Optimal Intravesical Lidocaine Volume for Pain Relief During Office Intra-detrusor Onabotulinum Toxin a Injections
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different volumes of bladder-numbing medication for pain relief at the time of office bladder Botox injections. This is a randomized prospective, double-blind superiority trial comparing 200 ml 2% lidocaine versus 30 ml 2% lidocaine for office Botox injections.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 19, 2024
November 1, 2024
6 months
November 11, 2024
November 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
a. Determine the efficacy of pain relief via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, scored 0-100 on 100 mm scale with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating the worst pain possible) in women randomized to 200 ml 2% lidocaine without epinephrine versus 30 ml 2% lidocaine without epinephrine prior to office intravesical onabotulinum toxin A (Botox) injections i. Perceived maximum VAS during the procedure and post-procedure ii. Superiority limit 20 mm on 100 mm VAS scale
on day of enrollment and procedure
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-Sat-q)
This will be assessed pre and post-intervention for all participants through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (PSQ-18)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Bladder diary
through study completion, an average of 1 year
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Higher volume intravesical lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR200 ml of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine intravesical instillation 20-30 minutes prior to bladder botox.
Lower volume intravesical lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 ml of 2% intravesical lidocaine without epinephrine instilled into the bladder 20-30 minutes prior to bladder botox.
Interventions
different volumes of intravesical 2% lidocaine without epinephrine, all patients will be receiving bladder botox but this will not be compared
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult female, \>18 years, English-speaking (surveys utilized are not validated in all languages)
- Able to provide informed consent
- Indications: Refractory urge urinary incontinence, Refractory urinary urgency and frequency, Neurogenic bladder (without sensory deficit)
You may not qualify if:
- Untreated urinary tract infection at the time of procedure
- Contra-indication to Botox
- Contraindication to intravesical lidocaine
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Pregnancy, breast-feeding, intending to become pregnant within 6 months of treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Louisville Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Related Publications (1)
Nambiar AK, Younis A, Khan ZA, Hildrup I, Emery SJ, Lucas MG. Alkalinized lidocaine versus lidocaine gel as local anesthesia prior to intra-vesical botulinum toxin (BoNTA) injections: A prospective, single center, randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of efficacy and morbidity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Apr;35(4):522-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.22750. Epub 2015 Mar 8.
PMID: 25754188BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sean Francis, MD
University of Louisville
Central Study Contacts
Laurel Carbone, MD
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- OBGYN Department Chair
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2024
First Posted
November 19, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plans to share data with other researchers/outside affiliates