Comparsion Between Intrathecal Fentanyl and Intravenous Nalbuphine As a Postoperative Analgesia in Lower Limb Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Postoperative pain management has been a major challenge and there has been great interest about it ., there have been persistent efforts to bring out the best possible analgesic technique with the least side effects. The popularity of lower limb surgeries owing to its higher incidence, orthopedic and vascular surgerise. Inadequate postoperative pain relief is associated with undesirable side effects resulting in chronic persistent pain, delayed recovery Concern about opioid has powerful effect in relief post operative pain. the aim of this study is to Compare between fentanyl intrathecal and nalbuphine IV as a postoperative analgesia in lower limb surgeries
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2026
CompletedDecember 6, 2024
December 1, 2024
1 year
December 3, 2024
December 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
first request of rescue analgesia
Duration of analgesia until first analgesic request
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
group F
EXPERIMENTALpatients will received intrathecal with dose 10-20ug
group N
EXPERIMENTALNalbuphine will given IV as shot in. Dose 1mg /kg
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- male and female pt between 18 and 600 year
- pt with lower limb surgeries with no. Indication for general anathesia
- patient with no contraindication for spinal anatthesia
You may not qualify if:
- pt who refuses
- pt with hypersensivity to any drug
- pt addicts opiods
- chronic use of opiod
- Inability to comprehend postoperatively the pain assessment scale/neuropsychiatric disorders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Culebras X, Gaggero G, Zatloukal J, Kern C, Marti RA. Advantages of intrathecal nalbuphine, compared with intrathecal morphine, after cesarean delivery: an evaluation of postoperative analgesia and adverse effects. Anesth Analg. 2000 Sep;91(3):601-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200009000-00019.
PMID: 10960384BACKGROUNDPick CG, Paul D, Pasternak GW. Nalbuphine, a mixed kappa 1 and kappa 3 analgesic in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Sep;262(3):1044-50.
PMID: 1326621BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- resident doctor at Anathesia and icu department Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2024
First Posted
December 6, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
February 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12