Suturing Techniques for Vesico-urethral Anastomosis
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Suturing Techniques for Vesico-urethral Anastomosis on One-year Voiding Function After Radical Prostatectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most common curative treatment for prostate cancer (PCa).Vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) is a crucial step and either a conventional interrupted (IS) or a running (RS) suture is employed during radical prostatectomy (RP). Certainly, both RS and IS have advantages and limitations. The metanalysis revealed that potential advantages for RS compared to IS, especially for short-term outcomes such as catheterization time, extravasation rate, and anastomotic suture time. There were no significant differences for long-term outcomes (continence, incidence of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis). Generally, the exciting evidence suggests that CS should be preferred over IS. However, this should be followed only if it is technically feasible and appropriate regarding the surgical approach. Both techniques seem to be safe and appropriate for the VUA, and the technique should be chosen based on individual experience and preference. The investigators hypothesized that RS and IS may have different effects on voiding function and flow rate, even if they do not cause an anastomotic stenosis requiring intervention. Furthermore, there is no existing literature that compares RS and IS in terms of voiding function.This article focuses on one year uroflowmetric voiding parameters, urinary function (UF), and UF related bother function, urinary continence recovery as well as other secondary outcomes, including surgical parameters, perioperative morbidity and oncological outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2024
CompletedNovember 4, 2024
October 1, 2024
1.5 years
October 31, 2024
October 31, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Maximum flow rate (MFR)
Uroflowmetry is a noninvasive test that measures the rate of urine flow over time. Uroflowmetry involves a well-hydrated patient voiding into a uroflowmeter, which in turn generates a "flow curve." The flow curve enables the measurement of the MFR .A value of 15ml/sec or below is deemed to be outside the normal range.
preoperative and 1,3,6,12 months visits after surgery.
Post-voiding residuel volume (PVR)
PVR is defined as the residual urine volume in the bladder following voiding, as calculated by ultrasound imaging. A volume of 150 cc or above is regarded as pathological.
preoperative and 1,3,6,12 months visits after surgery.
Urinary function(UF)
Urinary function(UF) and urinary function-related bother: UF measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score \[IPSS\]) The IPSS is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 . UF-related bother measured by the IPSS quality of life question with a response from 0 to 6.
preoperative and 1,3,6,12 months visits after surgery.
Continence recovery
Urinary continence recovery defined as patient-reported use of zero pad or one security pad per day.
preoperative and 1,3,6,12 months visits after surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Surgical parameters
During the operation
Anastomotic extravasation
Postoperative day 5.
Perioperative complications
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Running suture (RS)
ACTIVE COMPARATORRunning suture technique for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy
Interrupted suture (IS)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterrupted suture technique for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy
Interventions
The surgical technique of the RS followed the description of Van Velthovens, was applied with slight modifications. Two 3/0 absorbable monofilament (polydioxanone) sutures were used. The first needle is started from bladder neck at 3 o'clock, and terminated in the urethra at 9 o'clock. After completion of the posterior anastomosis, a transurethral catheter is placed. The second sutures' needle is passed from the bladder at 9 o'clock and ended in the urethra at 3 o'clock. The bladder neck and urethra are merged by gentle traction of the anterior and posterior sutures at 3 and 9 o'clock.
The technique described by Walsh for interrupted anastomotic suturing was applied with minor modifications. Six 3/0 absorbable monofilament (polydioxanone) sutures were placed at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 o'clock to accomplish the vesicourethral anastomosis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of clinically localised (pT1-pT2) prostate cancer
- must select the open radical prostatectomy procedure as a treatment option.
You may not qualify if:
- History of acute urinary retention
- History of urethral stricture
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34865, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Utku Can
Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Data were collected by an independent database administrator and stored in a password-protected Microsoft Excel file. The data files were not accessible to the surgical team or to residents or ancillary staff involved in postoperative care.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor of urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2024
First Posted
November 1, 2024
Study Start
February 7, 2022
Primary Completion
August 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 16, 2024
Last Updated
November 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share