NCT06651658

Brief Summary

Thermal ablation is an established treatment for lung cancer. It involves insertion of a applicator under image guidance into a lung tumour and destroying it with radiofrequency, microwave or cryotherapy. One of the common side effects is pneumothorax, which is a leak of gas from the lungs when it punctured. Air leak necessitates placement of a drainage tube in more than half of patients undergoing the procedure. The drain can be associated with some morbidity including pain, reduced mobility, prolonged hospital stay and infection Pleural embolization refers to the injection of substances to the linings of the lung to seal air leakage. There is published evidence in using pleural embolization with autologous blood (blood drawn up from the patient's veins) to prevent pneumothorax in patients undergoing lung biopsies. This technique is also known as pleural blood patch (PBP). A study involving more than 4000 patients found that PBP reduced the rates of pneumothorax by 35% and drain placement by 55% in lung patients. A study using prophylactic gelfoam torpedo embolization for radiofrequency ablation showed significant reduction in chest drain rates. In this study, investigators plan to evaluate the PBP using a tandem needle technique in patients undergoing lung ablation at the Oxford Thermal Ablation Service, one of the largest units in the country performing about 200 ablations per year, mostly microwave ablations. Patients will be randomized to receive lung ablation with or without the PBP. The PBP technique is easy to learn, enjoys high technical success rates and does not expose the patient to any significant additional risk. The primary outcome is the chest drains rates in the two trial groups:

  1. 1.patients undergoing lung ablation without PBP and
  2. 2.patients undergoing lung ablation with PBP. Other outcomes that would be measured include the volume of gas leakage on Computed Tomography (CT) imaging, safety profile, length of stay, feasibility of same day discharge, patient oriented outcomes including validated pain score, and institution oriented outcomes including medical costs.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
106

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable lung-cancer

Timeline
16mo left

Started Nov 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable lung-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress52%
Nov 2024Sep 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 17, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 24, 2024

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 4, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

October 17, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

lung cancerlung metastaseslung ablationpleural embolisationPleural blood patch

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Perioperative chest drain insertion

    To compare the rates of clinically important pneumothorax in patients undergoing lung ablation with or without pleural blood patch embolisation Chest drain rates (%) are expressed in means and standard deviations.

    (<24 hours)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Pneumothorax volume on immediate post ablation CT imaging

    Immediate post operative

  • Technical success in interventional group

    immediate post operative

  • Adverse events deemed due to PBP

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  • Pain score

    Assessed at discharge, typically day after procedure

  • Length of stay

    Assessed at discharge, typically day after procedure

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Lung ablation only

NO INTERVENTION

Patients proceed to standard of care treatment with lung ablation as deemed clinically appropriate

Lung ablation with pleural embolisation

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition of standard of care lung ablation, patients undergo pleural blood patch embolisation during withdrawal of the ablation probe

Procedure: Pleural embolisation

Interventions

Administration of pleural blood patch with tandem needle technique

Lung ablation with pleural embolisation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinically indicated for lung ablation.
  • Willing and capable of giving informed consent.
  • Aged 18 years or above.

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to proceed to lung ablation procedure.
  • or more lung lesions to be ablated in the same setting.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Oxford, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Li YL, Tan Y, Shah R, Harris V, Dmytriw A, Gleeson F, Scott S, Lyon P, Anderson EM. Tandem Needle Technique Pleural Blood Patch Embolisation for Lung Ablations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Dec 14. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04301-6. Online ahead of print.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Dr Yan-Lin Li Consultant Interventional Radiologist, EBIR FRCR FHKAM

    Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/ University of Oxford

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Dr Yan-Lin Li Consultant Interventional Radiologist, EBIR FRCR FHKAM

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomised controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2024

First Posted

October 22, 2024

Study Start

November 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations