Virtual Agent Feasibility in Oncology Patients (NTT Data)
A Randomized Pilot Study Comparing the Feasibility of Using a Virtual Agent vs. an Off-site Human Agent to Onboard Oncology Patients to a Remote Monitoring Device
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the use of a virtual agent vs. a human agent when onboarding oncology patients over the telephone to Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) devices. RPM devices are instruments that a patient can use to measure their own weight and vital signs. Both the virtual and human agents will be available by telephone to instruct the patient on how to use the RPM devices to measure weight, blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation. Patients will be randomized to either the virtual or human agent, have assessments of their medical and oncological history, overall well-being, body measurements, and vital signs, and will complete questionnaires about their experience.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
March 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
4 months
November 7, 2024
March 17, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Usability of virtual agent vs. human agent for onboarding patients to RPM devices as assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS)
The SUS is a questionnaire that assesses perceived usability. It includes 10 five-point items with alternating positive and negative tone. The final score is a number 0-100 with a higher score indicating better usability.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Description of the patient experience when using a virtual agent in the context of teaching a patient as assessed by the patient experience survey.
Day 3
Identification of opportunities to improve the use of a virtual agent in the context of teaching a patient as assessed by the patient experience survey.
Day 3
Study Arms (2)
Virtual agent
EXPERIMENTALHuman agent
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The virtual agent is an interactive audio agent that is similar to voice agents that interact with callers in many industries today. They create a very human-like interaction in contrast to more traditional virtual call agents that can only respond to menu options (e.g. "choose "1" for appointments, choose "2" for questions about your bill", etc.). The virtual agent is engineered to accomplish the very specific task of onboarding the patient on use of the RPM devices. It is trained to understand normal human English speech, detects emotional tone and frustration of callers, and is trained to deescalate when appropriate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization for the release of personal health information.
- Age ≥18
- Cancer (solid tumor)
- Planning to return to Duke Cancer Center clinic for three days in a row
- Patients whose treatment does not require that they return to clinic for three days in a row, but who are willing to voluntarily return to participate in this study are permitted to enroll.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2
- Native fluency of spoken English as determined by the investigator
- Non-native English speakers are permitted to enroll if they have achieved native fluency.
- Vitals as collected by the clinic using Duke maintained equipment must be within the ranges specified by the remote patient monitoring devices.
- Weight ≤ 180 kg
- Systolic blood pressure ≤ 300 mmHg
- Pulse rate of 40-200 bpm
- SpO2 of 70-100%
- Temperature 34.0-42.2°C
- Arm circumference of 22-42 cm
You may not qualify if:
- \. Vision, speech, auditory, physical, cognitive or other impairment that has the potential to interfere with the use of the remote patient monitoring device or agent, in the opinion of the investigator or study coordinator.
- Has an implanted pacemaker, arterio-venus (A-V) shunt, a history of mastectomy or lymph node clearance, history of severe blood flow problems or blood disorders, or a history of severe circulatory deficit in the arm.
- Is pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura Alder, MD
Duke University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2024
First Posted
November 12, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share