Online Intervention to Promote Change and Help-Seeking in Young Adults With Gambling and Trading Problems
Online Personalized Normative Feedback to Foster Intention to Change and Help-Seeking in Young Adults With Gambling- and Trading-Related Problems: An Experimental Study
1 other identifier
interventional
1,112
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to investigate if personalized online normative feedback (PONF) can increase intention to change and help-seeking behaviors in young adults with gambling or trading problems in Spain. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Evaluation group: A control group with pre- and post-assessments.
- Delayed evaluation group: A control group with only a post-assessment, to control for the effect of the assessment.
- FNPO group: An intervention group receiving PONF after the initial evaluation and completing both pre- and post-assessments. Participants will:
- Receive PONF or no feedback at the first evaluation.
- Complete initial and follow-up assessments after 12 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedJanuary 30, 2026
January 1, 2026
6 months
November 7, 2024
January 28, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Intention to change
The study will assess intention to change and help-seeking behavior using three custom items. In the initial assessment, participants will respond to a dichotomous question regarding whether they have considered reducing or abandoning gambling/trading in the past year. They will also rate the likelihood of engaging in these behaviors over the next 12 months on a scale from 0% (not likely) to 100% (very likely). Finally, participants will indicate their goal regarding their gambling/trading behavior, choosing from options to reduce, increase, maintain, or cease the behavior.
Baseline, immediate follow-up (after PONF), 3-month follow-up
Treatment-seeking behavior
Treatment-seeking behavior will be assessed during the initial evaluation using a the following question: "Have you ever sought professional help, advice from family or friends, or done something on your own to limit or reduce your \[gambling/trading\] behavior?" If participants answer "yes," they will complete the Help-Seeking Questionnaire (HSQ), which includes 14 items assessing in-person (e.g., seeing a psychologist), remote (e.g., calling a helpline), and self-directed (e.g., reading forums or searching websites) help-seeking behaviors.
Baseline, immediate follow-up (after PONF), 3-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Gambling and trading behaviors
Baseline, immediate follow-up (after PONF), 3-month follow-up
Disordered gambling
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Disordered trading
Baseline, 3-month follow-up
Other Outcomes (4)
Gambling and trading-related harms
Baseline and 3-month follow-up
Gambling and trading self-efficacy
Baseline and 3-month follow-up
Peer gambling and trading
Baseline
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Personalized Online Normative Feedback (PONF)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group complete a pre-assessment measuring intention to change, help-seeking behavior, and gambling and trading behaviors (e.g., frequency and spending). They then receive personalized online normative feedback (PONF) based on their initial assessment and subsequently complete a post-assessment including the same outcomes. Within this intervention arm, participants are randomly assigned to one of two predefined assessment sequences (PNF-A vs. PNF-B), differing only in the timing of the post-intervention assessment of gambling and trading behaviors. This sequencing is implemented exclusively to support secondary analyses of potential reporting reactivity (e.g., social desirability) and does not involve any differences in intervention content, delivery, or assessment of the primary motivational outcomes.
Control group 1 (Assessment group)
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this group will complete both pre- and post-assessments on intention to change, help-seeking behavior, and gambling/trading behaviors. However, they will not receive any feedback. This group serves as a comparison to both intervention groups.
Control group 2 (Delayed Assessment Group)
NO INTERVENTIONThis group will complete only the post-assessment, measuring intention to change, help-seeking behavior, and gambling/trading behaviors, without completing a pre-test or receiving feedback, to independently analyze the immediate effects of the pre-test.
Interventions
Those participating in this condition will receive a personalised brief report which summarises the results of their initial assessment. The PONF will comprise the following elements: (1) Details of the main gambling and trading activities performed, including frequency of engagement and amount of money spent; (2) Scores on the criteria of pathological trading and/or PGSI (problem gambling), together with an interpretation of the results and the level of severity. All results will be accompanied by graphs enabling participants to compare their scores with the average scores of the Spanish population of the same sex and age range. To prevent an increase in behaviour in participants whose frequency or intensity of gambling/trading is below the norm, as recommended by Newall et al. (2023), the normative data will include extreme averages and percentages. All participants assigned to the PNF intervention receive identical feedback content, regardless of assessment sequencing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Engaged in trading or gambling activities (land-based or online) at least once per month in the past 60 days
- Aged 18-34 years
- Residing in Spain
- Provide informed consent to participate in initial online assessment, post-test, and follow-up
- Currently undergoing psychological or psychiatric treatment
- Scoring above 3 on the Oviedo Infrequency Scale (Fonseca-Pedrero et al., 2009), indicating potential random/pseudorandom or dishonest responses.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Miguel Hernández University
Elche, Alicante, 03202, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2024
First Posted
November 8, 2024
Study Start
December 20, 2024
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
January 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share