BASIS Optimization

NCT06672835 | Recruiting

• 2 other identifiers: STUDY000213935P50MH126219-04
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 32
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The objective of the BASIS R34 pilot study is to test the impact of eBASIS in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Consistent with IMPACT's IQM, the study tests effects of eBASIS on treatment fidelity and youth outcomes, compared to a digitally delivered control (N=32 clinicians; 96 clients). A well-established EBP (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Plus), will be a focus of the investigation, which eligible participants will already be signed up to receive.

Conditions

Mental Health; Health Services; Evidence Based Programs in Schools

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

• Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS)

  Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale is a 15-item measure that captures a providers attitudes toward evidence-based practices. It consist subscales 1) appeal of EBP, 2) openness to new EBP, 3) likelihood of adopting an evidence-based practice, and 4) perceived divergence between current and evidence-based practices. The scores for the subscales range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very great extent). The higher score equates to better attitude toward EBP.

  Baseline, immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

• Subjective Norms

  Subjective Norms Scale is based on Theory of Planned Bheavior (TBP) which consist of two implementation-related subject norms sub scales: descriptive norms and injuctive norms. Each subscale include four items with score ranging from -3 to 3, with positive scores reflective more descriptive and injunctive norms.

  Baseline, immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

• Outcome Expectancies

  Outcome expectanies is a one-item measure that assess provider's view of the outcome of implementing evidence-based practice to be positive or negative. The score ranges from 0, strongly disagree to 4, strongly agree. The higher the score, the positive the provider's outcome expectancy.

  Baseline, immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

• Action Self-Efficacy

  Action Self-Efficacy Scale is a modified version of the Teacher's Self-Efficacy Scale used to assess provider's confidence and self-efficacy in using the given evidence-based practice. This is 4-item measure with score ranging from 1, very false to 7, very true. The higher the score the more confidence the provider has in their ability to start using the evidence-based practice.

  Baseline, immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

• Maintenance Self-Efficacy

  Maintenance Self-Efficacy measure is used to asses provider's confidence and self-efficacy in continuing to use the given evidence-based practice. It is a one item measure with score ranging from 1, very false to 7, very true. The higher the score the more confidence the provider has in their ability to continue using the evidence-based practice.

  immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

• Perceived Needs

  Perceived Needs is a 1-item measure that assess if they have to improvie their skills in supporting students' mental health. The scores are 0- no, 1-I don't know, and 3-Yes.

  Baseline, immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

• Modified Intention to Implement Scale (MIIS)

  Modified Intentions to Implement Scale is used to understand a provider's intention to implement the given evidence-based practice. The survey includes 5-items, and the score ranges from -3, strongly disagree to 3, strongly agree.

  Baseline, immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

• Intervention Usability Scale (IUS)

  Intervention Usability Scale (IUS) is a an 10-tem scale that assess the usability of evidence-based practice. The score ranges from 0, strongly disagree to 4, strongly agree. The higher score indicates that the provider finds the evidence-based practice is easier to use.

  immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

• Action Plan

  Action Plan is a one item measure to assess if the provider has an action plan in place to implement evidence-based practice. The score ranges from from 0, none are in place to 3, all are in place. The higher score, the more the provider has planned out evidence practice implementation.

  immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

• Coping Plan

  Coping Plan is a one item measure to assess if the provider has come up with solutions to overcome any problems they face while implementing evidence-based practice. The score ranges from from 0, none are in place to 3, all are in place. The higher score, the more the provider has planned out evidence practice impementation.

  immediately after training, 2 weeks after training, 1 month after training, 2 months after training, 3 months after training

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• School Implementation Leadership Scale (S-ILS)

  2 weeks after training

• School Implementation Climate Scale (S-ICS)

  2 weeks after training

Study Arms (2)

eBASIS

EXPERIMENTAL

eBASIS is an online, optimized, and evidence-based practice agnostic implementation strategy that addresses the behavioral component often missing from standard evidence-based practice training and consultation. It relates to motivation before and volition after the evidence-based practice training and targets behavioral intentions by improving attitudes, subjective norms, and self-efficacy. The implementation strategy is designed to be designed to be delivered within the Preparation/Adoption phase immediately prior to the Action implementation in the EPIS model.

Behavioral: eBASIS

eAttention Control

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

eAC is an online control for eBASIS. Providers assigned to eAttention Control (eAC) will receive pre- and post-training experiences designed to mirror those received in eBASIS. These training experiences will be delivered on the same platform and be approximately the same length as the eBASIS but will not contain any eBASIS content or mechanisms of change. The eAC pre-training experience will define, describe, and advocate for evidence-based practice implementation in schools. Content in eAC will be didactic similar to a typical professional development training for providers.

Behavioral: eAttention Control

Interventions

eBASIS BEHAVIORAL

eBASIS is an online, optimized, and evidence-based practice agnostic implementation strategy that addresses the behavioral component often missing from standard evidence-based practice training and consultation. It relates to motivation before and volition after the evidence-based practice training and targets behavioral intentions by improving attitudes, subjective norms, and self-efficacy. The implementation strategy is designed to be designed to be delivered within the Preparation/Adoption phase immediately prior to the Action implementation in the EPIS model.

eBASIS

eAttention Control BEHAVIORAL

eAC is an online control for eBASIS. Providers assigned to eAttention Control (eAC) will receive pre- and post-training experiences designed to mirror those received in eBASIS. These training experiences will be delivered on the same platform and be approximately the same length as the eBASIS but will not contain any eBASIS content or mechanisms of change. The eAC pre-training experience will define, describe, and advocate for evidence-based practice implementation in schools. Content in eAC will be didactic similar to a typical professional development training for providers.

eAttention Control

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Mental health provider who spends 2 hours or more providing supports in school setting
• Registered to receive CBT+ training from the WA State EBP Initiative

You may not qualify if:

• None

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Washington: lead
• University of Kansas: collaborator
• National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH): collaborator

Study Sites (1)

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, 98115, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personal Satisfaction; Behavior

Study Officials

• Aaron Lyon, PhD

  University of Washington

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Aaron Lyon, PhD

CONTACT

206-221-8604; lyona@uw.edu

Maria Hugh, PhD

CONTACT

785-864-1143; mariahugh@ku.edu

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Purpose: HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Professor

Model Details: The intervention study model is parallel where participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=16) and the active comparator group (n=16).

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: October 30, 2024
• First Posted: November 4, 2024
• Study Start: October 5, 2024
• Primary Completion (Estimated): July 30, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): July 30, 2026
• Last Updated: April 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

US (1)