Rotator Cuff Tears Treated With Long Head of the Biceps Reinforcement
Evaluation of Rotator Cuff Repair With Long Head of the Biceps Reinforcement: a Prospective Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The increase of the population life expectancy and the active lifestyle adopted in recent years have contributed to the higher incidence of rotator cuff injuries. For large (\>3 cm) and extensive (\>5 cm) injuries of the rotator cuff, even after complete or partial repair, the chances of failure reach 94%. An alternative in rotator cuff injuries is the use of the long head of the biceps (LHB) as an autologous graft to increase the healing rate and the final outcomes. The primary objective is to compare the functional results, according to the ASES score, between patients who use or not the long head biceps brace for complete repairs of large and extensive rotator cuff tears. The secondary objectives are to compare the groups according to structural results by MRI and functional results by the UCLA score.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 14, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 14, 2025
CompletedJune 26, 2025
June 1, 2025
3.2 years
October 11, 2024
June 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Visual analogue score (VAS)
Visual analogue score: it is a 10 cm line with two end points, one representing "no pain" and the other representing "worst pain". The patient marks the line to indicate their current pain level, and the distance from the "no pain" marker to the mark is measured in centimeters to provide a score. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
24 months
Structural outcomes
Patients will undergo preoperative MRI and from 6 months after the procedure. All images will be evaluated by at least two authors of the work, who will not know which group the patients belong to. The classification by Sugaya et al. stratifies the appearance of the tendon after repair into 5 types: type I (sufficient thickness with low signal in all images); type II (sufficiently thick with high focal signal); type III (insufficient thickness without discontinuity); type IV (small size tear) and type V (medium or large size tear). The healing of the long head biceps reinforcement will also be evaluated by MRI and classified as unhealed and healed.
24 months
American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)
American Shoulder and Elbow Score score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 the lowest level of function and 100 the highest level of function.
24
The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA)
Scores ranged from 0 to 35 with a score of 0 indicating worst shoulder function and 35 indicating best shoulder function.
24 months
The 12 item Short Form Survey (SF-12)
This is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. It is often used as a quality of life measure. Utilize the norm-based scoring system to interpret Physical component and Mental component scores, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores above 50 indicate a better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below 50 suggest below-average health.
24 months
Study Arms (2)
complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement
EXPERIMENTALcomplete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement
complete repair without reinforcement
ACTIVE COMPARATORcomplete repair without reinforcement.
Interventions
complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement
conventional rotator cuff complete repair without reinforcement
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Long head tendon of biceps intact;
- Large or extensive posterosuperior rotator cuff injuries according to the classification of DeOrio and Cofield;20
- Fatty degeneration of the ≦2 supraspinatus muscle according to the classification of Goutallier.21
You may not qualify if:
- Active or previous infection in the affected shoulder;
- Patients unable to understand preoperative questionnaires;
- Patient who does not undergo at least 1 postoperative evaluation.
- Injury where complete repair of the rotator cuff is not possible;
- Rupture of the LHB tendon diagnosed intraoperatively.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20551-030, Brazil
Related Publications (3)
Barth J, Olmos MI, Swan J, Barthelemy R, Delsol P, Boutsiadis A. Superior Capsular Reconstruction With the Long Head of the Biceps Autograft Prevents Infraspinatus Retear in Massive Posterosuperior Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1430-1438. doi: 10.1177/0363546520912220. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
PMID: 32267730BACKGROUNDRhee SM, Youn SM, Park JH, Rhee YG. Biceps Rerouting for Semirigid Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Arthroscopy. 2021 Sep;37(9):2769-2779. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PMID: 33892075BACKGROUNDCho NS, Yi JW, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic biceps augmentation for avoiding undue tension in repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2009 Feb;25(2):183-91. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
PMID: 19171279BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2024
First Posted
October 29, 2024
Study Start
January 14, 2022
Primary Completion
April 14, 2025
Study Completion
April 14, 2025
Last Updated
June 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share