dataset for Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation: a Modified E-Delphi Study
1 other identifier
observational
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Several rehabilitation datasets are presently in use for specific patient groups in England. The 'National Clinical Audit of Specialist Rehabilitation for patients with complex needs following major injury' (NCASRI) evaluated outcomes within a cohort of Major Trauma patients between 2015 and 2018 using data from two of these datasets. The NCASRI project outlined some of the shortcomings of the pre-existing datasets and highlighted the need for a single National Rehabilitation Dataset to provide long term evaluation of a variety of patient presentations. The proposed study will seek to develop such a dataset by means of an E-delphi study. This study will seek consensus from a panel of experts on the data items required to measure the effectiveness and socio-economic impact of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. Providing commissioners, researchers and clinicians with the data required to improve patient care, conduct research and develop rehabilitation services. There are three potential phases to this study:
- Phase one involves the establishment of a core domain set, outlining what information (data) should be included in the NRC core dataset.
- Phase one will consist of at least 2 rounds of voting, with successive rounds of voting undertaken until an a-priori consensus of 70% is reached for all core data items marked as mandatory/critical data in fitting OMERACT guidelines.
- After 2 rounds, any data item that have reached consensus will be included in the final dataset. These core domain (data items) will then be excluded from subsequent rounds of voting.
- A maximum of 4 rounds will be allowed in Phase 1. At which point the highest-ranking data items remaining with a consensus above 60% from each of the pre-identified categories will be included in the final dataset.
- Phase two will explore what tools should be used to collect the core domains (outcome measure instruments) for each category outlined in phase 1.
- Phase 2 will follow the same protocol for including outcome measure instruments into the core outcome set as were required to include core data items from phase 1.
- If a consensus of equal or greater than 60% cannot be reached using an E-Delphi method in either phase 1 or phase 2 then a virtual meeting will be held amongst all expert panel members to reach consensus using a nominal group technique (phase 3).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 19, 2024
December 1, 2024
5 months
December 5, 2024
December 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for rehabilitation to be used as the foundation of the National Rehabilitation Centre Dataset.
The core outcome set (Primary outcome) will include core data Items centered on 6 key themes: 1. Demographic variables 2. Health indicators and associated outcome measures 3. Socio-economic variables (healthcare costs, salary etc.) 4. Service delivery/care pathway variables (admission, transfer and discharge dates/locations etc.) 5. Information associated with previous social function, employment and education and return to these activities following their injury/illness. 6. Injury/condition-specific data Each data item will include details regarding how this item will be measured
From enrolment to conclusion of the stufy (6 months)
Other Outcomes (1)
To develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for rehabilitation to be used as the foundation of the National Rehabilitation Centre Dataset.
From enrolment to conclusion of the study (6 months)
Study Arms (1)
Experts in the field of rehabilitation with knowledge in outcome monitoring and service evaluation
This study has one study cohort, consisting of a diverse panel of expert clinicians, researchers and managers from a variety of professional backgrounds. These study participants will be purposefully selected based on their knowledge of which demographic, socio-economic and healthcare related variables, as well as any associated outcome measure instruments should be collected as part of a rehabilitation dataset to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation.
Eligibility Criteria
The expert panel (study participants) will include clinicians, researchers and managers from a variety of fields. These experts will be purposefully selected based on their knowledge of how best to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost efficiency of inpatient rehabilitation services. This knowledge will include an understanding of which outcome measure instruments are most appropriate to monitor patients' health, social and economic outcomes and what demographic and socio-economic variables are important to record. The expert panel will have experience treating the cohort of patients that the National Rehabilitation Centre (NRC) will support or have experience developing trauma / rehabilitation registries.
You may qualify if:
- The panel will aim to include clinicians with a minimum of 5 years' experience from a variety of professional backgrounds within the following specialist areas:
- Neuro Rehab
- Trauma Rehab
- Community Rehab
- Outpatient Rehabilitation services
- Defence medical services
- Psychology services
- Amputee Rehab
- Speech and Language therapy
- Emergency department
- Critical Care
- Trauma and Orthopaedics
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- It is expected that the expert panel will include:
- Medical Doctors
- +12 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals will be excluded from the expert panel for any of the following reasons:
- They do not have 5 years' experience in their specialist field
- They do not have an understanding of various health indicators and the appropriate outcome measure instruments required to evaluate these health indicators.
- They have no understanding of how demographic and socio-economic variables impact health outcomes
- They have no understanding of how to evaluate clinical effectiveness and cost efficiency of inpatient rehabilitation services.
- Their professional background is not represented in the above noted specialist areas
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ThomasCorbettlead
- Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trustcollaborator
Related Publications (18)
Young AM, Chung H, Chaplain A, Lowe JR; STARS Rehabilitation Dataset Development Group; Wallace SJ. Development of a minimum dataset for subacute rehabilitation: a three-round e-Delphi consensus study. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 25;12(3):e058725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058725.
PMID: 35338067BACKGROUNDHernandez-Segura N, Marcos-Delgado A, Pinto-Carral A, Fernandez-Villa T, Molina AJ. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Instruments and Mobility: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16493. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416493.
PMID: 36554369BACKGROUNDHerdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
PMID: 21479777BACKGROUNDCieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sorensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, Campbell R, Kovindha A, Ring H, Sinnott A, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord. 2010 Apr;48(4):305-12. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.183. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
PMID: 20065984BACKGROUNDFresk M, Grooten WJA, Brodin N, Backlund LG, Arrelov B, Skaner Y, Kiessling A. Mapping information regarding the work-related disability of depression and long-term musculoskeletal pain to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and ICF Core Sets. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 May 2;4:1159208. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1159208. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37200737BACKGROUNDCieza A, Stucki G, Weigl M, Kullmann L, Stoll T, Kamen L, Kostanjsek N, Walsh N. ICF Core Sets for chronic widespread pain. J Rehabil Med. 2004 Jul;(44 Suppl):63-8. doi: 10.1080/16501960410016046.
PMID: 15370750BACKGROUNDOral A, Kiekens C, DE Vriendt P, Satink T, VAN DE Velde D, Grazio S, Moslavac S, Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanic T, Vlak T, Kontaxakis A, Rapidi CA, Pyrgeli M, Stavrianou A, Kujawa J, Tederko P, Kucukdeveci AA, Sezgin M, Zampolini M, Stucki G, Selb M. Development of simple descriptions of the ICF Generic-30 Set in different languages: laying the foundation for an ICF-based clinical tool for Europe. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):271-283. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07932-7. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
PMID: 37083101BACKGROUNDDworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.
PMID: 15621359BACKGROUNDBeiderbeck D, Frevel N, von der Gracht HA, Schmidt SL, Schweitzer VM. Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements. MethodsX. 2021 May 28;8:101401. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101401. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34430297BACKGROUNDKirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, Moher D, Schmitt J, Tugwell P, Tunis S, Williamson PR. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement. PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002148. eCollection 2016 Oct.
PMID: 27755541BACKGROUNDKirkham JJ, Davis K, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Tunis S, Williamson PR. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations. PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 16;14(11):e1002447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002447. eCollection 2017 Nov.
PMID: 29145404BACKGROUNDSchmitt J, Apfelbacher C, Spuls PI, Thomas KS, Simpson EL, Furue M, Chalmers J, Williams HC. The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Jan;135(1):24-30. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.320. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
PMID: 25186228BACKGROUNDBoers M, Kirwan JR, Wells G, Beaton D, Gossec L, d'Agostino MA, Conaghan PG, Bingham CO 3rd, Brooks P, Landewe R, March L, Simon LS, Singh JA, Strand V, Tugwell P. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):745-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.013. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
PMID: 24582946BACKGROUNDNasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116. eCollection 2021 Jul 20.
PMID: 34322364BACKGROUNDGattrell WT, Logullo P, van Zuuren EJ, Price A, Hughes EL, Blazey P, Winchester CC, Tovey D, Goldman K, Hungin AP, Harrison N. ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Med. 2024 Jan 23;21(1):e1004326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326. eCollection 2024 Jan.
PMID: 38261576BACKGROUNDNCASRI Project team, Lead: Turner-Stokes L., 'Specialist Rehabilitation following major Injury (NCASRI) Final Audit report'.
BACKGROUNDPrinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR, Terwee CB. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016 Sep 13;17(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2.
PMID: 27618914BACKGROUNDWilliamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, Clarke M, Gargon E, Gorst S, Harman N, Kirkham JJ, McNair A, Prinsen CAC, Schmitt J, Terwee CB, Young B. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(Suppl 3):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4.
PMID: 28681707BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Corbett, MSc
Research at the National Rehabilitation Centre (part of Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 6 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2024
First Posted
December 10, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share