Impact of HI-NPPV Vs LI-NPPV on Tolerance Among AECOPD Patients
Impact of High-Intensity-NIV Vs Low-intensity-NIV on Subjective Tolerance Amomg Patients with AECOPD : a Randomised Cross-over Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine whether high-intensity NPPV, compared with low-intensity NPPV, could have an effect on the subjective tolerance in patients with an AECOPD and hypercapnia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 18, 2024
October 1, 2024
10 months
October 22, 2024
November 14, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
NPPV subjective tolerance
NPPV subjective tolerance is mainly evaluated through two questionnaire surveys. Questionnaire survey 1 includes 19 questions, including bloating , appetite, thirst, dryness of the mouth and nose, conjunctivitis, facial tenderness, fear, airflow shock, mask tolerance, ear pain, noise, overall tolerance of NPPV, willingness to use NPPV, confidence of using NPPV, breathless relief score, sleep quality, drowsiness in day, physical strength, and mood. Questionnaire survey 2 mainly evaluates patients' feelings of using NPPV under different emotional states, feelings of using NPPV under different physical states, and feelings of using NPPV in daily life states. Each question is scored from 0 to 100 points. The higher scores indicate better positive feedback.
From randomization to 2 days after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Effects of NPPV on sleep quality
From randomization to 2 days after randomization
Study Arms (2)
High-intensity NPPV
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive high-intensity NPPV
Low-intensity NPPV
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive low-intensity NPPV
Interventions
In the high-intensity NPPV group, IPAP is initially adjusted in increments/decrements of 1-2 cmH2O, typically ranging from 20 to 30 cmH2O (or a tolerated maximum), to obtain a VT 10-15 mL/kg PBW and a respiratory rate \<25 breaths/min. Subsequent adjustments to IPAP are based on the results of arterial blood gases (ABGs; up to 30 cmH2O) to achieve normocapnia (if possible), or to maximally decrease PaCO2 toward normocapnia if normocapnia can not be achieved. If PaCO2 decreases to less than 35 mmHg, IPAP will be decreased to achieve normocapnia.
In the low-intensity NPPV group, as well as during the 6-hour trial of low-intensity NPPV, IPAP is initially adjusted in increments/decrements of 1-2 cmH2O (up to 20 cmH2O), according to patients' tolerance, to obtain a VT 6-10 mL/kg PBW and a respiratory rate \<25 breaths/min. Subsequent adjustments to IPAP are based on the results of ABGs (up to 20 cmH2O) to achieve a pH of ≥7.35 and to reduce PaCO2 to a level deemed appropriate by the attending physician.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- AECOPD confirmed by the 2019 criteria of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD);
- Arterial pH \<7.35 and PaCO2 \>45 mmHg at screening entry;
- PaCO2 \>45 mmHg after a 6-hour trial of low-intensity NPPV.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years
- Excessive respiratory secretions with weak cough
- Upper airway obstruction
- Recent oral, facial, or cranial trauma or surgery
- Recent gastric or esophageal surgery
- Presence of restrictive ventilatory dysfunction (eg, consolidation or removal of at least one pulmonary lobe, massive pleural effusion, chest wall deformity, continuous strapping with thoracic or abdominal bandage, or severe abdominal distension)
- Active upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- Cardiac or respiratory arrest
- Arterial oxygen tension/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) \<100 mmHg
- Pneumothorax
- Obvious emphysematous bullae confirmed by chest CT scan
- Ventricular arrhythmia or myocardial ischemia
- Severe hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg)
- Severe metabolic acidosis (pH \<7.20 and bicarbonate \<22 mmol/L)
- Refusal to receive NPPV or give informed consent
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100020, China
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2024
First Posted
November 18, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion
October 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share