Effect of Osteopathy Medicine on Post-surgical Management of Lumbosacral Arthrodesis
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction : Low back pain represents a major public health issue. In some cases, surgery may be necessary, but it is not without consequences. Among these, we find pain that may require management in specialized centers as well as functional disability, particularly in cases of arthrodesis, thereby affecting the quality of life of patients. Objectives : To study the effectiveness of osteopathy in the post-surgical management of lumbo-sacral arthrodesis. Methods : A pilot study including 35 patients who underwent lumbo-sacral arthrodesis divided into 2 groups: standardized osteopathic treatment and sham. The protocol consists of 2 post-operative sessions (D2 3 and D90). The evaluated criteria were pain intensity using the VAS, functional disability with the Oswestry questionnaire, anxiety and depression with the HAD questionnaire, and analgesic consumption. Result : Compared to the sham group, the osteopathic treatment group exhibited a lack of significance in the VAS (p= NS), Oswestry (p= NS) and HAD (p= NS) scores. Analgesic consumption also demonstrated a lack of statistical significance (p= NS). Discussion : In this study, osteopathy did not show an impact on HAD, Oswestry, VAS scores, or analgesic consumption. Based on other articles, there seems to be a link between the effectiveness of osteopathy and the frequency of sessions. Thus, it might be interesting to repeat the study with a larger sample size, the use of other measurement tools, and an increase in session frequency to validate these results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Mar 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2024
CompletedNovember 1, 2024
October 1, 2024
12 months
October 31, 2024
October 31, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Analogic Visual Scale of pain
Pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal pain).
at day 0 pre surgery, day 2 post surgery, day 90 post surgery (pre and post intervention) and day 105 post surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
OSWESTRY
day 0 pre surgery - day 90 post surgery - day 105 post surgery
Hospital Anxiety and Depression
day 0 pre surgery, day 90 post surgery
Antalgic consumption
from day 0 to day 105
Study Arms (2)
Manual therapy standardized protocol group
EXPERIMENTALThis arm received 2 session of manual therapy (standardized protocol) 2-4 days after surgery and 90 days after surgery
Sham protocol group
SHAM COMPARATORThe sham group received a standardized protocol of ligth touch with wide pressure of the 2 hands, without intention to treat.
Interventions
In first session 6 techniques were applied to favorise fluids circulation, respiratory mecanism end equilibration of pressions (all were external soft tissue techniques, without manipulation): on cervico dorsal hinge, on cranial diaphragm, on thoracic diaphragm, on pelvic diaphram, on liver and spleen organ, on lumbar fasciae. In second session 6 techniques were applied in order to improve quality and quantity of legs and pelvis mobility (all were external sof tissue techniques, without manipulation) : on cervico dorsal hinge, on cranial diaphragm, on thoracic diaphragm, on pelvic diaphram, on pubic symphysis, on legs and pelvis and on lumbar fasciae
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- having surgery in Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale
- surgery of lumbosacral arthrodesis
You may not qualify if:
- spine deformation
- inflammatory rhumatim
- neurodegenerative pathology
- cognitive trouble
- neoplasic pathology
- surgery complication
- second surgery
- out of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale Lyon Charcot
Ste Foy Les Lyons, 69110, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Laurianne Tournier-Pinloche, PhD, MsC, Osteopathe DO
Centre Européen d'Enseignement Supérieur de l'Ostéopathie de Lyon
- STUDY CHAIR
Pierre Grobost, PhD
Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale Lyon Charcot
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aline Rollet, Ostéopathe DO, MsC Cand.
Centre Européen d'Enseignement Supérieur de l'Ostéopathie de Lyon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2024
First Posted
November 1, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2023
Primary Completion
February 15, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
November 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after publication of results
- Access Criteria
- on demand near to the principal investigator
all IPD that underlie results in a publication