NCT06664645

Brief Summary

The increase of the population life expectancy and the active lifestyle adopted in recent years have contributed to the higher incidence of rotator cuff injuries. For large (\>3 cm) and extensive (\>5 cm) injuries of the rotator cuff, even after complete or partial repair, the chances of failure reach 94%. An alternative in rotator cuff injuries is the use of the long head of the biceps (LHB) as an autologous graft to increase the healing rate and the final outcomes. The primary objective is to compare the functional results, according to the ASES score, between patients who use or not the long head biceps brace for complete repairs of large and extensive rotator cuff tears. The secondary objectives are to compare the groups according to structural results by MRI and functional results by the UCLA score.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 14, 2022

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 11, 2024

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 14, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 14, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 26, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

October 11, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 23, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

rotator cufftendon transferbiceps reinforcementbiceps autograft

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Visual analogue score (VAS)

    Visual analogue score: it is a 10 cm line with two end points, one representing "no pain" and the other representing "worst pain". The patient marks the line to indicate their current pain level, and the distance from the "no pain" marker to the mark is measured in centimeters to provide a score. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

    24 months

  • Structural outcomes

    Patients will undergo preoperative MRI and from 6 months after the procedure. All images will be evaluated by at least two authors of the work, who will not know which group the patients belong to. The classification by Sugaya et al. stratifies the appearance of the tendon after repair into 5 types: type I (sufficient thickness with low signal in all images); type II (sufficiently thick with high focal signal); type III (insufficient thickness without discontinuity); type IV (small size tear) and type V (medium or large size tear). The healing of the long head biceps reinforcement will also be evaluated by MRI and classified as unhealed and healed.

    24 months

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

    American Shoulder and Elbow Score score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 the lowest level of function and 100 the highest level of function.

    24

  • The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA)

    Scores ranged from 0 to 35 with a score of 0 indicating worst shoulder function and 35 indicating best shoulder function.

    24 months

  • The 12 item Short Form Survey (SF-12)

    This is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. It is often used as a quality of life measure. Utilize the norm-based scoring system to interpret Physical component and Mental component scores, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores above 50 indicate a better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below 50 suggest below-average health.

    24 months

Study Arms (2)

complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement

EXPERIMENTAL

complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement

Procedure: LHB tendon reinforcement

complete repair without reinforcement

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

complete repair without reinforcement.

Procedure: complete repair without reinforcement

Interventions

complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement

complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement

conventional rotator cuff complete repair without reinforcement

complete repair without reinforcement

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Long head tendon of biceps intact;
  • Large or extensive posterosuperior rotator cuff injuries according to the classification of DeOrio and Cofield;20
  • Fatty degeneration of the ≦2 supraspinatus muscle according to the classification of Goutallier.21

You may not qualify if:

  • Active or previous infection in the affected shoulder;
  • Patients unable to understand preoperative questionnaires;
  • Patient who does not undergo at least 1 postoperative evaluation.
  • Injury where complete repair of the rotator cuff is not possible;
  • Rupture of the LHB tendon diagnosed intraoperatively.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20551-030, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Barth J, Olmos MI, Swan J, Barthelemy R, Delsol P, Boutsiadis A. Superior Capsular Reconstruction With the Long Head of the Biceps Autograft Prevents Infraspinatus Retear in Massive Posterosuperior Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1430-1438. doi: 10.1177/0363546520912220. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

    PMID: 32267730BACKGROUND
  • Rhee SM, Youn SM, Park JH, Rhee YG. Biceps Rerouting for Semirigid Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Arthroscopy. 2021 Sep;37(9):2769-2779. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

    PMID: 33892075BACKGROUND
  • Cho NS, Yi JW, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic biceps augmentation for avoiding undue tension in repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2009 Feb;25(2):183-91. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Nov 1.

    PMID: 19171279BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A prospective randomized study will be carried out in a 1:1 ratio between groups. Patients with large and extensive rotator cuff injuries will be selected at the Shoulder and Elbow clinic of Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE-UERJ), during outpatient care. Patients with an intact long head of the biceps will be randomized into two groups, according to the use or not of the tendon: complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement and complete repair without reinforcement.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2024

First Posted

October 29, 2024

Study Start

January 14, 2022

Primary Completion

April 14, 2025

Study Completion

April 14, 2025

Last Updated

June 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations