Hidden Slow Conduction Ablation for Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation: Unmasking the Arrhythmogenic Substrate (Unmask-AF)
1 other identifier
interventional
212
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Over recent years, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures have demonstrated progressively enhanced efficacy and safety, resulting in a substantial increase in the number of atrial fibrillation ablations, not only as a first-line treatment but also for repeat procedures. However, there is still a notable lack of randomized evidence in this area, which limits guidance and decision-making in clinical practice. Recently, the investigators found that employing short-coupled atrial extrastimuli revealed highly fragmented or double atrial evoked electrograms (EGMs) in AF patients, termed as hidden slow conduction (HSC). Identifying HSC sites may provide insight into the early identification of the arrhythmogenic substrate, offering a potential target for ablation This multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial will include two arms: one investigational (PV reconnection + HSC) and one control (PV reconnection). All the subjects will be followed for 12 months after the ablation procedure. The aim of our study is to investigate the impact of ablating HSC sites on arrhythmia recurrence in repeat ablation procedures. The hypothesis is that the additional ablation of HSC zones may improve the freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence after repeat ablation procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Dec 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
December 12, 2024
December 1, 2024
1.8 years
August 22, 2024
December 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Atrial arrhythmias recurrence
The primary endpoint of the study aims to establish the impact of targeting HSC sites alongside PV gaps in repeat ablation procedures for patients with recurrent AF. Specifically evaluating the freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (documented AF/AT/AFL lasting at least 30s).
up to 12 moths
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Burden of atrial arrhythmias
up to 12 moths
incidence of periprocedural complications (pericardial effusion)
up to 12 months
Use of antiarrhythmic drugs
up to 12 months
incidence of periprocedural complications (peripheral complication)
up to 12 moths
incidence of periprocedural complications (transient ischemic attack or stroke)
up to 12 months
Other Outcomes (8)
Concentration of intramyocardial fat (inFAT) into the HSC points
up to 12 months
Procedure features
up to 12 months
Atrial arrhythmias first recurrence
up to 12 months
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PV reconnection + HSC ablation
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergoning pulmunary veins (PV) reconnection checking and ablation plus identification and ablation of hidden sites of slow conduction (HSC)
PV reconnection ablation only
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergoning PV reconnection checking and ablation only.
Interventions
Ablation of pulmonary veins reconnections plus the search and ablation of hidden slow conductions sites (HSC) in the left atrium. HSC sites are defined as EGMs showing highly fragmented or double electrograms in response atrial triple extrastimulus, presenting normal or fractionated electrogram in the sinus rhythm. After checking for PV's conduction breakthroughs, point-by point ablation targeting HSC-EGMs will be performed. The end point for HSC+ ablation will be reached with loss of local capture at a given lesion, pacing from the ablation catheter at high output (10V·2ms).
Each vein will be re-assessed by observing PV potentials along the PV ostia and by pacing from the distal bipole of the ablation catheter (10mA at 2ms) within the lesion set with failed capture of the left atrium. In case of PVs reconnection touch-up applications will be performed at the earliest potential site, identified by comparing far-field atrial EGM to near-field local EGM timing, until isolation will be achieved (entrance and exit block).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Recurrent paroxysmal AF (continuous AF episode lasting longer than 30 s but terminating spontaneously or with intervention within 7 days of onset), recurrent persistent AF (continuous AF episode lasting longer than 7 days but \< 1 year) and recurrent long standing persistent AF (continuous AF ≥1 year in duration, in patients where rhythm control management is being pursued)
- Previous PVI procedure
- Age \> 40 years
- Willing and capable of providing consent
- Able and willing to comply with all follow-up testing and requirements
You may not qualify if:
- Additional left atrial ablations during the previous procedures (es. posterior wall isolation, anterior line, roof line, CFAE and others)
- Acute illness, active systemic infection, or sepsis
- Presence of intracardiac thrombus, myxoma, tumor, interatrial baffle or patch or other abnormality that precludes catheter introduction or manipulation.
- Severe mitral regurgitation
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, or who are planning to become pregnant during the course of the clinical investigation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Pokushalov E, Romanov A, De Melis M, Artyomenko S, Baranova V, Losik D, Bairamova S, Karaskov A, Mittal S, Steinberg JS. Progression of atrial fibrillation after a failed initial ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison of drug therapy versus reablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;6(4):754-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000495. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
PMID: 23748210RESULTSaglietto A, Falasconi G, Soto-Iglesias D, Francia P, Penela D, Alderete J, Viveros D, Bellido AF, Franco-Ocana P, Zaraket F, Turturiello D, Marti-Almor J, Berruezo A. Assessing left atrial intramyocardial fat infiltration from computerized tomography angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2023 Dec 6;25(12):euad351. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad351.
PMID: 38011712RESULTSilva Garcia E, Lobo-Torres I, Fernandez-Armenta J, Penela D, Fernandez-Garcia M, Gomez-Lopez A, Soto-Iglesias D, Fernandez-Rivero R, Vazquez-Garcia R, Acosta J, Bisbal F, Cano-Calabria L, Berruezo A. Functional mapping to reveal slow conduction and substrate progression in atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2023 Nov 2;25(11):euad246. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad246.
PMID: 37961921RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Electrophysiology unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2024
First Posted
October 24, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
December 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12