The Efficacy of Regional Scalp Block in Craniotomy
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the role of scalp nerve block in craniotomy. The primary questions it seeks to answer are: What are the efficacy and safety profiles of scalp nerve block in craniotomy? The anesthesia protocol and monitoring were standardized for all participants. Participants were divided into two groups: the scalp nerve block group and the general anesthesia group. General anesthesia was induced using fentanyl (1-2 mcg/kg), propofol (1-2 mg/kg), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). In the scalp nerve block group, a nerve block was administered using 0.5% ropivacaine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for early_phase_1
Started Oct 2023
Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2024
CompletedDecember 6, 2024
December 1, 2024
2 months
December 2, 2024
December 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total opioid consumption
Opioid used was fentanyl, and it was administered during and post surgery which was measured μg/kg.
From enrollment until 24 hours post craniotomy surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain Scale
0 to 24 hours after surgery
Laboratory Markers
After induction of anesthesia, 6 hours after incision, and 24 hours after surgery.
The patients with PONV
0 to 24 hour after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Standard Treatment with Scalp Nerve Block
EXPERIMENTALGeneral anesthesia induction was performed by administering fentanyl 1-2 mcg/kg, propofol 1-2 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Subsequently, scalp nerve block was performed with 0.5% ropivacaine. During surgery, a sudden rise of heart rate and blood pressure higher than 20% from baseline was considered as pain, and a bolus of fentanyl was administered as rescue analgesia.
Standard Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORGeneral anesthesia induction was performed by administering fentanyl 1-2 mcg/kg, propofol 1-2 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Then, continuous fentanyl infusion as analgesia maintenance as the standard treatment. During surgery, a sudden rise of heart rate and blood pressure higher than 20% from baseline was considered as pain, and a bolus of fentanyl was administered as rescue analgesia.
Interventions
Compared to active comparator arm, the experimental arm received the same procedure except in the analgesia maintenance which was performed by nerve block of the scalp using 0.5% ropivacaine. However, during craniotomy surgery, pain may occur in patients in any arms. This was defined as a sudden rise of heart rate and blood pressure higher than 20% from baseline. In that case, a bolus of fentanyl was administered as rescue analgesia.
Compared to experimental arm, the active comparator arm received the same procedure except in the analgesia maintenance which was performed through continuous fentanyl infusion. However, during craniotomy surgery, pain may occur in patients in any arms. This was defined as a sudden rise of heart rate and blood pressure higher than 20% from baseline. In that case, a bolus of fentanyl was administered as rescue analgesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged \>18 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-III
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≥ 13
- Elective craniotomy
You may not qualify if:
- \- Patients with cardiovascular abnormalities, impaired renal and hepatic function, diabetes mellitus, systemic and/or scalp local infection, and those with a history of current dexamethasone administration
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya
Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
Related Publications (6)
Chen Y, Ni J, Li X, Zhou J, Chen G. Scalp block for postoperative pain after craniotomy: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Front Surg. 2022 Sep 26;9:1018511. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1018511. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36225222BACKGROUNDCostello TG, Cormack JR. Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: a modern approach. J Clin Neurosci. 2004 Jan;11(1):16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2003.09.003. No abstract available.
PMID: 14642359BACKGROUNDBenyahia NM, Verster A, Saldien V, Breebaart M, Sermeus L, Vercauteren M. Regional anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia techniques for spine surgery - a review. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Apr;22(1):25-33.
PMID: 28913452BACKGROUNDVadivelu N, Kai AM, Tran D, Kodumudi G, Legler A, Ayrian E. Options for perioperative pain management in neurosurgery. J Pain Res. 2016 Feb 10;9:37-47. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S85782. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26929661BACKGROUNDGhai B, Jafra A, Bhatia N, Chanana N, Bansal D, Mehta V. Opioid sparing strategies for perioperative pain management other than regional anaesthesia: A narrative review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):3-10. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_362_19. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
PMID: 35706649BACKGROUNDGottschalk A, Berkow LC, Stevens RD, Mirski M, Thompson RE, White ED, Weingart JD, Long DM, Yaster M. Prospective evaluation of pain and analgesic use following major elective intracranial surgery. J Neurosurg. 2007 Feb;106(2):210-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.2.210.
PMID: 17410701BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christijogo Soemartono Waloejo, MD, Ph.D
Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Ph.D
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2024
First Posted
December 6, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 30, 2023
Study Completion
November 30, 2023
Last Updated
December 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12