NCT06708819

Brief Summary

Surgery can effectively treat colorectal cancer, but it is a complex procedure with risks and complications. Surgeons often rely on cameras to visually guide their instruments during operations, especially in minimally invasive ("keyhole") and endoscopic procedures. The camera is connected to a computer and generates the internal scene onto a display screen, which the surgeon looks at throughout the procedure, helping them make informed decisions throughout the operation. Fluorescence-guided surgery uses a particular type of camera that can detect images in both normal light and in the near-infrared range. To work, it needs the administration of an agent called indocyanine green to a patient and then the camera can see if the agent is in the tissue of interest to the operation at the time of the surgery. In this way, decisions regarding blood supply ("perfusion") can be helped, especially related to safety in joining together portions of tissue after removal of disease. The equipment and agent are approved for use in this way and have very good safety profiles. Many international studies have already demonstrated that the use of fluorescence-guided surgery is associated with lower rates of leaks when disease bowel segments are removed, and the healthy ends are joined back together. Previous work we have done has shown that sophisticated computing methods can learn to interpret the fluorescence patterns to a similar standard as a surgeon who is very experienced in fluorescence-guided surgery. In this study, we aim to assess whether the computer system we have developed work in real-time, in theatre to provide a reliable interpretation of the fluorescence pattern, that would match how an expert would interpret the same pattern. The system's analysis will not impact on the operation; instead, video images will be recorded, processed and analysed by our computer system. The results of the interpretation will not be shown to the operating surgeon during the procedure to avoid any impact on decision-making.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 26, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 27, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

November 27, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 26, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

FluorescenceIndocyanine GreenArtificial IntelligenceBowel TransectionAnastomotic Leak

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of AI interpretation relative to intra-operative decision made by operating surgeon

    Accuracy of the initial AI-based system, with concurrent development and testing of new AI models using the data generated from participating sites. The performance of the algorithm will be analysed at both object and pixel level. At the object level, accuracy will be assessed based on whether the actual stapler placement by the operating surgeon falls within the boundaries of the "expert" zone predicted by the algorithm. Pixel level analysis will measure the overlap between the predicted and actual zones.

    Within 12 months of study commencement

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Methods to display the information generated from the model to the operating surgeon

    Within 12 months of study commencement

Study Arms (1)

Participants undergoing resection of colorectal disease by segmental resection and anastomosis

Participants will be having indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) performed during their procedure as per routine practice of the operating surgeon. Once presented for ICGFA, with the surgeon's confirmation of the level clinically judged appropriate for transection, the segment(s) of interest is positioned in focus and the recording is begun. ICG is administered and the angiography is interpreted by the operating surgeon to guide the site of transection, which is indicated within the same recording. The video image will be subjected to real-time analysis by the AI model with a representative interpretation of the ICGFA signal generated by the model, however the surgeon will be blinded to this interpretation. The procedure will then continue and conclude as per routine practice.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients with colorectal disease undergoing segmental resection via an open, laparoscopic or robotic approach will be approached for inclusion in the trial. Participants must be able and willing to comply with the terms of the protocol. Such patients will be identified from referral letters, outpatient clinics, endoscopy lists, and multidisciplinary cancer meetings. Patients will undergo standard preoperative work-up, including colonic visualisation by either colonoscopy or CT colonogram, staging CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, MRI of the rectum, and assessment of fitness for surgery as per standard practice. The optimal management of the patient will be determined based on institutional protocols.

You may qualify if:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Aged 18 years or above.
  • Colorectal disease requiring segmental resection with anastomosis.
  • Participant has clinically acceptable laboratory results, including liver function tests.
  • In the Investigator's opinion, is able and willing to comply with all study requirements.
  • Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply:
  • Participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.
  • Significant renal or hepatic impairment.
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
  • Allergy to intravenous contrast agent or indocyanine green.
  • Concurrent use of anticonvulsants, bisulphite containing drugs, methadone and nitrofurantoin.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

Dublin, Ireland

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anastomotic Leak

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ronan Cahill

    Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
90 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2024

First Posted

November 27, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion

January 1, 2026

Study Completion

January 1, 2026

Last Updated

November 27, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Given the sensitive nature of the data being collected (health data) individual participant data will not be shared, in line with GDPR and as described in the patient information leaflet. However, should the algorithm work, the intention is to aggregate the video data sets with further pseudonymisation so that these could then be shared with stakeholders. This would be to help with any future deployment as a medical device to allow what we learn to be put into clinical practice and to answer related new research questions in the future, specifically related to computer vision and AI advancements in the field of surgery and healthcare. These stakeholders include hospital groups, universities and/or industry (including multinational commercial entities). This will only occur with the permission of the research team and principal investigator in keeping with research ethics approval.

Locations