Effect of Adding Magnesium Sulphate As Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block in Upper Abdominal Cancer Surgery.to Assess the Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption in the First 24 H and Evaluate Post Operative VAS Score
1 other identifier
interventional
68
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
double blind randomized controlled trial will be conducted on upper abdominal cancer surgery cases to study the effect of Adding Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block in Upper Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Dec 2024
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2027
November 7, 2024
November 1, 2024
2 years
November 5, 2024
November 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
dose postoperative opioid consumption
the total dose postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 h.
baseline
Study Arms (2)
group bupivacaine
EXPERIMENTALgroup magnesium sulphate &bupivacaine
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
External Oblique Intercostal plane block technique with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% only bilateral
External Oblique Intercostal plane block technique with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%+200 mg magnesium sulphate bilateral
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a. Age \>18 years old b. Both sex c. Patients who were in risk-scoring groups I-III of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
You may not qualify if:
- c. Patients' refusal, d. History of allergy to any of the study medications e. Any contraindications to regional anesthesia. f. Patients with anatomical abnormalities. g. Patients have hemodynamic instability. h. Patients with local infection, and suspected intra-abdominal sepsis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
El Sherif F, Gomaa Sayed D, Fares KM, Mohamed SA, Osman AM, Kamal Sayed A, Mamdouh Kamal S. Magnesium Sulfate in Pediatric Abdominal Cancer Surgery: Safety and Efficacy in Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (US-TAP) Block in Conjugation with Levobupivacaine. Local Reg Anesth. 2023 Sep 12;16:133-141. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S425649. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37719936BACKGROUNDCosarcan SK, Ercelen O. The analgesic contribution of external oblique intercostal block: Case reports of 3 different surgeries and 3 spectacular effects. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30435. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030435.
PMID: 36086688BACKGROUNDMehmet Selim C, Halide S, Erkan Cem C, Onur K, Sedat H, Senem U. Efficacy of Unilateral External Oblique Intercostal Fascial Plane Block Versus Subcostal TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized, Prospective Study. Surg Innov. 2024 Aug;31(4):381-388. doi: 10.1177/15533506241256529. Epub 2024 May 23.
PMID: 38780355BACKGROUNDElsharkawy H, Kolli S, Soliman LM, Seif J, Drake RL, Mariano ER, El-Boghdadly K. The External Oblique Intercostal Block: Anatomic Evaluation and Case Series. Pain Med. 2021 Nov 26;22(11):2436-2442. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab296.
PMID: 34626112BACKGROUNDKorkusuz M, Basaran B, Et T, Bilge A, Yarimoglu R, Yildirim H. Bilateral external oblique intercostal plane block (EOIPB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Saudi Med J. 2023 Oct;44(10):1037-1046. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.10.20230350.
PMID: 37777270BACKGROUNDLin T, Yu J, Hu Y, Liu H, Lu Y, Zhao M, Chen H, Chen X, Li G. [Preliminary experience of dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 25;22(1):35-42. Chinese.
PMID: 30703792BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- An independent anesthesiologist randomly using computer-generated random numbers divided the patients into 2 groups :(Group 1 and Group 2). Each group will include 34 patients. We discreetly placed the randomization results in envelopes until the end of the study. The researchers who were responsible for postoperative follow-up and data processing were blinded to the group allocation during the whole study period. All patients were also blinded to the group allocation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- resident doctor at Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2024
First Posted
November 7, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Last Updated
November 7, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL