Comparison Between Botox and Magnesium Sulfate Effect in Treatment of Myofascial Pain Trigger Points Within the Masseter Muscle
MPS MTrPs BTA
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin and Magnesium Sulfate Injections in the Treatment of Myofascial Trigger Points in the Masseter Muscle Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of Botulinum toxin type A, magnesium sulfate and saline injections in treatment of the masseter muscle trigger points, in patients between 16 - 50 years old with myofascial pain with masseter muscle trigger points. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- which treatment has longer effect of pain release with the least possible side effects and recurrence rate?
- Which treatment has greater impact on improving patient's quality of life? Researchers will compare Botulinum toxin type A, magnesium sulfate to a placebo saline injections in treatment of the masseter muscle trigger points Participants will attend to the clinic 4 times
- 1st visit will include taking preoperative records and treatment injection
- 2nd visit will be follow up and taking records after 1 month
- 3rd visit will be follow up and taking records after 3 months
- 4th visit will be follow up and taking records after 6 months
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 12, 2024
November 1, 2024
2 months
November 4, 2024
November 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluating pain
Pain will be recorded with a visual analog scale (VAS of 0-10, with zero being no pain and 10 the worst pain possible)
preoperative - post operative - 1 , 3 ,6 months follow up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain-free maximum mouth opening (MMO)
preoperative - post operative - 1 , 3 ,6 months follow up
Muscle health and activity measured using electromyography
preoperative - post operative - 1 , 3 ,6 months follow up
The quality of life will be assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14)
preoperative - post operative - 1 , 3 ,6 months follow up
Study Arms (3)
Group I: Patients will receive Magnesium Sulfate injection into trigger points
EXPERIMENTALGroup II: Patients will receive Botulinum Toxin into trigger points
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup III: Patients will receive Saline injection into trigger points
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
2ml MgSo4 (Magnesium sulfate sterile ampoule 10 ml, 100 mg/ml = 0.41 mMol/ml. Egyptian Int. Pharmaceutical Industries Co., Egypt).
2 ml of saline
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with orofacial pain and trigger points in the masseter muscle unilaterally or bilaterally for at least period 6 months other criteria
- Definite diagnosis of myofascial pain based on the DC/TMD criteria with a referral
- Presence of one or more unilateral or bilateral trigger points in the masseter muscle
- No history of any invasive procedures of the related masseter muscle (Taşkesen, Cezairli, 2023.)
You may not qualify if:
- Any painful conditions (other than myofascial trigger points) affecting the orofacial region
- Any systemic diseases that could affect masticatory function (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis and epilepsy
- Pregnancy and lactation. (Refahee, Mahrous, Shabaan,2022)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Misr university for science and technology
Giza, Egypt
Related Publications (16)
Zielinski G, Bys A, Szkutnik J, Majcher P, Ginszt M. Electromyographic Patterns of Masticatory Muscles in Relation to Active Myofascial Trigger Points of the Upper Trapezius and Temporomandibular Disorders. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;11(4):580. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040580.
PMID: 33805008BACKGROUNDYilmaz O, Sivrikaya EC, Taskesen F, Pirpir C, Ciftci S. Comparison of the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin, Local Anesthesia, and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Patients With Myofascial Trigger Points in the Masseter Muscle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;79(1):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
PMID: 33045182BACKGROUNDTaskesen F, Cezairli B. The effectiveness of the masseteric nerve block compared with trigger point injections and dry needling in myofascial pain. Cranio. 2023 Mar;41(2):96-101. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1820686. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
PMID: 32935643BACKGROUNDTantanatip, A. and Chang, K.V., 2018. Myofascial pain syndrome.
BACKGROUNDSluka KA, Kalra A, Moore SA. Unilateral intramuscular injections of acidic saline produce a bilateral, long-lasting hyperalgesia. Muscle Nerve. 2001 Jan;24(1):37-46. doi: 10.1002/1097-4598(200101)24:13.0.co;2-8.
PMID: 11150964BACKGROUNDSlade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994 Mar;11(1):3-11.
PMID: 8193981BACKGROUNDSimons DG. Review of enigmatic MTrPs as a common cause of enigmatic musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004 Feb;14(1):95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.018.
PMID: 14759755BACKGROUNDSaxena A, Chansoria M, Tomar G, Kumar A. Myofascial pain syndrome: an overview. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Mar;29(1):16-21. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2014.997853. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
PMID: 25558924BACKGROUNDRefahee SM, Mahrous AI, Shabaan AA. Clinical efficacy of magnesium sulfate injection in the treatment of masseter muscle trigger points: a randomized clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02452-3.
PMID: 36123724BACKGROUNDPihut M, Ferendiuk E, Szewczyk M, Kasprzyk K, Wieckiewicz M. The efficiency of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of masseter muscle pain in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction and tension-type headache. J Headache Pain. 2016;17:29. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0621-1. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
PMID: 27011213BACKGROUNDNitecka-Buchta A, Walczynska-Dragon K, Batko-Kapustecka J, Wieckiewicz M. Comparison between Collagen and Lidocaine Intramuscular Injections in Terms of Their Efficiency in Decreasing Myofascial Pain within Masseter Muscles: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial. Pain Res Manag. 2018 Jun 3;2018:8261090. doi: 10.1155/2018/8261090. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29973970BACKGROUNDIbrahim NA, Abdel Raoof NA, Mosaad DM, Abu El Kasem ST. Effect of magnesium sulfate iontophoresis on myofascial trigger points in the upper fibres of the trapezius. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021 Jan 19;16(3):369-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.12.015. eCollection 2021 Jun.
PMID: 34140864BACKGROUNDFiorillo L. Spine and TMJ: A Pathophysiology Report. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020 Mar 30;5(2):24. doi: 10.3390/jfmk5020024.
PMID: 33467240BACKGROUNDDahle LO, Berg G, Hammar M, Hurtig M, Larsson L. The effect of oral magnesium substitution on pregnancy-induced leg cramps. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):175-80. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90186-8.
PMID: 7631676BACKGROUNDBlanco-Rueda JA, Lopez-Valverde A, Marquez-Vera A, Mendez-Sanchez R, Lopez-Garcia E, Lopez-Valverde N. Preliminary Findings of the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in Temporomandibular Disorders: Uncontrolled Pilot Study. Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;13(2):345. doi: 10.3390/life13020345.
PMID: 36836702BACKGROUNDAikawa Y, Lynch KL, Boswell KL, Martin TF. A second SNARE role for exocytic SNAP25 in endosome fusion. Mol Biol Cell. 2006 May;17(5):2113-24. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-01-0074. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
PMID: 16481393BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- B.D.S. Faculty of Oral and Dental Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2024
First Posted
November 6, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
August 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11