Conventional Therapy vs. Telerehabilitation With TRAK in Patients Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Removal
Comparative Study of the Effectiveness Between Models of Conventional Therapy vs Telerehabilitation With TRAK in Patients Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Removal (Axillary Lymphadenectomy) as Part of Therapy Against Breast Cancer.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of digital physiotherapy via Trak telerehabilitation with conventional home-based exercises in women who have undergone axillary lymph node removal (axillary lymphadenectomy) as part of breast cancer treatment. Researchers will compare the Trak telerehabilitation platform to a standard home exercise protocol to assess the impact on shoulder mobility, treatment adherence, and overall patient satisfaction. Participants will undergo a 4-week home-based rehabilitation using Trak (treatment group) or follow a paper-based exercise protocol (control group) and attend follow-up visits to measure shoulder mobility and any necessary adjustments in treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2026
CompletedMarch 23, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.6 years
November 14, 2024
March 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Shoulder abduction mobility
Active shoulder abduction the patient is able to do actively measurded with a goniometer
2-3 days; 15 days; 4-5 and 14 weeks after the surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Shoulder flexion mobility
2-3 days; 15 days; 4-5 and 14 weeks after the surgery
TRAK designed tool satisfaction questionnaire
14 weeks
Study Arms (2)
TRAK software intervention group
EXPERIMENTALThe patients will undergo 4 weeks of treatment using the TRAK platform for shoulder mobility-oriented exercises.
Paper sheet group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients will undergo 4 weeks of treatment using an exercise paper sheet routine to improve shoulder mobility.
Interventions
Online exercise protocol using the TRAK software. The patient will undergo 4 weeks of an exercise prescription protocol based on shoulder mobility exercises.
Treatment is based on therapeutic exercise following a conventional rehabilitation plan on paper. The patient will undergo 4 weeks of an exercise prescription protocol based on mobility exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients equal to or older than 18 years old.
- Patient undergoing axillary lymph node removal (axillary lymphadenectomy) as part of breast cancer therapy.
- Patients with a tablet, smartphone, or laptop who can use electronic devices (or with family support).
- Patient with an e-mail account (or willing to generate a new one).
- Signed the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with cognitive restriction
- Patient receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (after lymphadenectomy)
- Patient with previous shoulder-limiting pathology (cuff tear, chronic pain, shoulder fracture with sequelae of limited mobility)
- Patient who has undergone previous surgery on the same shoulder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Trak Health Solutions S.L.lead
- Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Donostia University Hospital (HU Donostia, OSI Donostialdea)
Donostia / San Sebastian, Basque Country, 20018, Spain
Related Publications (24)
Singleton AC, Raeside R, Hyun KK, Partridge SR, Di Tanna GL, Hafiz N, Tu Q, Tat-Ko J, Sum SCM, Sherman KA, Elder E, Redfern J. Electronic Health Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 10;40(20):2257-2270. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01171. Epub 2022 May 2.
BACKGROUNDMahmoud IAM Sr. Usability of Telemedicine in Physical Therapy Rehabilitation: Systematic review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Jun 3. doi: 10.2196/25250. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 34287208BACKGROUNDLim JH, Lee HS, Song CS. Home-based rehabilitation programs on postural balance, walking, and quality of life in patients with stroke: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 3;100(35):e27154. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027154.
PMID: 34477171BACKGROUNDChae SH, Kim Y, Lee KS, Park HS. Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Web-Based Upper Limb Home Rehabilitation System Using a Smartwatch and Machine Learning Model for Chronic Stroke Survivors: Prospective Comparative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 9;8(7):e17216. doi: 10.2196/17216.
PMID: 32480361BACKGROUNDBurns DM, Leung N, Hardisty M, Whyne CM, Henry P, McLachlin S. Shoulder physiotherapy exercise recognition: machine learning the inertial signals from a smartwatch. Physiol Meas. 2018 Jul 23;39(7):075007. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aacfd9.
PMID: 29952759BACKGROUNDHosseiniravandi M, Kahlaee AH, Karim H, Ghamkhar L, Safdari R. Home-based telerehabilitation software systems for remote supervising: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Apr;36(2):113-125. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000021. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
PMID: 32151291BACKGROUNDSuso-Marti L, La Touche R, Herranz-Gomez A, Angulo-Diaz-Parreno S, Paris-Alemany A, Cuenca-Martinez F. Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation in Physical Therapist Practice: An Umbrella and Mapping Review With Meta-Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2021 May 4;101(5):pzab075. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab075.
PMID: 33611598BACKGROUNDSotirova MB, McCaughan EM, Ramsey L, Flannagan C, Kerr DP, O'Connor SR, Blackburn NE, Wilson IM. Acceptability of online exercise-based interventions after breast cancer surgery: systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Apr;15(2):281-310. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00931-6. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
PMID: 32930924BACKGROUNDAnton D, Berges I, Bermudez J, Goni A, Illarramendi A. A Telerehabilitation System for the Selection, Evaluation and Remote Management of Therapies. Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 8;18(5):1459. doi: 10.3390/s18051459.
PMID: 29738442BACKGROUNDCramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, Zhou RJ, Chiu NL, Heckhausen J, Cassidy JM, Scacchi W, Smith MT, Barrett AM, Knutson J, Edwards D, Putrino D, Agrawal K, Ngo K, Roth EJ, Tirschwell DL, Woodbury ML, Zafonte R, Zhao W, Spilker J, Wolf SL, Broderick JP, Janis S; National Institutes of Health StrokeNet Telerehab Investigators. Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604.
PMID: 31233135BACKGROUNDAmin J, Ahmad B, Amin S, Siddiqui AA, Alam MK. Rehabilitation Professional and Patient Satisfaction with Telerehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 2;2022:7366063. doi: 10.1155/2022/7366063. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35958819BACKGROUNDMoral-Munoz JA, Zhang W, Cobo MJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Kaber DB. Smartphone-based systems for physical rehabilitation applications: A systematic review. Assist Technol. 2021 Jul 4;33(4):223-236. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1611676. Epub 2019 May 21.
PMID: 31112461BACKGROUNDSeron P, Oliveros MJ, Gutierrez-Arias R, Fuentes-Aspe R, Torres-Castro RC, Merino-Osorio C, Nahuelhual P, Inostroza J, Jalil Y, Solano R, Marzuca-Nassr GN, Aguilera-Eguia R, Lavados-Romo P, Soto-Rodriguez FJ, Sabelle C, Villarroel-Silva G, Gomolan P, Huaiquilaf S, Sanchez P. Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation in Physical Therapy: A Rapid Overview. Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;101(6):pzab053. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab053.
PMID: 33561280BACKGROUNDCheville AL, Moynihan T, Herrin J, Loprinzi C, Kroenke K. Effect of Collaborative Telerehabilitation on Functional Impairment and Pain Among Patients With Advanced-Stage Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 May 1;5(5):644-652. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0011.
PMID: 30946436BACKGROUNDShenoy P, Shenoy P. Identifying the Challenges and Cost-effectiveness of Telerehabilitation: A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2018 12;12:1-4
BACKGROUNDEngstrom LO, Oberg B. Patient adherence in an individualized rehabilitation programme: a clinical follow-up. Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(1):11-8. doi: 10.1080/14034940410028299.
PMID: 15764236BACKGROUNDFong SS, Ng SS, Luk WS, Chung JW, Chung LM, Tsang WW, Chow LP. Shoulder Mobility, Muscular Strength, and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors with and without Tai Chi Qigong Training. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:787169. doi: 10.1155/2013/787169. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
PMID: 23710237BACKGROUNDHarris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
PMID: 18929686BACKGROUNDServicios | EJIE. (s. f.). Basque Administration Web Portal. Recuperado 27 de octubre de 2022, de https://www.ejie.euskadi.eus/infraestructuras//webejie00-contserv/es/
BACKGROUNDRees S, Mazuquin B, Richmond H, Williamson E, Bruce J; UK PROSPER Study Group. Role of physiotherapy in supporting recovery from breast cancer treatment: a qualitative study embedded within the UK PROSPER trial. BMJ Open. 2021 May 11;11(5):e040116. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040116.
PMID: 33980512BACKGROUNDExecutive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2020;53(1):3-19.
PMID: 32521126BACKGROUNDKilbreath SL, Refshauge KM, Beith JM, Ward LC, Lee M, Simpson JM, Hansen R. Upper limb progressive resistance training and stretching exercises following surgery for early breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):667-76. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1964-1.
PMID: 22286332BACKGROUNDLee TS, Kilbreath SL, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Beith JM. Prognosis of the upper limb following surgery and radiation for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Jul;110(1):19-37. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9710-9. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
PMID: 17899373BACKGROUNDEbaugh D, Spinelli B, Schmitz KH. Shoulder impairments and their association with symptomatic rotator cuff disease in breast cancer survivors. Med Hypotheses. 2011 Oct;77(4):481-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.06.015. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
PMID: 21764521BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mikel Zabaleta Sistiaga
Donostia University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The study will not be blinded to patients because masking the use of an application is impossible. However, mobility assessment will be blinded, so the researchers involved in this task will not know the patient group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2024
First Posted
November 21, 2024
Study Start
May 16, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
January 31, 2026
Last Updated
March 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03