NCT06693115

Brief Summary

Using a prospective, mixed methods study design, the investigators will assess the feasibility, usefulness, and care team acceptability of CGM in conjunction with FSBG during implementation of the new subQ DKA/HHS protocol at Regions Hospital. This will include evaluating how many patients agree to have a CGM device placed, time to place the CGM devices, CGM impact on length of stay, level of care required, frequency of alerts to changing glucose levels events, and assessing the match between CGM and FSBG readings done in the inpatient setting. Results will help inform cost effective, safe, patient-centered strategies, while gauging care team satisfaction to optimize DKA and HHS management in the future.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 18, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

November 6, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Determine feasibility of CGM placement by hospital staff for patients experiencing hyperglycemia

    Recruitment, overall participation, and completion rate.

    Duration of hospital stay from admission to discharge (average of 4 days).

  • Determine feasibility of CGM placement by hospital staff for patients experiencing hyperglycemia

    Time to place CGM (time from admission, time from insulin administration).

    From time of admission until the time of first insulin administration by CGM (average of 2 hours).

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Evaluate patient safety and care outcomes related to use of CGM during hospitalization

    Duration of hospital stay from admission to discharge (average of 4 days).

  • Evaluate patient safety and care outcomes related to use of CGM during hospitalization

    From admission to medical clearance for discharge or transfer to another healthcare facility, whichever comes first (average of 4 days).

  • Describe accuracy and usefulness of CGM for monitoring resolution from hyperglycemia

    Duration of hospital stay from admission to discharge (average of 4 days).

Study Arms (2)

CGM with alerts

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental group will have a Dexcom 7 CGM placed by a trained and credentialed member of the research team, or by a trained care team member (e.g. nurse, physician, diabetes educator). CGM devices will be set to alert the care team when interstitial glucose levels hit 250 mg/dL and 150 mg/dL. Dexcom 7s automatically alert when glucose levels are 55 mg/dL or lower. Nurses will be instructed to check the glucose trends on the CGM device when alerted. They will be asked to check glucose levels with a FSBG according to the following instructions: 1. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 250 mg/dL AND trend indicates rapidly decreasing glucose levels 2. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 150 mg/dL or less.

Device: CGM with alerts

CGM without alerts

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will have a Dexcom 7 CGM placed by a trained and credentialed member of the research team, or by a trained care team member (e.g. nurse, physician, diabetes educator). The control group will have the device placed and glucose levels will be collected, but the device will not be set to alert (though note that the Dexcom 7 CGM will always alert when glucose drops below 55 mg/dl, so this alert will exist for both groups).

Interventions

CGM devices will be set to alert the care team when interstitial glucose levels hit 250 mg/dL and 150 mg/dL. Dexcom 7s automatically alert when glucose levels are 55 mg/dL or lower. Nurses will be instructed to check the glucose trends on the CGM device when alerted. They will be asked to check glucose levels with a FSBG according to the following instructions: 1. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 250 mg/dL AND trend indicates rapidly decreasing glucose levels (indicated by double down arrow on Dexcom 7) 2. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 150 mg/dL or less.

CGM with alerts

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older
  • Presents at Regions Hospital ED including transfers from other hospitals
  • Meets criteria for new subQ insulin protocol:
  • Diagnosis of DKA or HHS (hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state) and provider decision to initiate insulin
  • pH ≥ 7.1
  • HCO3 ≥ 12

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Excluded from new subQ protocol, specifically:
  • Acute CHF exacerbation
  • Acute MI (ACS/NSTEMI type 1 not demand ischemia)
  • CKD stage 4 or AKI with creatinine \> 3
  • ESLD
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe sepsis or septic shock
  • AMS \> if patient cannot consent
  • Euglycemic DKA

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Regions Hospital

Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Wallia A, Umpierrez GE, Nasraway SA, Klonoff DC; PRIDE Investigators. Round Table Discussion on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring at the International Hospital Diabetes Meeting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1174-81. doi: 10.1177/1932296816656380. Print 2016 Sep.

    PMID: 27286715BACKGROUND
  • Park E, Kim M. Clinical Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Aug;25(8):529-537. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0012. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

    PMID: 37155338BACKGROUND
  • Klonoff DC, Ahn D, Drincic A. Continuous glucose monitoring: A review of the technology and clinical use. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;133:178-192. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

    PMID: 28965029BACKGROUND
  • Faulds ER, Jones L, McNett M, Smetana KS, May CC, Sumner L, Buschur E, Exline M, Ringel MD, Dungan K. Facilitators and Barriers to Nursing Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19. Endocr Pract. 2021 Apr;27(4):354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

    PMID: 33515756BACKGROUND
  • Zelada H, Perez-Guzman MC, Chernavvsky DR, Galindo RJ. Continuous glucose monitoring for inpatient diabetes management: an update on current evidence and practice. Endocr Connect. 2023 Sep 25;12(10):e230180. doi: 10.1530/EC-23-0180. Print 2023 Oct 1.

    PMID: 37578799BACKGROUND
  • Wright JJ, Williams AJ, Friedman SB, Weaver RG, Williams JM, Hodge E, Fowler M, Bao S. Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Inpatient Diabetes Management. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1252-1255. doi: 10.1177/19322968221076562. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

    PMID: 35128974BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic KetoacidosisHyperglycemia

Interventions

Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

KetosisAcidosisAcid-Base ImbalanceMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System DiseasesGlucose Metabolism Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood Chemical AnalysisClinical Chemistry TestsClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDiagnostic Techniques, EndocrineMonitoring, PhysiologicInvestigative Techniques
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2024

First Posted

November 18, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion

February 1, 2026

Study Completion

May 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 11, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD will not be shared to for HIPAA considerations and data is only to be used for measurement of site-specific protocols.

Locations