Post Oesophagectomy Outcomes in a Single Regional Centre in Australia
An Australian Regional Hospital's Oesophagectomy Outcomes
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Literature review/rationale for project
- Oesophageal cancer is associated with a grim prognosis despite many advances in treatment. Oesophagectomy is a key component of the care of patients who are candidates for curative treatment, however it is associated with substantial morbidity.
- Several studies have suggested that oesophagectomies performed at higher volume tertiary centres are associated with lower morbidity and mortality than lower volume centres, and this has prompted changes to policy in countries such as Great Britain, Canada and the Netherlands with regards to the centralisation of these cases. A higher volume centre within Australia is likely to perform 6 or more procedures per year.
- Currently within Australia, centralisation on a large scale has not occurred. This has been limited in part by resource provision and geographical barriers. Therefore, oesophagectomies in Australia are still routinely performed in regional centres. However, there is a paucity of recent outcomes data from these centres. Aims/objectives
- Retrospective review of oesophagectomies undertaken in a single regional centre in Tasmania, Australia over 10 years (January 2014 to December 2023)
- Assess outcomes (long and short-term complications and mortality) and compare to morbidity and mortality rates from larger international centres
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2024
CompletedNovember 5, 2024
November 1, 2024
13 days
October 21, 2024
November 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
mortality
date of death from any cause or date of palliation whichever came first
from date of surgery to end of study (November 2024) for a timeframe up to 10 years
Anastomotic leak
Grade 1-3, diagnosed radiologicaly, requiring intervention (surgical or non-surgical)
from date of surgery to end of study period (Nov 2024), assessed up to 10 years
Length of stay
total inpatient hospital stay and total ICU length stay
from date of surgery to discharge date of hospital admission, approximately 2-4 weeks in most cases but assessed up to 12 weeks
Study Arms (1)
oesophagectomy
patients who underwent oesophagectomy within the specified time frame
Interventions
No intervention - retrospective observational study
Eligibility Criteria
patients who underwent oeophagectomy at Launceston General Hospital between January 2014 to December 2023
You may qualify if:
- patients who underwent oeophagectomy at Launceston General Hospital between January 2014 to December 2023
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Launceston General Hospitallead
- Department of Health, Tasmaniacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Launceston General Hospital
Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, Australia
Related Publications (8)
Chang AC. Centralizing Esophagectomy to Improve Outcomes and Enhance Clinical Research: Invited Expert Review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Sep;106(3):916-923. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 5.
PMID: 29738757BACKGROUNDPu S, Chen H, Zhou C, Yu S, Liao X, Zhu L, He J, Wang B. Major Postoperative Complications in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:554-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
PMID: 32927322BACKGROUNDDe Silva I, Wee M, Cabalag CS, Fong R, Tran K, Wu M, Schloithe A, Bright T, Duong CP, Watson DI. Para-conduit diaphragmatic hernia following esophagectomy-the new price of minimally invasive surgery? Dis Esophagus. 2023 Apr 29;36(5):doad011. doi: 10.1093/dote/doad011.
PMID: 36912068BACKGROUNDBuchholz V, Hazard R, Lee DK, Liu DS, Zhang W, Chen S, Aly A, Barnett S, Le P, Weinberg L. Textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy: a single-centre observational study. BMC Surg. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02253-7.
PMID: 38066440BACKGROUNDEdmondson J, Hunter J, Bakis G, O'Connor A, Wood S, Qureshi AP. Understanding Post-Esophagectomy Complications and Their Management: The Early Complications. J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 11;12(24):7622. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247622.
PMID: 38137691BACKGROUNDOesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative. Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3):zrab010. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab010.
PMID: 35179183BACKGROUNDAnderson O, Ni Z, Moller H, Coupland VH, Davies EA, Allum WH, Hanna GB. Hospital volume and survival in oesophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Nov;47(16):2408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
PMID: 21835609BACKGROUNDDoran SLF, Digby MG, Green SV, Kelty CJ, Tamhankar AP. Risk factors for and treatment of anastomotic strictures after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6771-6777. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11150-w. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
PMID: 39160303BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2024
First Posted
October 29, 2024
Study Start
November 1, 2024
Primary Completion
November 14, 2024
Study Completion
November 30, 2024
Last Updated
November 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share