NCT06651242

Brief Summary

The purpose of this stuidy are: (1) to explore the information needs of parents having children with cancer when making treatment decisions; (2) to develop a Taiwan version of the Control Preferences Scale for decision support aids; (3) to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of involving minor cancer patients and their parents in treatment decision-making.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
15mo left

Started Oct 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress74%
Oct 2022Jul 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 26, 2022

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 18, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2024

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2027

Last Updated

August 28, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

October 18, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Minor CancerParentsDecision PreferencesDecision SupportIntervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Exploring decision-making preferences among parents and minor using the Control Preferences Scale (CPS)

    The CPS is a method for assessing individual preferences in medical decision-making roles, consisting of five options that represent five different roles. (A) I prefer to make the decision about which treatment I will receive, (B) I prefer to make the final decision about my treatment after seriously considering my doctor's opinion, (C) I prefer that my doctor and I share responsibility for deciding which treatment is best for me, (D) I prefer that my doctor makes the final decision about which treatment will be used, but seriously considers my opinion, (E) I prefer to leave all decisions regarding treatment to my doctor. The five responses are classified into three categories representing active(A and B), collaborative (C) and passive (D and E) decision-making preference.

    baseline and 1.3.6 months

  • Exploring the perceived involvement in decision-making among parents and minor using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS)

    This scale comprises 13 items and is divided into three subscales, which measure physician facilitation (4 items), patient information acquisition (4 items), and patient decision-making involvement (4 items). A 5-point Likert scale is used, where higher scores indicate greater perceived involvement in decision-making.

    baseline and 1.3.6 months

  • Exploring decision-making experiences of parents and minor using the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS)

    This scale consists of 16 items, with the first 12 items assessing decision experiences, including uncertainty, understanding of information, unclear values, support during the decision-making process, and satisfaction with decisions. It uses a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater decision conflict.

    baseline and 1.3.6 months

  • Exploring perceived family adaptability and cohesion among parents and minor using the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales IV (FACES IV)

    The evaluation of family functioning involves: (1) Balanced Scales: Cohesion and Flexibility, (2) Unbalanced Scales: Disengaged, Enmeshed, Rigid, and Chaotic, (3) Family Communication, and (4) Family Satisfaction. The instrument consists of eight subscales with a total of 62 items, rated on a five-point Likert scale. The Family Cohesion and Flexibility scales include 42 items (0-42), divided into six sections with scores ranging from 7 to 35 per section. The Family Communication scale, which assesses positive communication and openness, contains 10 items (43-52) with scores ranging from 10 to 50. The Family Satisfaction scale, measuring satisfaction with cohesion, flexibility, and communication, also has 10 items (53-62), scoring from 10 to 50. Higher scores on Cohesion and Flexibility suggest a healthier family system; higher scores on Disengaged, Enmeshed, Rigid, and Chaotic indicate dysfunction; higher scores on Communication and Satisfaction denote more positive perceptions.

    baseline and 1.3.6 months

  • Exploring minor' coping behaviors in response to illness and treatment using the Paediatric Cancer Coping Scale

    This scale consists of 33 items, scored from 0 ("never") to 3 ("often"). Higher scores indicate more frequent coping behaviors.

    baseline and 1.3.6 months

  • Exploring minor' anxiety levels using the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale-2 (RCMAS-2)

    This 49-item scale assesses four dimensions: defensiveness, physiological anxiety, worry, social anxiety, and performance anxiety. Responses are either "yes" (indicating the presence of a symptom) or "no" (indicating the absence of a symptom).

    baseline and 1.3.6 months

  • Exploring parental anxiety under different characteristics using the State-trait anxiety inventory (STAT)

    This scale consists of 20 items measuring individual anxiety traits under different characteristics. It uses a 4-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.

    baseline and 1.3.6 months

Study Arms (2)

Decision-making information aids

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Decision-making information aids

Routine care

SHAM COMPARATOR
Other: Routine care

Interventions

Provide a decision-making information aids to assist patients and their parents in treatment decision making.

Decision-making information aids

Routine care

Routine care

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 20 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age over 20 years.
  • Child under 20 years old, diagnosed with cancer by a doctor.
  • their child know her/his cancer diagnosis.
  • Agree to have the child participate in family meeting and have ability to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
  • Aged between 7 and 20 years, diagnosed with pediatrtic cancer.
  • Aware of their cancer diagnosis.
  • Able to express their thoughts to the researcher in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
  • Both the minor and their legal guardian consent to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with depression, and/or anxiety, and/or other mental disorders.
  • Legal guardian is unwilling to inform the minor of their diagnosis.
  • Minor is unwilling to share their thoughts with their parents.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kaohsiung Medical University

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2024

First Posted

October 21, 2024

Study Start

October 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Last Updated

August 28, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations