NCT06655805

Brief Summary

The aim of the here proposed study is to assess safety, performance and provide real world evidence (RWE) of the Hamilton Medical AG automated mechanical ventilation software packages in consecutive critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
56mo left

Started Sep 2024

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress26%
Sep 2024Dec 2030

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 23, 2024

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 22, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2024

Completed
5.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2030

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2030

Last Updated

January 16, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5.8 years

First QC Date

October 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 15, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Real world dataAcute respiratory failureRespiratory supportInvasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV)Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV)High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • The primary safety endpoint is determinate by the percentage of breaths outside of the optimal and the acceptable zone during the observation period, based on the following ventilation parameters if available:

    Tidal volume (VT), maximum pressure (Pmax), oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PetCO2), Respiratory rate (RR) for spontaneous breathing subjects, Pmax-PEEP for passive ARDS subjects, driving pressure, mechanical power. The optimal and sub-optimal ranges are defined by current recommendations for different clinical conditions including normal lungs, brain injury, ARDS, and chronic hypercapnia.

    Day 0 - Day 7

  • The efficiency endpoint is determinate by the percentage of breath inside of the optimal zone during the observation period based on the following ventilation parameters if available:

    tidal volume (VT), maximum pressure (Pmax), oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PetCO2), Respiratory rate (RR) for spontaneous breathing subjects, Pmax-PEEP for passive ARDS subjects, driving pressure, mechanical power. The optimal and sub-optimal ranges are defined by current recommendations for different clinical conditions including normal lungs, brain injury, ARDS, and chronic hypercapnia.

    Day 0 - Day 7

Study Arms (1)

One cohort of consecutive patients

One cohort of consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit while on IMV or in need of HFNO, NIV lung support due to acute respiratory failure.

Device: Non-invasive ventilation, Invasive mechanical ventilation, high-flow nasal oxygen

Interventions

No intervention is intended by the nature of this observational study.

One cohort of consecutive patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit while on IMV or in need of HFNO, NIV lung support due to acute respiratory failure, or protection of the airway due to a non-respiratory life-threatening condition.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years. Any patient in need of HFNO, NIV and IMV at some time during its ICU stay.

You may not qualify if:

  • Expected to be weaned from HFNO, NIV within 2 hours. Expected to be weaned and extubated from IMV without subsequent need of HFNO or NIV support within 2 hours.
  • Expected to be transferred to another non-participating ICU within 2 hours. Moribund subject: death expected within 2 hours.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Clinics for Intensive Care Medicine, Surgical ICU

Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, 9007, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Kantonsspital Chur

Chur, Kanton Graubünden, 7000, Switzerland

RECRUITING

HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Clinics for Intensive Care Medicine, Medical ICU

Sankt Gallen, St.Gallen, 9007, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Kantonsspital Winterthur, Zentrum für Intensivmedizin

Winterthur, 8400, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (18)

  • Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.

    PMID: 26903337BACKGROUND
  • Neto AS, Simonis FD, Barbas CS, Biehl M, Determann RM, Elmer J, Friedman G, Gajic O, Goldstein JN, Linko R, Pinheiro de Oliveira R, Sundar S, Talmor D, Wolthuis EK, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROtective Ventilation Network Investigators. Lung-Protective Ventilation With Low Tidal Volumes and the Occurrence of Pulmonary Complications in Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2155-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001189.

    PMID: 26181219BACKGROUND
  • Guo L, Wang W, Zhao N, Guo L, Chi C, Hou W, Wu A, Tong H, Wang Y, Wang C, Li E. Mechanical ventilation strategies for intensive care unit patients without acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2016 Jul 22;20(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1396-0.

    PMID: 27448995BACKGROUND
  • Campbell RS, Branson RD, Johannigman JA. Adaptive support ventilation. Respir Care Clin N Am. 2001 Sep;7(3):425-40, ix. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5337(05)70049-6.

    PMID: 11517032BACKGROUND
  • Linton DM, Potgieter PD, Davis S, Fourie AT, Brunner JX, Laubscher TP. Automatic weaning from mechanical ventilation using an adaptive lung ventilation controller. Chest. 1994 Dec;106(6):1843-50. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.6.1843.

    PMID: 7988211BACKGROUND
  • Brunner JX, Iotti GA. Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV). Minerva Anestesiol. 2002 May;68(5):365-8.

