Comparison of Two Over the Counter Intravaginal Devices for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
IMPRIVE
IMPRIVE Pilot Study: Comparison of Two Over the Counter Intravaginal Devices for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot study is to compare two commercially available over the counter devices for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a web based format. The main questions it aims to answer
- 1.What device do women with SUI prefer after using both devices
- 2.What patient factors help drive this preference if any
- 3.Is a web-based crossover intervention study feasible
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2026
ExpectedMarch 16, 2026
March 1, 2026
10 months
November 18, 2024
March 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Device Preference
Women will be asked to rate each device on a 5 point Likert scale of 1-5. The options for responses will include very favorable, favorable, neutral, unfavorable, very unfavorable. The response for each device will then be compared.
Day 10, Day 20
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Patient's global improvement in urinary incontinence
Day 10 and Day 20
Comparison of reduction in number incontinence episodes
Daily for 20 days
Comparison of symptom bother ICIQ-SF
Day 1, Day 10, Day 20
Device Satisfaction
Day 10 and Day 20
Device Comfort
Day 10 and Day 20
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Continued patient product used after completion of study period
3 months after intervention completion
Study Arms (2)
Poise Impressa
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will be asked to use Poise Impressa for 7 days based on package insert
Revive
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will be asked to use Revive continence device based on package insert.
Interventions
The Poise® Impressa® is an over-the-counter intravaginal device for women over the age of 21 years with SUI. It is a disposable, one-time use tampon-like device that comprises a core, cover, and applicator. The device is inserted and removed like a vaginal tampon and comes in three sizes.
The Revive® is another over the counter vaginal insert for the treatment of SUI. This is a self-deployable, double-loop pessary device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with a history of stress urinary incontinence that have not undergone treatment that desire conservative management.
- years or older
- Report an average loss of urine greater than three episodes per week.
- Ability to receive mail through USPS
You may not qualify if:
- Patient should not be on vacation at time of study and should be performing daily activities.
- Inability to follow packaged instructions for insertion devices chosen to be included within this study
- Pregnancy or plan to become pregnant in the next three months
- Significant vaginal atrophy due to genitourinary syndrome of menopause
- Current use of over-the-counter vaginal insertion device for treatment of stress urinary incontinence
- Post-menopausal bleeding
- Participants that report visible prolapse and/or bother symptoms of prolapse
- Bladder modifying medications
- Unable to use incontinence device per package instructions
- Given birth in the past three months
- Had vaginal surgery in the last three months
- IUD placement in the past 6 months
- Vaginal infection or UTI that is active
- Undergoing pelvic floor physical therapy
- Had vaginal surgery within the last three months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211, United States
Related Publications (7)
McKay HG, King D, Eakin EG, Seeley JR, Glasgow RE. The diabetes network internet-based physical activity intervention: a randomized pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2001 Aug;24(8):1328-34. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.8.1328.
PMID: 11473065RESULTNekkanti S, Wu JM, Hundley AF, Hudson C, Pandya LK, Dieter AA. A randomized trial comparing continence pessary to continence device (Poise Impressa(R)) for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Apr;33(4):861-868. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04967-9. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
PMID: 34505171RESULTYalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.
PMID: 12861145RESULTDuenas-Garcia OF, Shapiro RE, Gaccione P. Safety and Efficacy of a Disposable Vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;27(6):360-364. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000861.
PMID: 32453209RESULTZiv E, Stanton SL, Abarbanel J. Significant improvement in the quality of life in women treated with a novel disposable intravaginal device for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jun;20(6):651-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0824-y. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
PMID: 19434384RESULTZiv E, Stanton SL, Abarbanel J. Efficacy and safety of a novel disposable intravaginal device for treating stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):594.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.061. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
PMID: 18377862RESULTLipp A, Shaw C, Glavind K. Mechanical devices for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 17;2014(12):CD001756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001756.pub6.
PMID: 25517397RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2024
First Posted
November 21, 2024
Study Start
June 30, 2025
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share