Continuous vs Bolus Protein (Protein Regimen Outcomes) in Critically Ill Children (Kids In Distress)
PRO-KID
Continuous Versus Bolus Dietary Protein and Nutrition Status in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this intervention study is to evaluate the difference in nutrition status markers (weight and muscle mass) when giving dietary protein by continuous or bolus delivery in critically ill children ages 1-11y. The main questions it aims to answer are: Primary: Bolus protein delivery will lessen the decline in mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) z-score by 0.5 standard deviation in critically ill children aged 1-11y after 1wk. Ultrasound will correlate to MUAC. Secondary: Bolus protein delivery will provide more (grams per day) than when provided continuously, therefore it is more likely to meet the minimum estimated needs. Participants will have daily nutrition intake data collected, and undergo body composition measures (weight, MUAC and ultrasound of the upper thigh muscle) at day of enrollment, and MUAC/Ultrasound on follow up days 3, 5, 7 and 14 after the intervention started.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 12, 2027
February 12, 2026
February 1, 2026
3.2 years
October 25, 2024
February 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mid-upper arm circumference
Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) will be the primary outcome measure with a standard deviation change in z-score of 0.5 being considered significant. The measure (in centimeters) will be assessed against the WHO validated growth standard (for sex and age) and reported as z-score to standardized the measures against the population as a whole.
admission, 7 and 14 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Ultrasound of the Rectus Femoris Quadricep
admission, 7 and 14 days
Study Arms (2)
Continuous protein
ACTIVE COMPARATORContinuous protein arm will have dietary protein supplement mixed into the enteral formula product to be provided around the clock without break.
Bolus protein
EXPERIMENTALBolus protein arm will provide protein powder mixed with water every 4h through syringe. This will be in addition to continuous enteral formula feeding which remains standard of care.
Interventions
Beneprotein powder, a whey-based supplement, will be used in both arms. Intervention dose will be 1g/kg of dietary protein (or 1.2g/kg of the powder), provided to both arms with different modes of delivery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children admitted to PICU over 1 year of age and younger than 11 years of life
- Expected to remain in the pediatric intensive care unit for longer than 72 hours
- Receiving standard pediatric formula via NGT/OGT/GT
You may not qualify if:
- Neuromuscular condition such as muscular dystrophy
- Admitted with home prescription for high dose steroids, receives growth hormone or insulin
- Enteral nutrition is contraindicated or if nutrition requirements are partially/fully met by parenteral nutrition
- Formula delivered into the small bowel (duodenum/jejunum, NJT/GJ)
- Those who require a highly specialized diet (E.g., large burns or metabolic diseases)
- Patients with a cow's milk protein allergy cannot safely receive a whey-based protein supplement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
BC Childrens Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1, Canada
Related Publications (8)
El-Kadi SW, Boutry C, Suryawan A, Gazzaneo MC, Orellana RA, Srivastava N, Nguyen HV, Kimball SR, Fiorotto ML, Davis TA. Intermittent bolus feeding promotes greater lean growth than continuous feeding in a neonatal piglet model. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Oct 1;108(4):830-841. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy133.
PMID: 30239549BACKGROUNDDavis TA, Fiorotto ML, Suryawan A. Bolus vs. continuous feeding to optimize anabolism in neonates. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015 Jan;18(1):102-8. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000128.
PMID: 25474017BACKGROUNDRudar M, Naberhuis JK, Suryawan A, Nguyen HV, Stoll B, Style CC, Verla MA, Olutoye OO, Burrin DG, Fiorotto ML, Davis TA. Intermittent bolus feeding does not enhance protein synthesis, myonuclear accretion, or lean growth more than continuous feeding in a premature piglet model. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Dec 1;321(6):E737-E752. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00236.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
PMID: 34719946BACKGROUNDOng C, Lee JH, Senna S, Chia AZH, Wong JJM, Fortier MV, Leow MKS, Puthucheary ZA. Body Composition and Acquired Functional Impairment in Survivors of Pediatric Critical Illness. Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):e445-e453. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003720.
PMID: 30958426BACKGROUNDOng C, Lee JH, Wong JJM, Leow MKS, Puthucheary ZA. Skeletal Muscle Changes, Function, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Survivors of Pediatric Critical Illness. Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;49(9):1547-1557. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004970.
PMID: 33861558BACKGROUNDValverde Montoro D, Rosa Camacho V, Artacho Gonzalez L, Camacho Alonso JM. Thigh ultrasound monitoring identifies muscle atrophy in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;182(12):5543-5551. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05233-4. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
PMID: 37782351BACKGROUNDHulst JM, Huysentruyt K, Gerasimidis K, Shamir R, Koletzko B, Chourdakis M, Fewtrell M, Joosten KF; Special Interest Group Clinical Malnutrition of ESPGHAN. A Practical Approach to Identifying Pediatric Disease-Associated Undernutrition: A Position Statement from the ESPGHAN Special Interest Group on Clinical Malnutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 May 1;74(5):693-705. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003437. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
PMID: 35258497BACKGROUNDBecker P, Carney LN, Corkins MR, Monczka J, Smith E, Smith SE, Spear BA, White JV; Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Consensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: indicators recommended for the identification and documentation of pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition). Nutr Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;30(1):147-61. doi: 10.1177/0884533614557642. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
PMID: 25422273BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rajavel Elango, PhD
University of British Columbia, Department of Pediatrics
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2024
First Posted
December 6, 2024
Study Start
February 13, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 12, 2027
Last Updated
February 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
At this time we are performing pilot work and have indicated to ethics this was not the intention of this work.