NCT06679244

Brief Summary

This is a prospective study using a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label, and efficacy validated approach.At present, there is no universally recognized optimal method for gastrointestinal reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.Author's team has proposed an innovative method named Hao's Esophagogastrostomay by Fisture Technique (HEFT).By adding anti reflux structures such as "false gastric fundus" and "false cardia" to the anastomosis of the residual stomach of the esophagus, not only can the purpose of anti reflux be achieved, but also the normal physiological channel can be maintained, it can fully utilize residual stomach function and reduce the difficulty of surgery.Through retrospective research, our single center has confirmed that HEFT is safe and feasible.On this basis, this study will compare the nutritional status, short- and medium- to long-term safety after laparoscopic HEFT and double-tract reconstruction , in order to evaluate and discover more reasonable digestive tract reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy, and to promote the development and popularization of minimally treatment technology for gastric cancer. This study was jointly conducted by Shanghai-level hospitals (Huashan Hospital ,Shanghai Cancer Center, and Ruijin Hospital), with Huashan Hospital as the leading unit. This study will recruit 52 patients, with 26 patients in the experimental group and 26 patients in the control group. Using a central dynamic randomization method based on minimization, patients are assigned to groups in a 1:1 ratio. Based on the different anastomotic methods used in proximal gastrectomy, patients are divided into a HEFT group (experimental group) and a double-tract reconstruction group (control group).Plan to collect cases for 2 years, and follow up for another year after the last case is enrolled. The primary endpoint of the study was the body weight loss (BWL) rate at 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints: Effect evaluation indicators: hemoglobin level at 1 year after surgery; Serum albumin level at 1 year after surgery; The incidence of anastomotic stenosis 1 year after surgery; Incidence of reflux esophagitis at 1 year after surgery. Evaluation of short-term surgical safety (duration: 7 days): operation time, intraoperative bleeding, anastomotic leakage, pancreatic leakage, and incidence of abdominal infection; Evaluation of medium- and long-term safety after surgery (duration: 36 months): overall survival rate at 3 years after surgery; disease-free survival rate at 3 years after surgery.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
38mo left

Started Dec 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress32%
Dec 2024Jun 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 5, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 7, 2024

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 4, 2024

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2029

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2029

Last Updated

July 22, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.5 years

First QC Date

November 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

proximal gastrectomytotally laparoscopic gastrectomyfissure technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • body weight loss(BWL)

    Measure the weight before surgery and 1 year after surgery, BWL=(preoperative weight -1 year after surgery weight)/preoperative weight (unit:%)

    From enrollment to 1 year after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Hemoglobin 1 year after surgery

    1 year after surgery

  • Serum albumin 1 year after surgery

    1 year after surgery

  • Incidence of anastomotic stenosis 1 year after surgery

    1 year after surgery

  • Incidence of reflux esophagitis 1 year after surgery

    1 year after surgery

  • Duration of surgery

    intraoperative

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Performing Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique

Performing double-tract reconstruction

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction

Interventions

This is an innovative surgical method applied in proximal gastrectomy. By adding anti reflux structures such as "false gastric fundus" and "false cardia" on the basis of esophageal residual gastric anastomosis, the goal of anti reflux is achieved, while maintaining normal physiological channels and fully utilizing residual gastric function, reducing the difficulty of proximal gastrectomy surgery

Performing Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique

This is a traditional surgical method that has been widely used in proximal gastrectomy. After disconnecting the proximal stomach, performing Roux-en-Y anastomosis of the esophagus and jejunum firstly, followed by lateral anastomosis of the residual stomach and jejunum. Previous studies have confirmed its safety and effectiveness, but there are also issues of gastric channel disuse and high missed detection rate of residual stomach.

Performing double-tract reconstruction

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old ≤ 80 years old;
  • The primary tumor lesion is located in the upper part of the stomach or the esophagogastric junction (Siewert II or III), and it is expected that R0 surgical results can be obtained by performing proximal gastrectomy and D2 dissection;
  • The primary lesion was diagnosed as adenocarcinoma through endoscopic biopsy and histopathological examination;
  • If it is upper gastric adenocarcinoma, the clinical TNM staging based on imaging needs to be cT1N0M0. If it is ductal gastric junction adenocarcinoma, it needs to be cT1-3N0-1M0, and clinical imaging judgment shows no distant gastric lymph node metastasis;
  • Expected survival exceeds 6 months;
  • No history of upper abdominal surgery (excluding laparoscopic cholecystectomy);
  • No chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc. were performed before surgery;
  • Preoperative ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) physical status score 0/1;
  • Preoperative ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grading I-III ;
  • Good function of important organs;
  • Sign the patient's informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Preoperative imaging examination suggests the fusion of enlarged lymph nodes (maximum diameter ≥ 3cm) in the area;
  • Pregnant and lactating women;
  • Suffering from other malignant tumors within 5 years;
  • Preoperative body temperature ≥ 38 ℃ or complicated with infectious diseases requiring systematic treatment;
  • Serious mental illness;
  • Severe respiratory diseases, FEV1\<50% of the expected value;
  • Severe liver and kidney dysfunction;
  • History of unstable angina or heart attack within 6 months;
  • History of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within 6 months, excluding old intracavitary infarction;
  • Apply systemic corticosteroid therapy within one month;
  • Patients with complications of gastric cancer (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) requiring emergency surgery;
  • The patient has participated or is currently participating in other clinical studies (within 6 months)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, 200025, China

RECRUITING

Huashan Hospital, Fudan University

Shanghai, China

RECRUITING

Second Department of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center,

Shanghai, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (13)

  • Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Moriya H, Hirai K, Watanabe M. Clinical experience of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with Toupet-like partial fundoplication in early gastric cancer for preventing reflux esophagitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Sep;209(3):344-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 Jun 18.

    PMID: 19717038BACKGROUND
  • Aizawa M, Yabusaki H, Nakada K, Matsuki A, Bamba T, Nakagawa S. A Retrospective Review of a Single-Center Experience with Posterolateral Fundoplication During Esophagogastrostomy After Proximal Gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Dec;25(12):3230-3233. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05052-8. Epub 2021 Jul 8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 34240326BACKGROUND
  • Shoji Y, Nunobe S, Ida S, Kumagai K, Ohashi M, Sano T, Hiki N. Surgical outcomes and risk assessment for anastomotic complications after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for upper-third gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019 Sep;22(5):1036-1043. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-00940-0. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

    PMID: 30838469BACKGROUND
  • Kuroda S, Choda Y, Otsuka S, Ueyama S, Tanaka N, Muraoka A, Hato S, Kimura T, Tanakaya K, Kikuchi S, Tanabe S, Noma K, Nishizaki M, Kagawa S, Shirakawa Y, Kamikawa Y, Fujiwara T. Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-flap technique as antireflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy (rD-FLAP Study). Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018 Oct 11;3(1):96-103. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12216. eCollection 2019 Jan.

    PMID: 30697614BACKGROUND
  • Aihara R, Mochiki E, Ohno T, Yanai M, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, Ando H, Asao T, Kuwano H. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2343-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0947-8. Epub 2010 Apr 8.

    PMID: 20376493BACKGROUND
  • Tanaka K, Ebihara Y, Kurashima Y, Nakanishi Y, Asano T, Noji T, Murakami S, Nakamura T, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, Shichinohe T, Hirano S. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with oblique jejunogastrostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Sep;402(6):995-1002. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1587-4. Epub 2017 May 10.

    PMID: 28493146BACKGROUND
  • Aikou T, Natsugoe S, Shimazu H, Nishi M. Antrum preserving double tract method for reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy. Jpn J Surg. 1988 Jan;18(1):114-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02470857.

    PMID: 3386066BACKGROUND
  • Zang L. [Reconstruction following laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;15(8):787-9. Chinese.

    PMID: 23072016BACKGROUND
  • Fujiya K, Kawamura T, Omae K, Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Terashima M. Impact of Malnutrition After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer on Long-Term Survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(4):974-983. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6342-8. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

    PMID: 29388124BACKGROUND
  • Yamasaki M, Takiguchi S, Omori T, Hirao M, Imamura H, Fujitani K, Tamura S, Akamaru Y, Kishi K, Fujita J, Hirao T, Demura K, Matsuyama J, Takeno A, Ebisui C, Takachi K, Takayama O, Fukunaga H, Okada K, Adachi S, Fukuda S, Matsuura N, Saito T, Takahashi T, Kurokawa Y, Yano M, Eguchi H, Doki Y. Multicenter prospective trial of total gastrectomy versus proximal gastrectomy for upper third cT1 gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;24(2):535-543. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01129-6. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

    PMID: 33118118BACKGROUND
  • Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jan;26(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

    PMID: 36342574BACKGROUND
  • GBD 2017 Stomach Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;5(1):42-54. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30328-0. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

    PMID: 31648970BACKGROUND
  • Cui WL, Wang ZQ, Shi XL, Ma MY, Wang J, Wang ZH, Wang YP, Hong J, Hao HK. Application of Hao's Esophagogastrostomy by Fissure Technique (HEFT) in proximal gastrectomy: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e104365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104365.

Central Study Contacts

Hankun Hao, doctor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Based on the different anastomotic methods used in proximal gastrectomy, patients are divided into a HEFT group (experimental group) and a double-tract reconstruction group (control group). HEFT group:Patients included in this group will receive totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique(HEFT),which is an innovative surgery that investigators first began to apply in patients with proximal gastric cancer. double-tract reconstruction group:Patients included in this group will receive totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction group,which is a widely used and proven safe and effective surgical approach in proximal gastrectomy
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2024

First Posted

November 7, 2024

Study Start

December 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Last Updated

July 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations