NCT06647186

Brief Summary

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of Non-Incised Papillae Surgical Approach (NIPSA) versus conventional flap with mineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA) in periodontal reconstructive surgery of intrabony defects (Clinical and Radiographic study). Patients and methods: Twenty patients with stage III/IV periodontitis with vertical intraosseous defect treated with NIPSA plus FDBA (n=10) or Conventional flap plus FDBA (n=10) were analysed. All patients met the same inclusion criteria and were treated following the same protocol, except for the surgical management of soft tissue (NIPSA versus Conventional flap). Clinical parameters were assessed at baseline, three months and sixmonths. Radiographic parameters were assessed at baseline and six months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 12, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 17, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 17, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

October 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 16, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

PeriodontitisPeriodontal regeneration

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Gingival Recession

    Three and six months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Location of the tip of the papilla

    Three and six months

  • Width of keratenized tissue

    Three and six months

  • Probing depth reduction

    Three and six months

  • Clinical attachment gain

    Three and six months

  • Plaque index

    Three and six months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Study group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ten patients treated with Non-Incised Papillae Surgical Approach (NIPSA) plus Allograft bone substitute

Procedure: Non Incised Papillae Surgical Approach

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ten patients treated with Conventional Flap plus Allograft bone substitute

Procedure: Conventional flap design

Interventions

Ten patients were included in this group, phase I therapy (scaling, root planing and oral hygiene measures) was performed. A single horizontal or oblique incision was made in the mucosa located on the cortical bone tissue, apical to the intrabony defect. The mesiodistal extension of the incision was sufficient to allow access to the defect. Tissue coronal to the incision was raised to full thickness from the incision line to expose the bone peaks delimiting the intrabony defect. The granulation tissue was removed from the bone walls of the defect. Dental plaque and calculus deposits were removed from the root surface with ultrasonic scaler tips and micro-minicurettes. A solution of 24% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was applied to the root surface for 2 min, irrigation with saline solution then allograft bone material was packed into the periodontal defect. The incision was sutured with horizontal internal mattress sutures then simple interrupted sutures.

Also known as: NIPSA
Study group

Ten patients were included in this group, phase I therapy (scaling, root planing and oral hygiene measures) was performed. Intrasulcular incision was made splitting the buccal papilla from the palatal papilla. All defects were approached by elevating a flap only on the buccal side and leaving the oral portion of the interdental supracrestal soft tissues undetached. The full-thickness elevation of the marginal portion of the flap was performed with a microsurgical periosteal elevator. After removal of granulation tissue from the bone walls of the defect, root and defect debridement was performed with manual and mechanical (ultrasonic) instruments with tips for subgingival instrumentation. A solution of 24% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was applied to the root surface for 2 min, irrigation with saline solution then allograft bone material was packed into the periodontal defect. The incision was sutured with simple interrupted sutures.

Also known as: Single flap approach
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with stage III/IV periodontitis.
  • Age Group between 30 to 50 years old.
  • Active residual pockets (positive bleeding on probing) associated with intrabony defects.
  • Periodontal lesions with probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm and extension of the intrabony defect ≥ 3 mm.
  • Vertical intrabony periodontal defects, always involving the buccal aspect.

You may not qualify if:

  • Systemic disease contraindicating periodontal surgery.
  • Smokers.
  • Diabetic patients.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Third molars or teeth with incorrect endodontic or restorative treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura Univesity

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone LossPeriodontitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone ResorptionBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPeriodontal AtrophyPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Professor Una Mohamed ElShinnawi

    Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The patients were randomly selected into either study group (NIPSA) or control group (Conventional falp) using the coin toss method. Hence the study groups were classified into two groups as follows, group I (study group): ten patients treated with NIPSA plus FDBA and group II (Control group): ten patients treated with conventional flap design plus FDBA.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2024

First Posted

October 17, 2024

Study Start

June 12, 2023

Primary Completion

December 20, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2024

Last Updated

October 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Locations