NCT06688344

Brief Summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of fESWT in rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is fESWT applied in addition to conventional physiotherapy effective in physiotherapy-related parameters? Researchers will compare conventional physiotherapy and conventional physiotherapy + fESWT to see if fESWT provides benefits in addition to conventional physiotherapy. Participants: They will receive the conventional physiotherapy program 2 days per week. In addition, the intervention group will receive low-intensity fESWT 1 day per week. Participants' muscle strength, postural balance, range of motion, pain scores and functional status will be assessed.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
12mo left

Started Dec 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress59%
Dec 2024May 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 11, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 14, 2024

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 11, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Physiotherapy and rehabilitationESWTACL reconstruction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Knee extansor muscle strength

    The strength of the participants' knee flexor and knee extensor muscles will be measured with a hand held dynamometer. Knee extensor muscle strength will be performed in a sitting position. Participants will be seated on an examination table with their knees bent at 60° and their feet off the ground. The dynamometer will be placed on the front of the distal tibia, just above the malleoli for extensor strength and the posterior aspect of the distal tibia, just above the malleoli for flexor strength . Participants will grip the examination table with their hands for stabilization and will be asked to apply force to the dynamometer for 5 seconds with maximum force. 3 repetitions will be performed and the average will be calculated by dividing by body weight in N/kg.

    a time frame of 6,9,12 weeks

  • postural stability

    Participants' single-leg and double-leg postural stability assessments will be performed with the Biodex brand balance system. General balance index (OSI), anteroposterior balance index (APSI) and mediolateral balance index (MLSI) will be recorded. Measurements will be performed without shoes, with eyes open and arms crossed over the body. While the level of the system drops from 12 to 10 in the double-leg assessment, it will drop from 12 to 10 in the single-leg assessment. Participants will proceed to the test protocol consisting of 3 2o seconds each after a single trial measurement. The average score from the three test assessments will be calculated and recorded. 5-minute rest breaks will be given between the tests.

    a time frame of 6,9,12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • range of motion

    a time frame of 6,9,12 weeks

  • pain assessment - VAS

    a time frame of 6,9,12 weeks

  • pain assessment-algometer

    a time frame of 6,9,12 weeks

  • Functionality and daily living activity assessment-IKDC

    a time frame of 6,9,12 weeks

  • Functionality and daily living activity assessment-Lysholm Scale

    a time frame of 6,9,12 weeks

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

fESWT

Other: fESWTOther: Conventional Physiotherapy

Control group

SHAM COMPARATOR
Other: Conventional PhysiotherapyOther: shamfESWT

Interventions

fESWTOTHER

fESWT will be applied for 1 session between weeks 4-9. The device will be set to low intensity at 0.20 mJ/mm2 - 4 Hz, 500 pulses will be applied from the tibiofemoral interval to the center of the tibiofemoral joint, and 1000 pulses will be applied to the soft tissues around the patella.

Intervention group

Participants will be included in the traditional physiotherapy program for the first 9 weeks, and exercise progression will be provided in the form of weekly checks in the 10-12 week period. Between the 12-24th weeks, the exercise program will continue with face-to-face follow-up twice a month. The traditional physiotherapy program to be applied in the first 9-week period will be as follows : Week 1 Weight Transfer as Tolerable, NMES, Elevation, Cold Application, Ankle Pumping Exercises, Heel Slide Exercises, Isometric Quadriceps Exercises, Straight Leg Raise Exercises, Extension Brace Week 2-3 Weight Transfer, Gait Training, NMES, Heel Slide Exercises, Straight Leg Raise, Quadriceps and Adductor Isometric Exercises, Extension Brace, Bicycle, Hip Abduction-Adduction Exercises Week 4-8. week Mini Squat, Leg Press, Soft Ground Walking, Neuromuscular Training on Balance Board, Functional Strengthening with Elastic Band, Stair Climbing Up and Down

Also known as: Rehabilitation
Control groupIntervention group

Participants in the control group will receive sham fESWT once a week in weeks 4-9. Participants will be prepared in the same way as the fESWT procedure, but the application will be done with a sham device.

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 45 years
  • Unilateral ACL rupture
  • Isolated ACL injury
  • Hamstring graft

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous knee injury and anterior cruciate ligament revision
  • Synovitis, stiffness, tension
  • History of systemic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis
  • Presence of tumor
  • Deep vein thrombosis or vascular pathology in the lower extremity
  • RA or accompanying comorbidities
  • Having had intra-articular injection within 6 months
  • Cognitive impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Faculy of Medicine-Department of Sports Medicine

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (27)

  • Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği'nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği.

    RESULT
  • Hapidou EG, O'Brien MA, Pierrynowski MR, de Las Heras E, Patel M, Patla T. Fear and Avoidance of Movement in People with Chronic Pain: Psychometric Properties of the 11-Item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). Physiother Can. 2012 Summer;64(3):235-41. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-10.

  • Celik D, Coskunsu D, Kilicoglu O. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Turkish Lysholm knee scale: ease of use, validity, and reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2602-10. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3046-z. Epub 2013 May 11.

  • Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982 May-Jun;10(3):150-4. doi: 10.1177/036354658201000306.

  • Celik D, Coskunsu D, KiliCoglu O, Ergonul O, Irrgang JJ. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form into Turkish. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;44(11):899-909. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4865. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

  • Medial patellofemoral ligament rekonstrüksiyonu sonrası kalça abduktör kas kuvvetlendirme egzersizlerinin diz fonksiyonu üzerine etkisi.

    RESULT
  • Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):600-13. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290051301.

  • Akbari A, Ghiasi F, Mir M, Hosseinifar M. The Effects of Balance Training on Static and Dynamic Postural Stability Indices After Acute ACL Reconstruction. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jul 31;8(4):68-81. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n4p68.

  • Martin-Alguacil JL, Arroyo-Morales M, Martin-Gomez JL, Lozano-Lozano M, Galiano-Castillo N, Cantarero-Villanueva I. Comparison of knee sonography and pressure pain threshold after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts in soccer players. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Jul;53(4):260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

  • Luc-Harkey BA, Safran-Norton CE, Mandl LA, Katz JN, Losina E. Associations among knee muscle strength, structural damage, and pain and mobility in individuals with osteoarthritis and symptomatic meniscal tear. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 27;19(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2182-8.

  • Sık Yapılan Ortopedik Ameliyatlar ve Rehabilitasyon Yaklaşımları. İstanbul Tıp Kitabevleri

    RESULT
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.

  • Rahim M, Ooi FK, Shihabudin MT, Chen CK, Musa AT. The Effects of Three and Six Sessions of Low Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Graft Incorporation and Knee Functions Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Malays Orthop J. 2022 Mar;16(1):28-39. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2203.005.

  • Song Y, Che X, Wang Z, Li M, Zhang R, Wang D, Shi Q. A randomized trial of treatment for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 13;25(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07177-8.

  • Wang CJ, Ko JY, Chou WY, Hsu SL, Ko SF, Huang CC, Chang HW. Shockwave therapy improves anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2014 May 1;188(1):110-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.01.050. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

  • Weninger P, Thallinger C, Chytilek M, Hanel Y, Steffel C, Karimi R, Feichtinger X. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Improves Outcome after Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendons. J Clin Med. 2023 May 9;12(10):3350. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103350.

  • Wang CJ, Wang FS, Yang KD, Weng LH, Sun YC, Yang YJ. The effect of shock wave treatment at the tendon-bone interface-an histomorphological and biomechanical study in rabbits. J Orthop Res. 2005 Mar;23(2):274-80. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.07.004.

  • Shultz SJ, Sander TC, Kirk SE, Perrin DH. Sex differences in knee joint laxity change across the female menstrual cycle. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005 Dec;45(4):594-603.

  • Dugan SA. Sports-related knee injuries in female athletes: what gives? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Feb;84(2):122-30. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000154183.40640.93.

  • Demange MK, de Almeida AM, Rodeo SA. Updates in biological therapies for knee injuries: tendons. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014 Sep;7(3):239-46. doi: 10.1007/s12178-014-9230-2.

  • Treatment of medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee with focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy: A case report.

    RESULT
  • Moya D, Ramon S, Schaden W, Wang CJ, Guiloff L, Cheng JH. The Role of Extracorporeal Shockwave Treatment in Musculoskeletal Disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Feb 7;100(3):251-263. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00661. No abstract available.

  • Role of physiotherapy and physical agent modalities for musculoskeletal disorders: Present and future. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6461

    RESULT
  • Gesslbauer C, Mickel M, Schuhfried O, Huber D, Keilani M, Crevenna R. Effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome : A randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021 Jun;133(11-12):568-577. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01785-9. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

  • Ke MJ, Chen LC, Chou YC, Li TY, Chu HY, Tsai CK, Wu YT. The dose-dependent efficiency of radial shock wave therapy for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 2;6:38344. doi: 10.1038/srep38344.

  • Wang CJ. An overview of shock wave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. Chang Gung Med J. 2003 Apr;26(4):220-32.

  • Wuerfel T, Schmitz C, Jokinen LLJ. The Effects of the Exposure of Musculoskeletal Tissue to Extracorporeal Shock Waves. Biomedicines. 2022 May 6;10(5):1084. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10051084.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Rehabilitation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Central Study Contacts

Berivan Beril Kılıç, Asst. Prof.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2024

First Posted

November 14, 2024

Study Start

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations