Nonattachment Training for Post Traumatic Stress Recovery
NPTS
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a novel, co-created intervention based on principles of nonattachment for individuals recovering from Post-Traumatic Stress (PTS). Objectives include:
- 1.Determine whether participants undertaking nonattachment-based training have higher levels of nonattachment (as indicated by NAS Scale) after completing program.
- 2.Determine whether nonattachment levels are impacted after 3 months
- 3.Determine whether PTS symptoms are impacted by training/intervention
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 12, 2024
November 1, 2024
2 months
November 7, 2024
November 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Nonattachment Scale
This study seeks to understand the impact of the program on levels of nonattachment. Details of the Nonattachment scale (NAS)can be found here: DOI: 10.1080/00223890903425960 NAS is a 30-item Likert scale informed by Buddhist principles measuring aspects such as psychological flexibility, nonreactivity, and capacity for recovery after emotional disturbance. Minimum value is 30 (all answers =1). Maximum value is 180 (all answers = 6). Higher score values are associated with better outcomes.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks, and again 3 months later.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Self-reported experiences of Post Traumatic Stress Symptoms using a combination of established trauma-based assessments, and qualitative analysis.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks, and again 3 months later.
Study Arms (2)
Treatment Group 1
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive the first round of access to the program.
Treatment as Usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will be given access to the program 10 weeks after group 1 so that data from each condition can be compared.
Interventions
This study seeks to cultivate nonattachment specifically for the alleviation of symptoms of post-traumatic stress. This is an 8-week online intervention where, following a Qualrics-hosted pre-screen, users are directed to www.npts.online to use as they wish. Users are then solicited to re-take quantitative assessments, and a subset of 10 (target number) will be recruited for a qualitative interview regarding their experience of the intervention. A final prompt for assessment re-takes will follow at 3 months post-intervention to determine longitudinal efficacy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Current or recent (within 12 months) diagnosis of PTSD (self-disclosed) OR
- Participants meeting diagnostic requirements of the ITQ OR
- Participants meeting diagnostic requirements of the PCL-C
- Participants willing and able to engage in self-directed course content (self-disclosed)
- Participants willing and able to engage with contemplative principles and practices (self-disclosed)
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English-speaking participants OR participants with a primary residence outside the UK
- Under the age of 18
- Participants with comorbidities such as drug or alcohol misuse which could prevent successful intervention engagement
- Participants diagnosed with a psychotic disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Derby
Derby, UK, DE22 1GB, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Weathers, F.W., Litz, B.T., Keane, T.M., Palmieri, P.A., Marx, B.P., & Schnurr, P.P. (2013). The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Scale available from the National Center for PTSD at www.ptsd.va.gov.
BACKGROUNDBaer RA, Smith GT, Lykins E, Button D, Krietemeyer J, Sauer S, Walsh E, Duggan D, Williams JM. Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment. 2008 Sep;15(3):329-42. doi: 10.1177/1073191107313003. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
PMID: 18310597BACKGROUNDBond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25.
PMID: 22035996BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
William Van Gordon, PhD
University of Derby
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2024
First Posted
November 12, 2024
Study Start
November 18, 2024
Primary Completion
January 31, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The Research Ethics Committee of the College of Health, Psychology and Social Care at the University of Derby in accordance with the British Psychological Society (BPS) guidelines for research (2021) has reviewed and approved this study on the condition of participant anonymity. The nature of the qualitative data collected may be particularly sensitive, and there is no need to identify participants for data analysis.