Comparison of the Efficacy of Pirfenidone and Nintedanipine in Pulmonary Fibrosis
Comparison of the Effects of Nintedanib and Pirfenidone on Pulmonary Function Test Parameters and Radiological Findingsin Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis
1 other identifier
observational
152
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare the effects of pirfenidone and nintedanib on lung function and radiologic findings in fibrotic lung diseases. The main question it aims to answer is: • Do these two drugs have equivalent effects on progression in patients with pulmonary fibrosis? If there is a comparison group: The investigators will compare patients with pulmonary fibrosis receiving pirfenidone with patients with pulmonary fibrosis receiving nintedanip. The investigators will compare patients with pulmonary fibrosis receiving pirfenidone and patients with pulmonary fibrosis receiving nintedanip. Pulmonary function test parameters at 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months and differences of 6 MWT parameters compared to baseline will be compared between the two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2024
CompletedOctober 21, 2024
October 1, 2024
3 months
October 17, 2024
October 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of pulmonary function test parameters of pirfenidone and nintedanip groups after 1-year follow-up
SFT values at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months were compared with baseline values and the difference between the two groups was analyzed.
January 1 2010 and December 31 2022
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
Pirfenidone Group
Group 2
Nintedanibe Group
Eligibility Criteria
The patients who were started Pirfenidone or Nintedanib treatment with the diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis or Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis according to An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice guideline and treated for at least one year in our department between January 1 2010 and December 31 2022 The included patients had not previously used steroids or similar drugs for lung disease
You may qualify if:
- The patients who were started Pirfenidone or Nintedanib treatment with the diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis or Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis according to An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice guideline and treated for at least one year in our department between January 1 2010 and December 31 2022 The included patients had not previously used steroids or similar drugs for lung disease.
- Patients aged 18 years who have not used steroids or similar medication after diagnosis
You may not qualify if:
- Patients whose radiologic and PFT data at initial presentation were not available -Patients whose treatment was discontinued before 1 year due to side effects or unresponsiveness or death
- Patients who were switched between the two drugs before 1 year had elapsed
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
1. Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Chest Diseases
Trabzon, 61100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Johannson KA, Strambu I, Ravaglia C, Grutters JC, Valenzuela C, Mogulkoc N, Luppi F, Richeldi L, Wells AU, Vancheri C, Kreuter M; Erice ILD Working Group. Antacid therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: more questions than answers? Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Jul;5(7):591-598. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30219-9.
PMID: 28664861BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olcay Aycicek, Asist Prof
1. Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Chest Diseases
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asist Proof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2024
First Posted
October 21, 2024
Study Start
June 15, 2024
Primary Completion
August 30, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10