IMPELLA, Complications and Tolerance
IMPACT
1 other identifier
observational
800
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and devices like Impella® CP and Impella 5.0-5.5 are often used for hemodynamic support, either alone or combined with veno-arterial ECMO (ECMELLA). While recent studies suggest improved survival with Impella® in cardiogenic shock, complications remain common, particularly due to deep arterial access and the need for anticoagulation. Hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) such as ischemia, bleeding (44%), hemolysis (32%), and stroke (13%) frequently occur. Achieving hemocompatibility between the patient's blood and the device is challenging, as pump flow, anticoagulation, and patient factors contribute to both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. Despite advances, further research is required to better understand and reduce these risks in clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2025
CompletedOctober 16, 2024
October 1, 2024
13 years
October 9, 2024
October 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hemocompatibility related adverse events (HRAEs)
Incidence of HRAEs with Impella (CP and/or 5 - 5.5) : Bleeding events (BARC \>3b) and Thrombosis events ( ischemic stroke + pump thrombosis)
From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Early mortality
From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month
Adverse events related to Impella devices
From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge assessed up to 3 month
Duration of mechanical ventilation
From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month
Lengh of stay
From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month
Cardiac long-term project
From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge assessed up to 3 month
Interventions
Impella (5, 5.5 or CP) as an isolated circulatory support or combined with others Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
Eligibility Criteria
All adult patients admitted for cardiogenic shock supported by Impella (5, 5.5 or CP) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022 (as an isolated circulatory support or combined with others Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support)
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients admitted for cardiogenic shock supported by Impella (5, 5.5 or CP) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022 (as an isolated circulatory support or combined with others Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support)
You may not qualify if:
- Absence of Impella
- Impella 2.5
- Impella RP (right)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Montpellier university hospital
Montpellier, 34295, France
Related Publications (6)
Van Edom CJ, Gramegna M, Baldetti L, Beneduce A, Castelein T, Dauwe D, Frederiks P, Giustino G, Jacquemin M, Janssens SP, Panoulas VF, Poss J, Rosenberg A, Schaubroeck HAI, Schrage B, Tavazzi G, Vanassche T, Vercaemst L, Vlasselaers D, Vranckx P, Belohlavek J, Gorog DA, Huber K, Mebazaa A, Meyns B, Pappalardo F, Scandroglio AM, Stone GW, Westermann D, Chieffo A, Price S, Vandenbriele C. Management of Bleeding and Hemolysis During Percutaneous Microaxial Flow Pump Support: A Practical Approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 24;16(14):1707-1720. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.043.
PMID: 37495347RESULTVandenbriele C, Arachchillage DJ, Frederiks P, Giustino G, Gorog DA, Gramegna M, Janssens S, Meyns B, Polzin A, Scandroglio M, Schrage B, Stone GW, Tavazzi G, Vanassche T, Vranckx P, Westermann D, Price S, Chieffo A. Anticoagulation for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device-Supported Cardiogenic Shock: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 17;79(19):1949-1962. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.052.
PMID: 35550692RESULTPhilipson DJ, Cohen DJ, Fonarow GC, Ziaeian B. Analysis of Adverse Events Related to Impella Usage (from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience and National Inpatient Sample Databases). Am J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;140:91-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.056. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
PMID: 33147430RESULTAmin AP, Spertus JA, Curtis JP, Desai N, Masoudi FA, Bach RG, McNeely C, Al-Badarin F, House JA, Kulkarni H, Rao SV. The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory Support. Circulation. 2020 Jan 28;141(4):273-284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044007. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
PMID: 31735078RESULTDhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ, Hurley NC, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP, Berkowitz A, Masoudi FA, Messenger JC, Parzynski CS, Ngufor C, Girotra S, Amin AP, Shah ND, Desai NR. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
PMID: 32040163RESULTMoller JE, Engstrom T, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Frydland M, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Sorensen R, Lonborg J, Lindholm MG, Udesen NLJ, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Christiansen EH, Linke A, Woitek FJ, Westenfeld R, Mobius-Winkler S, Wachtell K, Ravn HB, Lassen JF, Boesgaard S, Gerke O, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
PMID: 38587239RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aurore UGHETTO, MD
Montpellier University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2024
First Posted
October 16, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2023
Study Completion
January 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10