NCT06644963

Brief Summary

Myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and devices like Impella® CP and Impella 5.0-5.5 are often used for hemodynamic support, either alone or combined with veno-arterial ECMO (ECMELLA). While recent studies suggest improved survival with Impella® in cardiogenic shock, complications remain common, particularly due to deep arterial access and the need for anticoagulation. Hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) such as ischemia, bleeding (44%), hemolysis (32%), and stroke (13%) frequently occur. Achieving hemocompatibility between the patient's blood and the device is challenging, as pump flow, anticoagulation, and patient factors contribute to both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. Despite advances, further research is required to better understand and reduce these risks in clinical practice.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
800

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
13 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 9, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 16, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

October 16, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

13 years

First QC Date

October 9, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 15, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

ImpellapVADBleedingThrombosishemocompatibily related adverse events

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hemocompatibility related adverse events (HRAEs)

    Incidence of HRAEs with Impella (CP and/or 5 - 5.5) : Bleeding events (BARC \>3b) and Thrombosis events ( ischemic stroke + pump thrombosis)

    From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Early mortality

    From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month

  • Adverse events related to Impella devices

    From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge assessed up to 3 month

  • Duration of mechanical ventilation

    From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month

  • Lengh of stay

    From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month

  • Cardiac long-term project

    From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge assessed up to 3 month

Interventions

Impella (5, 5.5 or CP) as an isolated circulatory support or combined with others Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

All adult patients admitted for cardiogenic shock supported by Impella (5, 5.5 or CP) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022 (as an isolated circulatory support or combined with others Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients admitted for cardiogenic shock supported by Impella (5, 5.5 or CP) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022 (as an isolated circulatory support or combined with others Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support)

You may not qualify if:

  • Absence of Impella
  • Impella 2.5
  • Impella RP (right)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Montpellier university hospital

Montpellier, 34295, France

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Van Edom CJ, Gramegna M, Baldetti L, Beneduce A, Castelein T, Dauwe D, Frederiks P, Giustino G, Jacquemin M, Janssens SP, Panoulas VF, Poss J, Rosenberg A, Schaubroeck HAI, Schrage B, Tavazzi G, Vanassche T, Vercaemst L, Vlasselaers D, Vranckx P, Belohlavek J, Gorog DA, Huber K, Mebazaa A, Meyns B, Pappalardo F, Scandroglio AM, Stone GW, Westermann D, Chieffo A, Price S, Vandenbriele C. Management of Bleeding and Hemolysis During Percutaneous Microaxial Flow Pump Support: A Practical Approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 24;16(14):1707-1720. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.043.

  • Vandenbriele C, Arachchillage DJ, Frederiks P, Giustino G, Gorog DA, Gramegna M, Janssens S, Meyns B, Polzin A, Scandroglio M, Schrage B, Stone GW, Tavazzi G, Vanassche T, Vranckx P, Westermann D, Price S, Chieffo A. Anticoagulation for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device-Supported Cardiogenic Shock: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 17;79(19):1949-1962. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.052.

  • Philipson DJ, Cohen DJ, Fonarow GC, Ziaeian B. Analysis of Adverse Events Related to Impella Usage (from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience and National Inpatient Sample Databases). Am J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;140:91-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.056. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

  • Amin AP, Spertus JA, Curtis JP, Desai N, Masoudi FA, Bach RG, McNeely C, Al-Badarin F, House JA, Kulkarni H, Rao SV. The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory Support. Circulation. 2020 Jan 28;141(4):273-284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044007. Epub 2019 Nov 17.

  • Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ, Hurley NC, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP, Berkowitz A, Masoudi FA, Messenger JC, Parzynski CS, Ngufor C, Girotra S, Amin AP, Shah ND, Desai NR. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.

  • Moller JE, Engstrom T, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Frydland M, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Sorensen R, Lonborg J, Lindholm MG, Udesen NLJ, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Christiansen EH, Linke A, Woitek FJ, Westenfeld R, Mobius-Winkler S, Wachtell K, Ravn HB, Lassen JF, Boesgaard S, Gerke O, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shock, CardiogenicHemorrhageThrombosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesInfarctionIschemiaPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNecrosisShockEmbolism and Thrombosis

Study Officials

  • Aurore UGHETTO, MD

    Montpellier University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Clément DELMAS, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2024

First Posted

October 16, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

January 1, 2023

Study Completion

January 30, 2025

Last Updated

October 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Locations