Comparing of Using Interactive E-books and Traditional Education Methods for Nursing Students and Nursing Staff

NCT06722001 | Not Yet Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: TMU_ebook
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 180
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

Cancer-related comorbidities are a major focus of care for medical staff, especially the incidence of "insomnia" in cancer patients should not be underestimated, and the treatment of cancer-related insomnia by clinical medical staff is often limited to verbal instructions and suggestions, lacking routine and a systematic process. Although "Cognitive behavioral treatment for insomnia (CBTI)" is widely used, due to the limitation of personnel and high time cost, later generations improved "Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia (BBTI)", which not only broadens the clinical application but also increases the patient's willingness to cooperate. In recent years, the integration of technology into teaching has become a trend. Among them, interactive e-books are widely used. It not only enhances users' learning motivation and interest but also is effective in building practical confidence. It can also customize course content according to different needs. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of using interactive e-book teaching and traditional teaching methods to learn Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. The object is aimed at nursing students and clinical nurses. An experimental research design is adopted. A total of 165\~180 clinical nurses and university nursing students will be pre-selected and randomly assigned to the control group or the experimental group. The control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia, the subjects needed to fill out the pre-test and post-test questionnaires before and after the experiment to compare the difference in the learning effects of the two groups of subjects, and expect that the group using interactive e-book will have better learning effects and course satisfaction.

Conditions

Efficacy, Self; Satisfaction, Personal

Keywords

Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia; e-book; Insomnia treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

• Cognition knowledge scale

  learning Cognition knowledge outcomes from Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. higher score higher cognition knoeledge.

  change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week

• Confidence scale

  learning Confidence outcomes from Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. higher score higher confidence.

  change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week.

• Satisfied from learning

  learning Satisfaction from Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. higher score higher satisfaction.

  change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week.

Study Arms (2)

Traditional group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The traditional group members will obtain traditional paper leaflets and oral health education.

Behavioral: traditional paper handout

"Brief insomnia intervention" group

EXPERIMENTAL

The "Brief insomnia intervention" group will study the interactive e-book.

Behavioral: The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-book

Interventions

The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-book BEHAVIORAL

The control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia.

"Brief insomnia intervention" group

traditional paper handout BEHAVIORAL

The control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia.

Traditional group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Nursing students older than 20 years old.
• Clinical nurses worked in the hospital more than three months.

You may not qualify if:

• cognitive disabilities
• incomplete behavioral ability

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Taipei Medical University: lead

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Personal Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Central Study Contacts

Tsai-Wei Professor Huang

CONTACT

+886227361661; tsaiwei@tmu.edu.tw

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 22, 2023
• First Posted: December 9, 2024
• Study Start: December 30, 2024
• Primary Completion: February 28, 2025
• Study Completion: February 28, 2025
• Last Updated: December 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share