NCT06696547

Brief Summary

Our study was designed to investigate the effect of cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) combined with conventional rehabilitation methods on balance, gait and disease anxiety in patients with ischemic stroke who have residual balance and gait disturbance, using clinical measurement parameters.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 28, 2022

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2023

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 15, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 20, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 20, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

November 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationGaitBalance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    This is a scale used to evaluate patients' balance during 14 different activities. These activities include: sitting to standig, standing unsupported, sitting unsupported, standing to sitting, transfers, standing unsupported with eyes closed, standing with feet together, reaching forward while standing, picking up an object from the floor, looking back over the shoulder on both the right and left sides, turning 360 degrees, placing a foot on a stool, standing in a toe-heel position, and standing on one foot. The total score after performing the test determines the predicted risk of falls. The minimum score on the test is 0, and the maximum score is 56. Scores are classified as follows: 0-20 indicates a high risk of falling, 21-40 indicates a moderate risk of falling, and 41-56 indicates a low risk of falling.

    Baseline (before treatment), 3rd week (at the end of treatment), 6th week

  • Gait Analysis- Step Length

    The Zebris FDM Type 3 (Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) device was used to record spatiotemporal data during walking. This system consists of a 3-meter straight platform, with two 1-meter maneuvering platforms at the start and end. It is equipped with sensors and computer software for data analysis. The data collected in the study included step length (cm).

    Baseline (before treatment), 3rd week (at the end of treatment), 6th week

  • Gait Analysis- Step Width

    The Zebris FDM Type 3 (Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) device was used to record spatiotemporal data during walking. This system consists of a 3-meter straight platform, with two 1-meter maneuvering platforms at the start and end. It is equipped with sensors and computer software for data analysis. The data collected in the study included step width (cm).

    Baseline (before treatment), 3rd week (at the end of treatment), 6th week

  • Gait Analysis- Walking Speed

    The Zebris FDM Type 3 (Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) device was used to record spatiotemporal data during walking. This system consists of a 3-meter straight platform, with two 1-meter maneuvering platforms at the start and end. It is equipped with sensors and computer software for data analysis. The data collected in the study included walking speed (km/h).

    Baseline (before treatment), 3rd week (at the end of treatment), 6th week

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • International Falls Efficacy Scale (FES-I)

    Baseline (before treatment), 3rd week (at the end of treatment), 6th week

  • Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (BI)

    Baseline (before treatment), 3rd week (at the end of treatment), 6th week

  • Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)

    Baseline (before treatment), 3rd week (at the end of treatment), 6th week

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Baseline (before treatment), 3rd week (at the end of treatment), 6th week

Study Arms (2)

Active CRB-iTBS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients received a total of 30 sessions active CRB-iTBS targeting contralesional lateral cerebellum, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. The cerebellar region to be targeted, on the opposite side of the cerebral lesion, was determined by measuring 3 cm lateral and 1 cm inferior of the inion, which is the anatomical prominence on the occipital bone (3L1I). Stimulation intensity was set at 80% of the active motor threshold (AMT). AMT was defined as the lowest intensity required for a motor-evoked potentials (MEP) above 200 µV in at least 50% of 10 trials when the patient was contracting targeted muscle 10% on the maximum voluntary contraction. Stimulation was administered as 3-burst pulses at a frequency of 50 Hz, with 2-second stimulation repeated every 10 seconds period. This continued for a total duration of 190 seconds, delivering 600 pulses. Each CRB-iTBS session was performed in 2 sessions before daily rehabilitation programs. Thus, 1200 pulses were applied per day.

Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Sham CRB-iTBS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Patients received a total of 30 sessions sham CRB-iTBS targeting contralesional lateral cerebellum, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. The cerebellar region to be targeted, on the opposite side of the cerebral lesion, was determined by measuring 3 cm lateral and 1 cm inferior of the inion, which is the anatomical prominence on the occipital bone (3L1I). However, sham coil was used for stimulation. Therefore, no real stimulation was applied to the patients. Instead, a sensation mimicking real stimulation was created through the sham coil, with sounds and sensations on the scalp as if stimulation were occurring. Each sham CRB-iTBS session was performed in 2 sessions before daily rehabilitation programs.

Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham

Interventions

Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland Dyfed, UK), 70 mm Figure-of-eight Coil

Active CRB-iTBS

Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland Dyfed, UK), 70 mm Figure-of-eight Sham Coil

Sham CRB-iTBS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • First ischemic stroke,
  • Duration between 2 months to 2 years post-stroke,
  • Hemiparesis and residual gait and balance disorders related to the lesion in the MCA area (Berg Balance Scale score \< 40),
  • Lower extremity Brunnstrom value of at least 3 ,
  • Mini Mental State Examination ≥ 24,
  • Between 18-80 years old

You may not qualify if:

  • History of seizures,
  • Severe general impairmet or concomittant disease,
  • Using benzodiazepines, baclofen or antidepressants,
  • Having a cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant, metallic implants in the brain or skull,
  • Pregnancy,
  • Under 18 or over 80 years old

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Bilkent City Hospital

Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Field TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Filiz Acar Sivas, Prof, MD

    Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D., Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2024

First Posted

November 20, 2024

Study Start

February 28, 2022

Primary Completion

April 30, 2023

Study Completion

April 30, 2023

Last Updated

November 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations