NCT06698627

Brief Summary

The goal of this pilot study is to compare two commercially available over the counter devices for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a web based format. The main questions it aims to answer

  1. 1.What device do women with SUI prefer after using both devices
  2. 2.What patient factors help drive this preference if any
  3. 3.Is a web-based crossover intervention study feasible

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
5mo left

Started Jun 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress68%
Jun 2025Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 18, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 21, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 30, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 16, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

November 18, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

stress urinary incontinence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Device Preference

    Women will be asked to rate each device on a 5 point Likert scale of 1-5. The options for responses will include very favorable, favorable, neutral, unfavorable, very unfavorable. The response for each device will then be compared.

    Day 10, Day 20

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Patient's global improvement in urinary incontinence

    Day 10 and Day 20

  • Comparison of reduction in number incontinence episodes

    Daily for 20 days

  • Comparison of symptom bother ICIQ-SF

    Day 1, Day 10, Day 20

  • Device Satisfaction

    Day 10 and Day 20

  • Device Comfort

    Day 10 and Day 20

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Continued patient product used after completion of study period

    3 months after intervention completion

Study Arms (2)

Poise Impressa

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will be asked to use Poise Impressa for 7 days based on package insert

Device: Daily Disposable Continence Device

Revive

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will be asked to use Revive continence device based on package insert.

Device: Monthly Disposable Continence Device

Interventions

The Poise® Impressa® is an over-the-counter intravaginal device for women over the age of 21 years with SUI. It is a disposable, one-time use tampon-like device that comprises a core, cover, and applicator. The device is inserted and removed like a vaginal tampon and comes in three sizes.

Poise Impressa

The Revive® is another over the counter vaginal insert for the treatment of SUI. This is a self-deployable, double-loop pessary device.

Revive

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women with a history of stress urinary incontinence that have not undergone treatment that desire conservative management.
  • years or older
  • Report an average loss of urine greater than three episodes per week.
  • Ability to receive mail through USPS

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient should not be on vacation at time of study and should be performing daily activities.
  • Inability to follow packaged instructions for insertion devices chosen to be included within this study
  • Pregnancy or plan to become pregnant in the next three months
  • Significant vaginal atrophy due to genitourinary syndrome of menopause
  • Current use of over-the-counter vaginal insertion device for treatment of stress urinary incontinence
  • Post-menopausal bleeding
  • Participants that report visible prolapse and/or bother symptoms of prolapse
  • Bladder modifying medications
  • Unable to use incontinence device per package instructions
  • Given birth in the past three months
  • Had vaginal surgery in the last three months
  • IUD placement in the past 6 months
  • Vaginal infection or UTI that is active
  • Undergoing pelvic floor physical therapy
  • Had vaginal surgery within the last three months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37211, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • McKay HG, King D, Eakin EG, Seeley JR, Glasgow RE. The diabetes network internet-based physical activity intervention: a randomized pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2001 Aug;24(8):1328-34. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.8.1328.

  • Nekkanti S, Wu JM, Hundley AF, Hudson C, Pandya LK, Dieter AA. A randomized trial comparing continence pessary to continence device (Poise Impressa(R)) for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Apr;33(4):861-868. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04967-9. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

  • Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.

  • Duenas-Garcia OF, Shapiro RE, Gaccione P. Safety and Efficacy of a Disposable Vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;27(6):360-364. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000861.

  • Ziv E, Stanton SL, Abarbanel J. Significant improvement in the quality of life in women treated with a novel disposable intravaginal device for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jun;20(6):651-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0824-y. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

  • Ziv E, Stanton SL, Abarbanel J. Efficacy and safety of a novel disposable intravaginal device for treating stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):594.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.061. Epub 2008 Apr 2.

  • Lipp A, Shaw C, Glavind K. Mechanical devices for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 17;2014(12):CD001756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001756.pub6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urinary IncontinenceUrination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Prior to randomization participants will be sent the Poise Impressa sizing kit via mail. They will then be asked what size of device works best for them based on the sizing kit. After this information is obtained they will then be sent both Revive and correct size of Poise Impressa. They will be randomized at this time regarding which device they will start with. If participants are menstruating, they will be asked to start this study after their last day of bleeding as this study will last approximately 20 days. They will then begin using the device they were randomized to use first for 7 days. There will be a three day wash out period and them they will use the remaining device for 7 days.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2024

First Posted

November 21, 2024

Study Start

June 30, 2025

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 16, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations