Non-Invasive Programmed Stimulation (NIPS) to Guide the Subsequent VT Therapeutic Strategies
The Value of Late Non-Invasive Programmed Stimulation (NIPS) in the Setting of Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) Ablation to Guide the Subsequent VT Therapeutic Strategies: a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to define the importance of non-invasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) in risk stratification of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence after catheter ablation and to determine the optimal treatment strategy. The primary objective is to establish whether a new VT ablation based on NIPS inducibility will reduce the risk of VT recurrence compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 12, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
March 27, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.5 years
October 21, 2024
March 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
VT recurrence free survival rate
Compare the efficacy on the reduction of VT recurrence of a NIPS-based Re-Do VT ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy
12 months after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of ICD shocks
Procedural, periprocedural, 6 and 12 months after procedure
Proportion of patients with VT storm
Procedural, periprocedural, 6 and 12 months after procedure
Rate of subsequent hospitalization for VT recurrence/HF.
Procedural, periprocedural, 6 and 12 months after procedure
Cardiac mortality
Procedural, periprocedural, 6 and 12 months after procedure
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTALAAD therapy
Group 2
EXPERIMENTALRe-Do ablation procedure
Interventions
1\. Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS); 2. Mapping during Sinus Rhythm (SR) or right ventricular pacing in pacing dependent patients; 3. Late Potentials identification; 4. VT(s) induction with diastolic pathway mapping when possible; 5. Catheter Ablation in SR or, at the operator's discretion, in VT if tolerated by the patient; 6. If VT is not inducible or the diastolic pathway is not mappable, a substrate ablation approach will be performed. 7. PVS is repeatedly attempting to reinduce VT after completing; 8. Endpoint: non-inducibility of any VT.
The patients with a positive NIPS already on antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) before the index procedure will re-start the original antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients who were not on AAD will start a new drug at the operator's discretion (amiodarone, sotalol, or mexiletine) according to clinical practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with an implanted ICD (all brands)
- Patients who underwent a successful (non-inducibility of any VT) Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation procedure, the "index procedure", supported by EnSite Precision or CARTO 3D mapping systems for the following etiologies: previous MI, myocarditis, ARVD, IDCM.
- Induction of monomorphic VT at NIPS 3-7days after a successful index procedure
- Age 18 years or more
- Able to provide an informed consent to participate to the study and available to respect the assessments described in the protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Inducible VT after index procedure
- Contraindication to anticoagulants
- Presence of thrombi
- Presence of Mitral and Aortic prosthetic valve
- Recent (\<3 months) myocardial infarction or unstable angina or Coronary Artery Bypass
- Pregnant or nursing
- Ventricular Tachycardia caused by reversible pathology
- \< 1 Year life expectancy according to the investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
San Raffaele Hospital, Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology unit
Milan, Italy, 20132, Italy
Related Publications (4)
Della Bella P, Peretto G, Paglino G, Bisceglia C, Radinovic A, Sala S, Baratto F, Limite LR, Cireddu M, Marzi A, D'Angelo G, Vergara P, Gulletta S, Mazzone P, Frontera A. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation for ventricular tachycardias originating from the interventricular septum: Safety and efficacy in a pilot cohort study. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2111-2118. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
PMID: 32599177RESULTIrie T, Yu R, Bradfield JS, Vaseghi M, Buch EF, Ajijola O, Macias C, Fujimura O, Mandapati R, Boyle NG, Shivkumar K, Tung R. Relationship between sinus rhythm late activation zones and critical sites for scar-related ventricular tachycardia: systematic analysis of isochronal late activation mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;8(2):390-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002637. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
PMID: 25740836RESULTMuser D, Hayashi T, Castro SA, Supple GE, Schaller RD, Santangeli P, Arkles J, Kumareswaran R, Nazarian S, Deo R, Lin D, Dixit S, Epstein AE, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE, Frankel DS. Noninvasive Programmed Ventricular Stimulation-Guided Management Following Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jun;5(6):719-727. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 May 1.
PMID: 31221360RESULTOloriz T, Baratto F, Trevisi N, Barbaro M, Bisceglia C, D'Angelo G, Yamase M, Paglino G, Radinovic A, Della Bella P. Defining the Outcome of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Timing and Value of Programmed Ventricular Stimulation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Mar;11(3):e005602. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005602.
PMID: 29545359RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2024
First Posted
November 1, 2024
Study Start
June 12, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share