Efficacy of Stabilometric Platform to Improve Standing Balance in Patients With Friedreich's Ataxia
Studio Pilota Sull'Efficacia Della Pedana Stabilometrica Nel Trattamento Del Paziente Con Atassia di Friedreich
2 other identifiers
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to evaluate the potential effectiveness of an individualized intensive rehabilitation intervention using the "Prokin 252" stabilometric platform in the treatment of adolescent and adult patients with Friedreich's Ataxia. The secondary objective is to assess the retention of the rehabilitation treatment effects over time. Enrolled patients will be randomized and assigned to one of two treatment groups for four weeks. Three assessments will be conducted for each patient: one before treatment (T0), one at the end of treatment (T1), and a follow-up assessment 90 days after T1 via telemedicine (T2). This study is:
- Exploratory: The study aims to explore the usefulness of the stabilometric platform in a rehabilitative setting in combination with conventional therapy;
- Not "first-in-human";
- Longitudinal: The study will investigate changes over time in motor and functional ability scales, as well as stabilometric platform parameters, within the same cohort;
- Randomized, controlled, open-label;
- Monocentric: The study will be conducted only at the "La Nostra Famiglia" Association in Conegliano and Pieve di Soligo - IRCCS Eugenio Medea in Conegliano - UOC Neuromotor Rehabilitation in Pieve di Soligo, Via Monte Grappa, 96, 31053 Pieve di Soligo TV;
- Prospective;
- Post-market.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
May 2, 2025
April 1, 2025
2.8 years
November 14, 2024
April 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Score on the subscale 'Section E. Upright stability' of the modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale.
The outcome evaluates balance performance while sitting, standing, and walking. Lower scores indicate better balance performance, higher scores indicate more severe balance impairment.
Enrolment (T0), end of treatment at four weeks (T1), follow-up at 12 weeks after T1 (T2).
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS)
Enrolment (T0), end of treatment at four weeks (T1), follow-up at 12 weeks after T1 (T2).
Scale for Assessment and Rating for Ataxia (SARA).
Enrolment (T0), end of treatment at four weeks (T1), follow-up at 12 weeks after T1 (T2)..
Six minutes walking test (6MWT).
Enrolment (T0), end of treatment at four weeks (T1).
Timed Up and Go test (TUG).
Enrolment (T0), end of treatment at four weeks (T1).
Berg balance scale (BBS).
Enrolment (T0), end of treatment at four weeks (T1).
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Platform Group
EXPERIMENTALBalance training including both conventional rehabilitation (24 sessions) and training over a stabilometric platform (20 sessions).
Conventional Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORBalance training including only conventional rehabilitation (44 sessions).
Interventions
The treatment using the stabilometric platform (a total of 20 sessions) generally includes an initial phase (approximately 5 minutes) of training and warm-up in "monitor" mode, during which the patient becomes familiar with the equipment. The patient then moves on to "training library" mode, which includes the following subcategories: (1) Stabilometric tracings in both static and dynamic phases (10 minutes); (2) Dexterity exercises in both static and dynamic phases (10 minutes); (3) Imbalance exercises in both static and dynamic phases (10 minutes). The goal during this phase is to increase the patient's stability limits and provoke balance reactions through load shifts in all directions. The session concludes with 10 minutes of TecnoBody Exergames, which help to automate the functions learned within a more complex activity.
Conventional rehabilitation to improve balance includes an initial phase of tissue mobilization, particularly of the foot structures (approximately 5 minutes per foot), in order to prepare them for the subsequent activation phase. This is followed by a phase focused on activating the anti-gravity muscles and aligning the trunk within the chosen setting (10 minutes). The treatment continues with balance training, both static and dynamic, load transfers, and dual-task exercises using external references (15 minutes). The session concludes with functional exercises relevant to the patient's daily life context (10 minutes).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 14 years;
- Weight \< 150 kg;
- Genetic diagnosis of Friedreich's Ataxia;
- Subscores of SARA (Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia) as follows: (1) from 1 to 6 for the item 'Gait (walking ability)'; (2) from 1 to 3 for the item 'Stance (ability to maintain a stable posture)'; (3) ability to walk ≥10 metres with or without walking aids; (4) ability to stand unsupported; Stadiation of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale between 2 and 4.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 14 years;
- Diagnosis of acquired ataxia;
- Subscores for items on the SARA scale of: (1) 0 or 7 for gait; (2) 0 or 4-6 for stance;
- Inability to walk;
- Ability to walk \< 10 meters;
- Standing position possible only with support;
- Other associated neurological conditions;
- Current major psychiatric disorder (psychosis and major depression).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Department of Pieve di Soligo, Treviso, Italy
Pieve di Soligo, Veneto, 31053, Italy
Related Publications (12)
Zesiewicz TA, Stephenson JB, Kim SH, Sullivan KL, Jahan I, Huang Y, Salemi JL, Wecker L, Shaw JD, Gooch CL. Longitudinal gait and balance decline in Friedreich's Ataxia: A pilot study. Gait Posture. 2017 Jun;55:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
PMID: 28411441BACKGROUNDProsperini L, Pozzilli C. The clinical relevance of force platform measures in multiple sclerosis: a review. Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:756564. doi: 10.1155/2013/756564. Epub 2013 May 19.
PMID: 23766910BACKGROUNDPodsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
PMID: 1991946BACKGROUNDMilne SC, Kim SH, Murphy A, Larkindale J, Farmer J, Malapira R, Danoudis M, Shaw J, Ramakrishnan T, Rasouli F, Yiu EM, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Tai G, Zesiewicz T, Delatycki MB, Corben LA. The Responsiveness of Gait and Balance Outcomes to Disease Progression in Friedreich Ataxia. Cerebellum. 2022 Dec;21(6):963-975. doi: 10.1007/s12311-021-01348-2. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
PMID: 34855135BACKGROUNDMilne SC, Corben LA, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Delatycki MB, Yiu EM. Rehabilitation for Individuals With Genetic Degenerative Ataxia: A Systematic Review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Jul;31(7):609-622. doi: 10.1177/1545968317712469. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
PMID: 28595509BACKGROUNDJanuario F, Campos I, Amaral C. Rehabilitation of postural stability in ataxic/hemiplegic patients after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(21):1775-9. doi: 10.3109/09638281003734433.
PMID: 20350209BACKGROUNDIlg W, Milne S, Schmitz-Hubsch T, Alcock L, Beichert L, Bertini E, Mohamed Ibrahim N, Dawes H, Gomez CM, Hanagasi H, Kinnunen KM, Minnerop M, Nemeth AH, Newman J, Ng YS, Rentz C, Samanci B, Shah VV, Summa S, Vasco G, McNames J, Horak FB; Ataxia Global Initiative (AGI) working group Digital Motor Biomarkers. Quantitative Gait and Balance Outcomes for Ataxia Trials: Consensus Recommendations by the Ataxia Global Initiative Working Group on Digital-Motor Biomarkers. Cerebellum. 2024 Aug;23(4):1566-1592. doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01625-2. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
PMID: 37955812BACKGROUNDHartley H, Cassidy E, Bunn L, Kumar R, Pizer B, Lane S, Carter B. Exercise and Physical Therapy Interventions for Children with Ataxia: A Systematic Review. Cerebellum. 2019 Oct;18(5):951-968. doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01063-z.
PMID: 31392562BACKGROUNDCattaneo D, Jonsdottir J, Regola A, Carabalona R. Stabilometric assessment of context dependent balance recovery in persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jun 10;11:100. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-100.
PMID: 24912561BACKGROUNDBurciu RG, Fritsche N, Granert O, Schmitz L, Sponemann N, Konczak J, Theysohn N, Gerwig M, van Eimeren T, Timmann D. Brain changes associated with postural training in patients with cerebellar degeneration: a voxel-based morphometry study. J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 6;33(10):4594-604. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3381-12.2013.
PMID: 23467375BACKGROUNDBidichandani SI, Delatycki MB. Friedreich Ataxia. In: Adam MP, Pagon RA, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Stephens K, eds. GeneReviews™. Seattle: University of Washington; 2017.
BACKGROUNDBerg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995 Mar;27(1):27-36.
PMID: 7792547BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gabriella Paparella, Medical Degree
Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Department of Conegliano, Treviso, Italy.
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2024
First Posted
November 18, 2024
Study Start
February 3, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Start date: January 2028; End date: January 2038.
- Access Criteria
- Any researcher accredited by non-profit clinical and research centre.
Anonymized individual participant data will be shared with other researchers upon reasonable request.