Biomodulation and Rehabilitation Interventions to tarGet Pelvic Health
BRIGHT
Is Multimodal Physiotherapy and/or Photobiomodulation Therapy Effective for Pain Reduction Among Those Who Experience Provoked Vestibulodynia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This trial will provide evidence for the effective management of pain and pain-related domains among those who experience provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) using photobiomodulation (PBM) and multimodal physiotherapy (mPT) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). PVD is the most common subcategory of vulvovaginal pain experienced during sexual and non-sexual activities, affects the psychological and sexual health of an astounding one in five Canadian women, yet access to evidence-informed management approaches is limited. We will employ four intervention groups: PBM, sham PBM (control), PBM combined with mPT, and mPT with sham PBM to evaluate the effectiveness of each approach on its own and the two approaches in combination. Among those who experience PVD, we seek to answer:
- 1.Relative to baseline and to sham PBM, does a 14-week intervention involving PBM, mPT, or a combination of mPT and PMB reduce vulvar pain severity reported on the Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire (VPAQ)?
- 2.Is a combined mPT and PBM intervention more effective than mPT or PMB alone when considering vulvar pain severity and/or related domains as measured through VPAQ?
- 3.Are positive changes in vulvar pain severity and related domains observed following a 14-week intervention involving PBM, mPT or a combination of PBM and mPT retained at 6 months and at 1 year?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2028
May 5, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.5 years
October 23, 2024
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire - Pain Severity
Developed by co-investigator Pukall and a subscale of the larger vulvar pain assessment questionnaire, participants report their average and worst vulvar pain intensity and associated unpleasantness and distress experienced during the previous four weeks. Scores are the the average of the items in the subscale, with the lowest possible score as 0 (Not at all) and the highest as 4 (very much). Higher score means worse symptoms
Baseline
Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire - Pain Severity
Developed by co-investigator Pukall and a subscale of the larger vulvar pain assessment questionnaire, participants report their average and worst vulvar pain intensity and associated unpleasantness and distress experienced during the previous four weeks. Scores are the the average of the items in the subscale, with the lowest possible score as 0 (Not at all) and the highest as 4 (very much). Higher score means worse symptoms
Within 2 weeks of the end of intervention
Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire - Pain Severity
Developed by co-investigator Pukall and a subscale of the larger vulvar pain assessment questionnaire, participants report their average and worst vulvar pain intensity and associated unpleasantness and distress experienced during the previous four weeks. Scores are the the average of the items in the subscale, with the lowest possible score as 0 (Not at all) and the highest as 4 (very much). Higher score means worse symptoms
6 months post start of intervention
Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire - Pain Severity
Developed by co-investigator Pukall and a subscale of the larger vulvar pain assessment questionnaire, participants report their average and worst vulvar pain intensity and associated unpleasantness and distress experienced during the previous four weeks. Scores are the the average of the items in the subscale, with the lowest possible score as 0 (Not at all) and the highest as 4 (very much). Higher score means worse symptoms
12 months post start of intervention
Secondary Outcomes (39)
Tampon Test
Baseline
Tampon Test
Within 2 weeks of the end of the intervention
Tampon Test
6 months post start of the intervention
Tampon Test
12 months post start of the intervention
Provoked vulvar pain sensitivity
Baseline
- +34 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Sham laser
SHAM COMPARATOR15 treatments will be provided over a 14 week period but at an intensity of 1% output for all sites and at all stages. Each treatment will last approximately 20 minutes. At each visit, the array will be applied to the surface of the perineum (red and infrared light), followed by treatment at specific painful sites using the red light probe.
Real laser
ACTIVE COMPARATOR15 treatments will be provided over a 14 week period. Each treatment will last approximately 20 minutes and will include the laser array first being applied to the surface of the perineum (red and infrared light) and the focal probe will be applied to painful sites on the perineum. All the stages will involve use of the same array and probe placement, but at each stage the dosage will be increased according to the BioFlex protocol.
Sham laser + multi-modal physiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATOROver 14 weeks, participants will receive 10 physiotherapy sessions and 15 sham laser sessions, lasting a total of 50 minutes. Laser and physiotherapy treatments will be delivered within the same visit where possible. For the physiotherapy, the therapist will start with education, followed by progressive relaxation exercises and deep breathing. Participants will practice graded pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contractions, manual stretching techniques with external palpation, and gradually progressing to the insertion of one or two fingers into the vagina. Finally, vaginal dilators will be used to stretch the vaginal opening and PFMs. The participant will use relaxation breathing and contraction/relaxation cycles to facilitate insertion, progressing to larger dilators as tolerated. For the sham laser, the same protocol will be followed as described in previous arms.
Laser + multi-modal physiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALThis treatment group will receive a combination therapy (i.e., both laser and physiotherapy), with each session lasting up to 50 minutes over a 14 week period. Laser and physiotherapy treatments will be delivered within the same visit where possible. Laser and physiotherapy protocols will be delivered as described in the previous arms.
Interventions
The laser therapy will be delivered in progressively higher doses, based on individual participants. Each stage will follow this sequence of applications: (1) perineum application (DUO-240 red and infrared array in the surface of the perineum) and (2) LDR-100 probe on the vestibula more generally. Doses will increase from 40%-100% power over the course of the intervention
The laser therapy will be delivered in progressively higher doses, based on individual participants tolerance. Each stage will follow this sequence of applications: (1) perineum application (DUO-240 red and infrared array in the surface of the perineum) and (2) LDR-100 probe on the vestibula more generally. . Doses will always be set to 1% power over the course of the intervention
A total of 10 sessions of multimodal physiotherapy interventions will be provided to each of the participants in the multimodal physiotherapy (mPT) and multimodal physiotherapy combined with photobiomodulation treatment (mPT+PBM) groups. In general, each session will take place in the following order:1) Subjective assessment of the condition and screening for adverse effects or deterioration of the condition, 2)Education, 3) Relaxation Techniques, 4) Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises, 5) Manual techniques, 6) exercises with accommodators, 7) Global exercises, 8) Assessment of the post-treatment condition and 9) adjustment of the weekly exercise program to be done at home. Each of these 9 treatments will be adjusted and tailored to each participant and progressed based on individual preference and response to treatment under the discretion of the study physiotherapist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Willing to travel to Ottawa area or Quebec City area
- Biologically born female older than eighteen years
- Pre-menopausal
- Not currently pregnant or pregnancy/given birth in the past six months
- Experiencing signs and symptoms consistent with provoked vestibulodynia alone or provoked vestibulodynia plus vaginismus
You may not qualify if:
- gynaecologist cannot insert a single digit intravaginally and thus the participant would be unlikely able to tolerate the assessment procedures
- other gynaecologic conditions such as lichen sclerosus, fissures, endometriosis, adenomyosis, or pelvic organ prolapse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Ottawalead
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- University of Laval, Quebec City, Canadacollaborator
- BioFlexTM Laser Therapycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Motor Function Measurement Lab
Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 1S2, Canada
Bernard Lab
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Related Publications (18)
Dargie E, Holden RR, Pukall CF. The Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire: Factor Structure, Preliminary Norms, Internal Consistency, and Test-Retest Reliability. J Sex Med. 2017 Dec;14(12):1585-1596. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.10.072.
PMID: 29198513BACKGROUNDVowles KE, Kruger ES, Bailey RW, Sowden G, Ashworth J, Hickman J, McCracken LM. Initial evaluation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire - 2. Eur J Pain. 2020 Nov;24(10):2027-2036. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1650. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
PMID: 32816389BACKGROUNDVandyken C, Hilton S. Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Central Pain Mechanisms for Female Sexual Pain. Sex Med Rev. 2017 Jan;5(1):20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
PMID: 27498209BACKGROUNDLePage K, Selk A. What Do Patients Want? A Needs Assessment of Vulvodynia Patients Attending a Vulvar Diseases Clinic. Sex Med. 2016 Dec;4(4):e242-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
PMID: 27484917BACKGROUNDBergeron S, Binik YM, Khalife S, Pagidas K, Glazer HI, Meana M, Amsel R. A randomized comparison of group cognitive--behavioral therapy, surface electromyographic biofeedback, and vestibulectomy in the treatment of dyspareunia resulting from vulvar vestibulitis. Pain. 2001 Apr;91(3):297-306. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00449-8.
PMID: 11275387BACKGROUNDLev-Sagie A, Kopitman A, Brzezinski A. Low-Level Laser Therapy for the Treatment of Provoked Vestibulodynia-A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial. J Sex Med. 2017 Nov;14(11):1403-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
PMID: 28970071BACKGROUNDDargie EE, Chamberlain SM, Pukall CF. Provoked Vestibulodynia: Diagnosis, Self-Reported Pain, and Presentation During Gynaecological Examinations. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Mar;39(3):145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.001.
PMID: 28343555BACKGROUNDMcLean L, Thibault-Gagnon S, Brooks K, Goldfinger C, Pukall C, Chamberlain S. Differences in Pelvic Morphology Between Women With and Without Provoked Vestibulodynia. J Sex Med. 2016 Jun;13(6):963-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.066.
PMID: 27215690BACKGROUNDMorin M, Bergeron S, Khalife S, Mayrand MH, Binik YM. Morphometry of the pelvic floor muscles in women with and without provoked vestibulodynia using 4D ultrasound. J Sex Med. 2014 Mar;11(3):776-85. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12367. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
PMID: 24344835BACKGROUNDGentilcore-Saulnier E, McLean L, Goldfinger C, Pukall CF, Chamberlain S. Pelvic floor muscle assessment outcomes in women with and without provoked vestibulodynia and the impact of a physical therapy program. J Sex Med. 2010 Feb;7(2 Pt 2):1003-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01642.x. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
PMID: 20059663BACKGROUNDReissing ED, Brown C, Lord MJ, Binik YM, Khalife S. Pelvic floor muscle functioning in women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Jun;26(2):107-13. doi: 10.1080/01443610400023106.
PMID: 16050536BACKGROUNDMayer TG, Neblett R, Cohen H, Howard KJ, Choi YH, Williams MJ, Perez Y, Gatchel RJ. The development and psychometric validation of the central sensitization inventory. Pain Pract. 2012 Apr;12(4):276-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00493.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
PMID: 21951710BACKGROUNDMeyer-Bahlburg HF, Dolezal C. The female sexual function index: a methodological critique and suggestions for improvement. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007 May-Jun;33(3):217-24. doi: 10.1080/00926230701267852.
PMID: 17454519BACKGROUNDRosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.
PMID: 10782451BACKGROUNDPukall CF, Young RA, Roberts MJ, Sutton KS, Smith KB. The vulvalgesiometer as a device to measure genital pressure-pain threshold. Physiol Meas. 2007 Dec;28(12):1543-50. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/12/008. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
PMID: 18057518BACKGROUNDGoldstein AT, Pukall CF, Brown C, Bergeron S, Stein A, Kellogg-Spadt S. Vulvodynia: Assessment and Treatment. J Sex Med. 2016 Apr;13(4):572-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
PMID: 27045258BACKGROUNDSpoelstra SK, Dijkstra JR, van Driel MF, Weijmar Schultz WC. Long-term results of an individualized, multifaceted, and multidisciplinary therapeutic approach to provoked vestibulodynia. J Sex Med. 2011 Feb;8(2):489-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01941.x.
PMID: 20646179BACKGROUNDHarlow BL, Stewart EG. A population-based assessment of chronic unexplained vulvar pain: have we underestimated the prevalence of vulvodynia? J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2003 Spring;58(2):82-8.
PMID: 12744420BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Linda McLean, PhD
University of Ottawa
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephanie Bernard, PhD
University of Laval
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and investigators in this 2x2 factorial clinical trial will be blinded through a process of random allocation managed by a third-party investigator who is not involved in the direct administration of treatments or outcome assessments. This third-party investigator will use a computerized randomization system to assign participants to one of the four treatment groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2024
First Posted
October 28, 2024
Study Start
March 17, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2028
Last Updated
May 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data will be available for 10 years after the publication of the study results.
- Access Criteria
- Planned use of data for systematic review or meta-analysis.
Participant data will be anonymized using ID numbers and stored on spreadsheets. Spreadsheets will be provided by email upon request and based on the planned use of the data.