Insufficient Regional Anesthesia and Conversion to General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section A Qualitative Multicenter Study
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
7
Brief Summary
Background In Denmark, approximately 20% of all children are born via cesarean section (C-section), making it the most common surgical procedure (also internationally). The recommended anesthesia for cesarean sections is regional anesthesia (spinal or epidural, "spinal anesthesia"), as it has several advantages: the woman is awake and experiences the delivery of her child, she maintains spontaneous breathing (the risk of difficult airway management is significantly higher in pregnant women), and the risk of aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs (which is clearly increased in pregnant women) is reduced. Furthermore, regional anesthesia can contribute to early postoperative pain management to some extent. With spinal anesthesia, most women feel pressure and touch but no pain during the cesarean section. However, some women do experience pain during the procedure, necessitating a change in the plan. If inadequate anesthesia is detected before the surgery begins, one may choose (depending on, for example, the urgency of the cesarean) to administer renewed regional anesthesia (typically an epidural). However, if the woman first experiences pain after the surgery has commenced, it is necessary to place her under general anesthesia for the remainder of the procedure. Experience shows that this process can be challenging, and there are frequent examples in clinical practice of inappropriate courses of action, where women have experienced unacceptable pain during their cesarean sections without being placed under general anesthesia. It is difficult to obtain an exact figure on how many women experience inadequate anesthesia during cesarean sections under regional anesthesia, as not all cases are recognized or followed up on. Studies indicate that up to 12% experience pain during a cesarean section. The consequences of inadequate anesthesia for cesarean sections can be quite significant for women, including impaired bonding with the child, poorer establishment of breastfeeding, increased risk of postpartum reactions and post-traumatic stress, as well as (anecdotally) the risk of women opting out of future pregnancies, as they may be reluctant to subject themselves to a similar situation again. Aim The aim of this study is to investigate how women experience insufficient regional anesthesia during cesarean sections that require conversion to general anesthesia. The focus is on exploring the factors that contribute positively and negatively to the woman's experience in this situation. Method Qualitative study in six Danish hospitals. Inclusion criteria:
- Women undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section, aged over 17 years
- Regional (spinal or epidural or combined epidural-spinal) anesthesia converted to general anesthesia intraoperatively (i.e., after surgery has commenced) due to insufficient regional anesthesia (i.e., not for obstetric indications, such as in cases of difficult fetal extraction) Exclusion criteria:
- Does not speak Danish or English
- Does not wish to participate The woman will be contacted for the first time on day 1 or 2 after the cesarean section (before she is discharged from the hospital). She will be informed about the project and invited to participate. As a potential project participant, she is entitled to a 24-hour consideration period, and if desired, a new contact will be arranged for the following day. If she wishes to participate, she will be contacted again after 3 months. At this time, she will receive a call to schedule a follow-up telephone interview within a few days. This will take place as a semi-structured interview, initiated with open questions and concluded with a few more specific questions. At the end of the interview, a screening for post-traumatic stress will be conducted using the PTSD-8 tool. Follow-up interviews will be recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. Sample Size The project encompasses all women at the participating centers who experience insufficient regional anesthesia during a cesarean section and conversion to general anesthesia during 1 year.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2025
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2027
ExpectedAugust 27, 2025
August 1, 2025
1 year
October 31, 2024
August 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Parturients experience of insufficient regional anesthesia and conversion to general anesthesia
Parturients experience of insufficient regional anesthesia during cesarean sections that require conversion to general anesthesia. Investigated through semi-structured telephone interviews. The focus is on exploring the factors that contribute positively and negatively to the woman's experience of this situation.
Three months after the cesarean section
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Posttraumatic stress
Three months after the cesarean section
Study Arms (1)
Partuients experiencing conversion of regional to general anesthesia for cesarean section
All parturients undergoing emergency or elective cesarean section in a participating hospital, who experience insufficient regional anesthesia and conversion to general anesthesia during the 1 year inclusion period
Eligibility Criteria
The project encompasses all women at the participating centers who experience insufficient regional anesthesia during a cesarean section and conversion to general anesthesia. Based on experience, this occurs relatively infrequently, but is estimated to happen 5-10 times a year at each participating center. It is anticipated that some women may decline to participate in the project, and since cesarean sections occur at all times of the day and year, the project group may risk not identifying some cases. The number of women required to participate before a sufficient amount of information is obtained (as no new information is expected from subsequent interviews) is not known in advance; however, it is estimated that 20-30 women will need to participate. Therefore, the inclusion period is expected to last for one year.
You may qualify if:
- Women undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section, aged over 17 years
- Regional (spinal or epidural or combined epidural-spinal) anesthesia converted to general anesthesia intraoperatively (i.e., after surgery has commenced) due to insufficient regional anesthesia (i.e., not for obstetric indications, such as in cases of difficult fetal extraction)
You may not qualify if:
- Does not speak Danish or English
- Does not wish to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sygehus Lillebaeltlead
- University Hospital of North Zealandcollaborator
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlevcollaborator
- Aalborg University Hospitalcollaborator
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmarkcollaborator
- Zealand University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Viborg Hospital
Viborg, Region Midt, Denmark
Aalborg Hospital
Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Copenhagen, Denmark
Herlev Hospital
Herlev, Denmark
Hillerød Hospital
Hillerød, 3400, Denmark
Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding
Kolding, 6000, Denmark
Roskilde Hospital
Roskilde, 4000, Denmark
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2024
First Posted
November 1, 2024
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion
February 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Last Updated
August 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share