Oxford Pleural Embolisation Trial
OxPET
Pleural Blood Patch for Lung Ablation: a Randomised Trial (Oxford Pleural Embolisation Trial - OxPET)
1 other identifier
interventional
106
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Thermal ablation is an established treatment for lung cancer. It involves insertion of a applicator under image guidance into a lung tumour and destroying it with radiofrequency, microwave or cryotherapy. One of the common side effects is pneumothorax, which is a leak of gas from the lungs when it punctured. Air leak necessitates placement of a drainage tube in more than half of patients undergoing the procedure. The drain can be associated with some morbidity including pain, reduced mobility, prolonged hospital stay and infection Pleural embolization refers to the injection of substances to the linings of the lung to seal air leakage. There is published evidence in using pleural embolization with autologous blood (blood drawn up from the patient's veins) to prevent pneumothorax in patients undergoing lung biopsies. This technique is also known as pleural blood patch (PBP). A study involving more than 4000 patients found that PBP reduced the rates of pneumothorax by 35% and drain placement by 55% in lung patients. A study using prophylactic gelfoam torpedo embolization for radiofrequency ablation showed significant reduction in chest drain rates. In this study, investigators plan to evaluate the PBP using a tandem needle technique in patients undergoing lung ablation at the Oxford Thermal Ablation Service, one of the largest units in the country performing about 200 ablations per year, mostly microwave ablations. Patients will be randomized to receive lung ablation with or without the PBP. The PBP technique is easy to learn, enjoys high technical success rates and does not expose the patient to any significant additional risk. The primary outcome is the chest drains rates in the two trial groups:
- 1.patients undergoing lung ablation without PBP and
- 2.patients undergoing lung ablation with PBP. Other outcomes that would be measured include the volume of gas leakage on Computed Tomography (CT) imaging, safety profile, length of stay, feasibility of same day discharge, patient oriented outcomes including validated pain score, and institution oriented outcomes including medical costs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Nov 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 24, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
February 4, 2026
February 1, 2026
2.1 years
October 17, 2024
February 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perioperative chest drain insertion
To compare the rates of clinically important pneumothorax in patients undergoing lung ablation with or without pleural blood patch embolisation Chest drain rates (%) are expressed in means and standard deviations.
(<24 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Pneumothorax volume on immediate post ablation CT imaging
Immediate post operative
Technical success in interventional group
immediate post operative
Adverse events deemed due to PBP
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Pain score
Assessed at discharge, typically day after procedure
Length of stay
Assessed at discharge, typically day after procedure
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lung ablation only
NO INTERVENTIONPatients proceed to standard of care treatment with lung ablation as deemed clinically appropriate
Lung ablation with pleural embolisation
EXPERIMENTALIn addition of standard of care lung ablation, patients undergo pleural blood patch embolisation during withdrawal of the ablation probe
Interventions
Administration of pleural blood patch with tandem needle technique
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinically indicated for lung ablation.
- Willing and capable of giving informed consent.
- Aged 18 years or above.
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to proceed to lung ablation procedure.
- or more lung lesions to be ablated in the same setting.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Oxford, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Li YL, Tan Y, Shah R, Harris V, Dmytriw A, Gleeson F, Scott S, Lyon P, Anderson EM. Tandem Needle Technique Pleural Blood Patch Embolisation for Lung Ablations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Dec 14. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04301-6. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41392212DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Yan-Lin Li Consultant Interventional Radiologist, EBIR FRCR FHKAM
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/ University of Oxford
Central Study Contacts
Dr Yan-Lin Li Consultant Interventional Radiologist, EBIR FRCR FHKAM
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2024
First Posted
October 22, 2024
Study Start
November 24, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share