Prevention of PostAmputation Pain With Targeted Muscle Reinnervation
PreventPAP
1 other identifier
interventional
203
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to compare postamputation pain (phantom limb pain and residual limb pain) one year postoperatively in patients who received a lower extremity amputation (LEA) with standard nerve handling (neurectomy) versus those who received Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR). Patients between 18 and 75 years old, scheduled for an LEA (transfemoral to transtibial) as a primary or secondary sequela of vascular disease, are randomized into standard neurectomy or TMR. TMR is a frequently studied surgical technique and prevents neuroma formation by rerouting a cut mixed nerve end to a functional motor nerve. The investigators hypothesize that TMR during amputation surgery will significant improve PostAmputation Pain (PAP), quality of life, participation in family life and society, and reduction of health-related costs. Participants will be asked to complete multiple online questionnaires postoperatively regarding these outcomes at five evaluation moments (at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 31, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2028
September 19, 2025
September 1, 2025
3 years
July 12, 2024
September 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative residual limb pain
Postoperative residual limb pain will be scored on the 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for 30 consecutive days in a pain diary. A higher score indicates more pain.
at 12 months
Postoperative phantom limb pain
Postoperative phantom limb pain will be scored on the 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for 30 consecutive days in a pain diary. A higher score indicates more pain.
at 12 months
Postoperative pain behavior
Postoperative pain behavior will be scored using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Behavior Short Form 7a. The results will be scored on a scale from 7 to 35 points, with a higher score indicating that pain has a greater influence on behavior.
at 12 months
Postoperative pain interference
Postoperative pain interference will be scored using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form 8a. The results will be scored on a scale from 8 to 40 points, where a higher score indicates greater interference of pain with daily life
at 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Postoperative residual limb pain
at 3, 6, and 9 months
Postoperative phantom limb pain
at 3, 6, and 9 months
Postoperative pain behavior
at 3, 6, and 9 months
Postoperative pain interference
at 3, 6, and 9 months
Neuropathic pain
at 12 months
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Surgical time
at 0 months
Length of hospital stay
at 0 months
Adverse events
30 days postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Standard Neurectomy (control)
OTHERStandard Neurectomy during amputation (control)
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (intervention)
OTHERTargeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) during amputation (intervention)
Interventions
In short: each transected nerve is identified after amputation and is dissected proximally for length. A nerve stimulator is used to identify functional motor nerve branches. Near the point where the motor branch enters the muscle, the motor nerve branch is transected and an end-to-end coaptation is performed with a nearby amputated nerve.
During the amputation a standard neurectomy will be performed based on the surgeons preference. Standard neurectomy will include cutting of the nerve, with or without traction, with or without coagulation, and with or without infiltration with a local anesthetic (i.e., ropivacaine) or phenol. Ligation of the nerve will not be allowed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 18 and 75 years old.
- Scheduled for a transtibial, through-knee, or transfemoral amputation as a primary or secondary sequela of vascular disease.
You may not qualify if:
- Insensate limbs at the level of amputation.
- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.
- Existing neuroma or prior neuroma surgery in the affected limb.
- Undergoing radiotherapy on the affected limb.
- Cognitive impairment, or delirium at the time of consent.
- Patients who are unfit for general anesthesia.
- No nerve surgeon trained in the TMR procedure is available
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Leiden University Medical Centerlead
- Alrijne Hospitalcollaborator
- Medical Center Haaglandencollaborator
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Developmentcollaborator
- UMC Utrechtcollaborator
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)collaborator
- Erasmus Medical Centercollaborator
- Isalacollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
Isala Zwolle
Zwolle, Overijssel, 8025 AB, Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
Alrijne Zorggroep
Leiderdorp, South Holland, 2353 GA, Netherlands
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 GD, Netherlands
Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
The Hague, South Holland, 2512 VA, Netherlands
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
Related Publications (26)
Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
PMID: 11690728BACKGROUNDMioton LM, Dumanian GA, Shah N, Qiu CS, Ertl WJ, Potter BK, Souza JM, Valerio IL, Ko JH, Jordan SW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Residual Limb Pain, Phantom Limb Pain, and Limb Function: A Prospective Study of 33 Major Limb Amputees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2161-2167. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001323.
PMID: 32452928BACKGROUNDDal-Re R, Janiaud P, Ioannidis JPA. Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic? BMC Med. 2018 Apr 3;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1038-2.
PMID: 29615035BACKGROUNDTorrance N, Lawson KD, Afolabi E, Bennett MI, Serpell MG, Dunn KM, Smith BH. Estimating the burden of disease in chronic pain with and without neuropathic characteristics: does the choice between the EQ-5D and SF-6D matter? Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):1996-2004. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
PMID: 25020004BACKGROUNDParsons B, Schaefer C, Mann R, Sadosky A, Daniel S, Nalamachu S, Stacey BR, Nieshoff EC, Tuchman M, Anschel A. Economic and humanistic burden of post-trauma and post-surgical neuropathic pain among adults in the United States. J Pain Res. 2013 Jun 17;6:459-69. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S44939. Print 2013.
PMID: 23825931BACKGROUNDGroffen AJ, Klapwijk T, van Rootselaar AF, Groen JL, Tijssen MA. Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity in sporadic and familial forms of paroxysmal dyskinesia. J Neurol. 2013 Jan;260(1):93-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6592-5. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
PMID: 22752065BACKGROUNDValerio IL, Dumanian GA, Jordan SW, Mioton LM, Bowen JB, West JM, Porter K, Ko JH, Souza JM, Potter BK. Preemptive Treatment of Phantom and Residual Limb Pain with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Mar;228(3):217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
PMID: 30634038BACKGROUNDFrantz TL, Everhart JS, West JM, Ly TV, Phieffer LS, Valerio IL. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation in Traumatic Amputees: Early Experience of an Effective Treatment Strategy to Improve Pain. JB JS Open Access. 2020 May 6;5(2):e0067. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00067. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
PMID: 33123667BACKGROUNDMalessy MJA, de Boer R, Munoz Romero I, Eekhof JLA, van Zwet EW, Kliot M, Dahan A, Pondaag W. Predictive value of a diagnostic block in focal nerve injury with neuropathic pain when surgery is considered. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0203345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203345. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30208078BACKGROUNDDeeyor ST, Kisana HM, Hui CH, Stecher C, Hustedt JW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Does Not Increase the Risk of Postsurgical Complication or Overall Cost. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e4488. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004488. eCollection 2022 Aug.
PMID: 36032374BACKGROUNDSchwingler PM, Moman RN, Hunt C, Ashmore Z, Ogletree SP, Uvodich ME, Murad MH, Hooten WM. Prevalence of postamputation pain and its subtypes: a meta-analysis with meta-regression. Pain Rep. 2021 May 4;6(1):e918. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000918. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33981935BACKGROUNDPoyntz SA, Hacking NM, Dalal M, Fowler S. Peripheral Interventions for Painful Stump Neuromas of the Lower Limb: A Systematic Review. Clin J Pain. 2018 Mar;34(3):285-295. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000533.
PMID: 28678059BACKGROUNDDumanian GA, Potter BK, Mioton LM, Ko JH, Cheesborough JE, Souza JM, Ertl WJ, Tintle SM, Nanos GP, Valerio IL, Kuiken TA, Apkarian AV, Porter K, Jordan SW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):238-246. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003088.
PMID: 30371518BACKGROUNDBerger LE, Shin S, Haffner ZK, Huffman SS, Spoer DL, Sayyed AA, Franzoni G, Bekeny JC, Attinger CE, Kleiber GM. The application of targeted muscle reinnervation in lower extremity amputations: A systematic review. Microsurgery. 2023 Oct;43(7):736-747. doi: 10.1002/micr.31030. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
PMID: 36864779BACKGROUNDWalsh AR, Lu J, Rodriguez E, Diamond S, Sultan SM. The Current State of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Systematic Review. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2023 Mar;39(3):238-244. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755262. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
PMID: 35988579BACKGROUNDChang BL, Hill AL, Mondshine J, Harbour PW, Episalla NC, Attinger CE, Kleiber GM. Primary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Above-Knee Amputations in Patients with Unsalvageable Limbs from Limb-Threatening Ischemia or Infection. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2024 Feb;40(2):109-117. doi: 10.1055/a-2086-0395. Epub 2023 May 4.
PMID: 37142250BACKGROUNDIves GC, Kung TA, Nghiem BT, Ursu DC, Brown DL, Cederna PS, Kemp SWP. Current State of the Surgical Treatment of Terminal Neuromas. Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):354-364. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx500.
PMID: 29053875BACKGROUNDDellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Treatment of the painful neuroma by neuroma resection and muscle implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Mar;77(3):427-38. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198603000-00016.
PMID: 2937074BACKGROUNDAlexander JH, Jordan SW, West JM, Compston A, Fugitt J, Bowen JB, Dumanian GA, Pollock R, Mayerson JL, Scharschmidt TJ, Valerio IL. Targeted muscle reinnervation in oncologic amputees: Early experience of a novel institutional protocol. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;120(3):348-358. doi: 10.1002/jso.25586. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
PMID: 31197851BACKGROUNDO'Brien AL, Jordan SW, West JM, Mioton LM, Dumanian GA, Valerio IL. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Upper-Extremity Amputation for the Treatment of Pain Severity and Symptoms. J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Jan;46(1):72.e1-72.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
PMID: 33268236BACKGROUNDO'Brien AL, West JM, Gokun Y, Janse S, Schulz SA, Valerio IL, Moore AM. Longitudinal Durability of Patient-Reported Pain Outcomes after Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 May 1;234(5):883-889. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000117.
PMID: 35426401BACKGROUNDKang NV, Woollard A, Michno DA, Al-Ajam Y, Tan J, Hansen E. A consecutive series of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) cases for relief of neuroma and phantom limb pain: UK perspective. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):960-969. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.068. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
PMID: 34840118BACKGROUNDCascini S, Agabiti N, Davoli M, Uccioli L, Meloni M, Giurato L, Marino C, Bargagli AM. Survival and factors predicting mortality after major and minor lower-extremity amputations among patients with diabetes: a population-based study using health information systems. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jul;8(1):e001355. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001355.
PMID: 32690575BACKGROUNDGallizzi M, Gagnon C, Harden RN, Stanos S, Khan A. Medication Quantification Scale Version III: internal validation of detriment weights using a chronic pain population. Pain Pract. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00163.x.
PMID: 18211588BACKGROUNDde Bruijn ME, Arts CH, van de Meent H, Frolke JP. Management of the sciatic nerve during transfemoral amputation: a survey of Dutch surgeons. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Aug;61(4):467-470. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10733-1. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
PMID: 30917649BACKGROUNDTendijck GAH, van Schaik J, Dijkman RR, Niesters M, van Zwet EW, van den Hout WB, Ploeg AJ, van Rijt WG, de Ruiter GCW, Coert JH, Duraku LS, Zuidam JM, van de Water W, Pondaag W, van der Krogt H, Groen JL; PreventPAP consortium. Prevention of postamputation pain with targeted muscle reinnervation (PreventPAP trial): protocol for a national, multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Nov 4;15(11):e105053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105053.
PMID: 41248411DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Justus L Groen, MD PhD
Leiden University Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2024
First Posted
December 5, 2024
Study Start
December 31, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Last Updated
September 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- After completion of the study, the key file will be archived in the hospital's study documentation on a protected location on the network hard drive for 15 years in accordance with article 17 of the European good clinical practice directive.
- Access Criteria
- Before acquiring the deidentified individual patient data used in the results of the published work related to this protocol (incl. tables, figures, supplementary files), researcher must sign a data sharing agreement. Data will made available to those who submit a reasonable request with a methodologically sound proposal.
By embracing the FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability of digital assets), we underscore our commitment to robust, transparent, and ethically sound scientific practices that advance research integrity and propel scientific progress. Using the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) Data Management Tool, with support of the LUMC section of Advanced Data Management we ensure that our data is findable, enabling easy discovery through well-structured metadata and standardized identifiers. Through our commitment to accessibility, we guarantee that both researchers and the broader community can access our data with minimal barriers, fostering collaboration and knowledge dissemination. Interoperability remains a focal point, as we structure our data in standardized formats and utilize established vocabularies, facilitating seamless integration with other datasets and tools. Our dedication to reusability ensures that the data generated through our trial