Continue ESPB & Continue ESPB Combined With SAPB for Thoracotomy
Continue Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Continue Erector Spinae Block Combined With Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients who have undergone thoracotomy experience severe pain in the postoperative period. This pain leads to many complications. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) are alternative methods to thoracic epidural block (TEB) that provide analgesia in thoracic pain. The application of both blocks and the nerves they affect are different. The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of the combination of ESPB and SAP against ESPB in patients who have undergone thoracotomy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 18, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 19, 2025
December 1, 2025
4 months
November 11, 2024
December 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain scores
Pain scores (Numerical rating scale) (0-meaning "no pain" to 10-meaning "worst pain imaginable") during postoperative 72 hours period. Active NRS (when moving, coughing,) Passive NRS (Inactivity) Active and passive NRS scores of both groups of participants will be questioned at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72. hours. NRS scores between both groups will be compared
at the first 72 hours period postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Opioid consumption
Postoperative between 0-4, 4-8, 8-24, 24-48 and 48-72. hours intervals
Requirement for rescue analgesics
Postoperative 72 hours
Study Arms (2)
Group EPSB (Continue Erector Spinae Plane Block)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFollowing induction of anesthesia, ESPB will be performed with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine®) and a catheter will be placed before the start of surgery. 15 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine solution will be administered through the ESPB catheter at 12-hour intervals following the end of surgery. All participants will be attached to a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device prepared with 5 mg/ml tramadol (Contramal®) as soon as they are admitted to the recovery room. PCA will be non-infusion, with a lockout period of 20 minutes and a bolus dose of 10 mg. In the postoperative period, 1 g paracetamol (Parol®) will be administered intravenously every 8 hours, 75 mg diclofenac (Dikloron®) intramuscularly if NRS≥4 and 0.5 mg/kg meperidine (Aldolan®) intravenously if NRS≥4 is still present after 2 hours.
Group ESPB+SAPB (Continue Erector Spinae Plane Block + Serratus Anterior Plane Block)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFollowing induction of anesthesia, ESPB with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine®) will be performed and the catheter will be placed before the surgery starts. After the end of surgery, SAPB with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be performed before extubation. Following the end of the surgery, 15 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine solution will be administered through the ESPB catheter at 12-hour intervals. All participants will be attached to a patient-controlled analgesia device prepared with 5 mg/ml tramadol (Contramal®) as soon as they are admitted to the recovery room. There will be no infusion in PCA, 20 minutes lock time, 10 mg bolus dose. In the postoperative period, 1 g paracetamol (Parol®) will be administered intravenously every 8 hours, 75 mg intramuscular diclofenac (Dikloron®) if NRS≥ 4 and 0.5 mg/kg meperidine (Aldolan®) intravenously if NRS≥ 4 is still present after 2 hours.
Interventions
For the block, the ultrasound (USG)probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the transverse process of the T4-5 vertebra. The erector spinae muscle will be visualized above the hyperechoic transverse process. Using in plane technique, the block needle will be advanced in the cranio-caudal direction and 5 ml of saline will be injected under the erector spinae muscle to confirm the block site. After the block site is confirmed, 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcain 0.5%® AstraZeneca, England) will be administered. The block catheter (Perifix® Braun, Germany) will then be inserted to block area
For ESPB, USG probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the transverse process of the T4-5 vertebra. The erector spinae muscle will be visualized above the hyperechoic transverse process. Using in plane technique, the block needle will be advanced in the cranio-caudal direction and 5 ml of saline will be injected under the erector spinae muscle to confirm the block site and 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcain®) will be administered. The block catheter (Perifix®) will be inserted. For SAPB, the USG probe will be placed parasagittal to the mid-axillary line at the 5th-6th rib level and the anechoic shadow of the costa together with the latissumus dorsi and serratus anterior muscles will be visualized. Then using in plane technique, the block needle will be advanced in the cranio-caudal direction and 5 ml of saline will be injected under the serratus anterior muscle and the block site will be confirmed and 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with ASA classification I-III
- Aged 18-80 years
- Who will be scheduled for thoracotomy
You may not qualify if:
- Those with psychiatric-neurological diseases that may affect pain perception
- Regular users of antipsychotics, antidepressants
- Allergic to any of the drugs specified in the protocol
- Presence of contraindications to regional anesthesia (infection at the site of the block, bleeding diathesis, etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bursa City Hospital
Bursa, 16000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (6)
Deng B, Qian K, Zhou JH, Tan QY, Wang RW. Optimization of Chest Tube Management to Expedite Rehabilitation of Lung Cancer Patients After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):2039-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3975-x.
PMID: 28289835BACKGROUNDNagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Aug;72(2):362-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02804-1.
PMID: 11515867BACKGROUNDBlanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1107-13. doi: 10.1111/anae.12344. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
PMID: 23923989BACKGROUNDForero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUNDSavage C, McQuitty C, Wang D, Zwischenberger JB. Postthoracotomy pain management. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2002 May;12(2):251-63. doi: 10.1016/s1052-3359(02)00011-x.
PMID: 12122825BACKGROUNDToscano A, Capuano P, Costamagna A, Canavosio FG, Ferrero D, Alessandrini EM, Giunta M, Rinaldi M, Brazzi L. Is continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) better than continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) for mitral valve surgery via mini-thoracotomy? Results from a prospective observational study. Ann Card Anaesth. 2022 Jul-Sep;25(3):286-292. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_69_21.
PMID: 35799555BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient and the outcomes assessor who performs postoperative pain evaluation will not know the group
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2024
First Posted
November 12, 2024
Study Start
October 18, 2024
Primary Completion
February 10, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12