    PMID: 12029247BACKGROUND
  • Arnal JM, Wysocki M, Novotni D, Demory D, Lopez R, Donati S, Granier I, Corno G, Durand-Gasselin J. Safety and efficacy of a fully closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV(R)) in sedated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective randomized crossover study. Intensive Care Med. 2012 May;38(5):781-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2548-6. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

    PMID: 22460854BACKGROUND
  • Lellouche F, Bouchard PA, Simard S, L'Her E, Wysocki M. Evaluation of fully automated ventilation: a randomized controlled study in post-cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Mar;39(3):463-71. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2799-2. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

    PMID: 23338569BACKGROUND
  • Babic SA, Chatburn RL. Laboratory Evaluation of Cuff Pressure Control Methods. Respir Care. 2020 Jan;65(1):62-67. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06728. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

    PMID: 31363001BACKGROUND
  • Blakeman T, Rodriquez D Jr, Woods J, Cox D, Elterman J, Branson R. Automated control of endotracheal tube cuff pressure during simulated flight. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Nov;81(5 Suppl 2 Proceedings of the 2015 Military Health System Research Symposium):S116-S120. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001234.

    PMID: 27602899BACKGROUND
  • OTIS AB, FENN WO, RAHN H. Mechanics of breathing in man. J Appl Physiol. 1950 May;2(11):592-607. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1950.2.11.592. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15436363BACKGROUND
  • MEAD J. The control of respiratory frequency. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 Jun 24;109:724-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb13500.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13934289BACKGROUND
  • Botta M, Wenstedt EFE, Tsonas AM, Buiteman-Kruizinga LA, van Meenen DMP, Korsten HHM, Horn J, Paulus F, Bindels AGJH, Schultz MJ, De Bie AJR. Effectiveness, safety and efficacy of INTELLiVENT-adaptive support ventilation, a closed-loop ventilation mode for use in ICU patients - a systematic review. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Nov;15(11):1403-1413. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1933450. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

    PMID: 34047244BACKGROUND
  • Buiteman-Kruizinga LA, Mkadmi HE, Serpa Neto A, Kruizinga MD, Botta M, Schultz MJ, Paulus F, van der Heiden PLJ. Effect of INTELLiVENT-ASV versus Conventional Ventilation on Ventilation Intensity in Patients with COVID-19 ARDS-An Observational Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 19;10(22):5409. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225409.

    PMID: 34830691BACKGROUND
  • Chelly J, Mazerand S, Jochmans S, Weyer CM, Pourcine F, Ellrodt O, Thieulot-Rolin N, Serbource-Goguel J, Sy O, Vong LVP, Monchi M. Automated vs. conventional ventilation in the ICU: a randomized controlled crossover trial comparing blood oxygen saturation during daily nursing procedures (I-NURSING). Crit Care. 2020 Jul 22;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03155-3.

    PMID: 32698860BACKGROUND
  • Arnal JM, Garnero A, Novotni D, Corno G, Donati SY, Demory D, Quintana G, Ducros L, Laubscher T, Durand-Gasselin J. Closed loop ventilation mode in Intensive Care Unit: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the numbers of manual ventilator setting changes. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jan;84(1):58-67. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11963-2. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

    PMID: 28679200BACKGROUND
  • Roca O, Caritg O, Santafe M, Ramos FJ, Pacheco A, Garcia-de-Acilu M, Ferrer R, Schultz MJ, Ricard JD. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022 Apr 14;26(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w.

    PMID: 35422002BACKGROUND
  • Davidson AC, Banham S, Elliott M, Kennedy D, Gelder C, Glossop A, Church AC, Creagh-Brown B, Dodd JW, Felton T, Foex B, Mansfield L, McDonnell L, Parker R, Patterson CM, Sovani M, Thomas L; BTS Standards of Care Committee Member, British Thoracic Society/Intensive Care Society Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure Guideline Development Group, On behalf of the British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. BTS/ICS guideline for the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults. Thorax. 2016 Apr;71 Suppl 2:ii1-35. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208209. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26976648BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Noninvasive Ventilation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration, ArtificialAirway ManagementTherapeuticsRespiratory Therapy

Study Officials

  • Francesca Porta, MD

    Kantonsspital Chur, Chur, Switerzland 7000

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
28 Days
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2024

First Posted

October 23, 2024

Study Start

September 23, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Last Updated

January 16, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations