Comparison Between Centrifugation Based and Membrane Based Plasma Exchange
Study of Centrifugal Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Membrane Therapeutic Plasma Exchange; a Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims at comparing centrifugation based therapeutic plasma exchange (cTPE) versus membrane based therapeutic plasma exchange (mTPE) as regards performance, effectiveness and adverse events in patients indicated for TPE.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2024
CompletedOctober 22, 2024
October 1, 2024
8 months
October 7, 2024
October 19, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Time to setup and prime the machine (in minutes)
immediately after plasma exchange procedure
Procedure time (in minutes).
immediately after plasma exchange procedure
Time to exchange 1 litre of plasma (in minutes).
immediately after plasma exchange procedure
Blood flow rate (ml/minutes)
immediately after plasma exchange procedure
Plasma removal efficiency (PRE).
Plasma removal efficiency is an established metric used to analyse the performance of an apheresis device during a TPE procedure. It represents the fraction of plasma that has been removed in a TPE procedure in relation to the plasma that has been processed.
immediately after plasma exchange procedure
Efficacy in clearance of interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha
serum level of interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor apha were assessed before and after each session of therapeutic plasma exchange
immediately after plasma exchange procedure
Adverse events
All adverse events occurring during the session were reported including any of the following * Hemolysis. * Urticaria. * Hypotension. * Hypocalcemia. * Clotting of the extracorporeal circuit. * Others.
immediately after plasma exchange procedure
Study Arms (2)
cTPE
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group performed the first session of plasma exchange by centrifugation and the second session by membrane filtration
mTPE
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group performed the first session of plasma exchange by membrane filtration and the second session by centrifugation
Interventions
comparison between the 2 methods of plasma exchange as regards efficacy, performance and adverse events. Procedure of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) : mTPE will be done by bellco hemodialysis machine (Formula 2000), while cTPE will be done by Nigale Plasma Collector (XJC 2000). The vascular access used for both types of plasma exchange will be central venous catheter inserted into the internal jugular vein, subclavian or femoral vein. Prescription of TPE The amount of plasma to be treated is usually equivalent to the patient's estimated plasma volume (EPV). Estimated plasma volume will be calculated using the following formula (Kaplan formula) in litres: * EPV = 0.07 x wt (kg) x (1 - hematocrit) in males. * EPV = 0.065 x wt (kg) x (1 - hematocrit) in females.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged more than 18 years old having indication for plasma exchange (based on American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) therapeutic category 1, 2, 3).
- Category I: includes disorders for which TPE is accepted as first-line therapy, either as primary stand-alone treatment or in conjunction with other modes of treatment. Examples include Guillain-Barre syndrome, acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and erythrocytapheresis in sickle cell diseases with certain complications (eg, stroke).
- Category II: includes disorders for which TPE is accepted as second-line therapy, either as a stand-alone treatment or in conjunction with other modes of treatment. Examples include life-threatening hemolytic anemia for cold agglutinin disease or Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.
- Category III: includes disorders for which the optimum role of apheresis therapy is not established. Decision making should be individualized. Examples include TPE for hyper-triglyceridemic pancreatitis or extracorporeal photopheresis for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
- Approval to sign a written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Alexandria university, Faculty of medicine
Alexandria, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Elghoneimy HA, Elkader MMA, Saad NLM, Tawfiq AA, El-Wakil HS. Study of Centrifugal Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Membrane Therapeutic Plasma Exchange; A Comparative Study. Ther Apher Dial. 2025 Dec 21. doi: 10.1002/1744-9987.70104. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41422826DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hesham A Elghoneimy, MD
Department of internal medicine, nephrology unit, Alexandria faculty of medicine, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2024
First Posted
October 22, 2024
Study Start
January 5, 2023
Primary Completion
September 10, 2023
Study Completion
December 8, 2023
Last Updated
October 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share