NCT06637670

Brief Summary

This study aims to explore how kinesiology taping affects people with mild to moderate meniscus injuries (grades I/II), focusing on pain, movement fears, muscle strength, balance, joint movement, and quality of life. Two groups will be involved: one will receive kinesiology taping on the thigh muscle with some tension, while the other will receive a placebo tape with no tension. Researchers will measure various factors, including pain and muscle strength, both before and 48-72 hours after taping.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 3, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 15, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

October 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 9, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

kinesiology tapingpainquality of lifemeniscus injury

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain

    Pain assessment was made with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The patient was asked to mark where his or her pain was on the scale by writing "0: No pain, 10: Unbearable pain" at the two ends of the 10-centimeter scale.

    Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  • Knee extension muscle strength

    A hand dynamometer (MicroFet 2 HHD) was used to measure the patients' knee extension muscle strength. Measurements were recorded in kilograms. For measurement, the patient was positioned without support, with his legs hanging off the bed from the knees, knees flexed at 90°, feet free and arms crossed over the shoulders. During the measurement, the thigh to be measured was stabilized with one hand after the patients completed maximum knee extension.

    Baseline and 48 hours after the application

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Fear of movement

    Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  • Proprioceptive force sense

    Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  • Joint range of motion

    Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  • Joint position sense

    Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  • Quality of life

    Baseline and 48 hours after the application

Study Arms (2)

The experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group was applied 'Y shaped' kinesiology taping on quadriceps femoris muscle, based on facilitation technique with 25-50% stretching.

Other: Kinesiology taping

The placebo group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

This group was applied a tape without tension, perpendicular to the quadriceps femoris muscle

Other: Placebo taping

Interventions

'Y shaped' kinesiology taping was applied on quadriceps femoris muscle, based on facilitation technique with 25-50% stretching.

The experimental group

A tape without tension was applied perpendicular on the quadriceps femoris muscle.

The placebo group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with meniscus grade I/II,
  • Who agreed to participate in the study
  • Signed the voluntary consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant individuals
  • Individuals with additional knee injuries (e.g., ligament tears) or chronic conditions affecting the knee (e.g., arthritis).
  • Patients with grade III meniscus tears or more severe injuries.
  • Who had knee surgery in the last 6 months.
  • Patients with skin conditions or allergies to adhesive materials or kinesiology tape.
  • Individuals with neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Amasya University

Amasya, Merkez, 05100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Williams S, Whatman C, Hume PA, Sheerin K. Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries: a meta-analysis of the evidence for its effectiveness. Sports Med. 2012 Feb 1;42(2):153-64. doi: 10.2165/11594960-000000000-00000.

    PMID: 22124445BACKGROUND
  • Weiss CB, Lundberg M, Hamberg P, DeHaven KE, Gillquist J. Non-operative treatment of meniscal tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Jul;71(6):811-22.

    PMID: 2745476BACKGROUND
  • Reicher MA, Hartzman S, Duckwiler GR, Bassett LW, Anderson LJ, Gold RH. Meniscal injuries: detection using MR imaging. Radiology. 1986 Jun;159(3):753-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.159.3.3754645.

    PMID: 3754645BACKGROUND
  • Ageberg E. Consequences of a ligament injury on neuromuscular function and relevance to rehabilitation - using the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee as model. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002 Jun;12(3):205-12. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00022-6.

    PMID: 12086815BACKGROUND
  • Spindler KP, Schils JP, Bergfeld JA, Andrish JT, Weiker GG, Anderson TE, Piraino DW, Richmond BJ, Medendorp SV. Prospective study of osseous, articular, and meniscal lesions in recent anterior cruciate ligament tears by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;21(4):551-7. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100412.

    PMID: 8368416BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2024

First Posted

October 15, 2024

Study Start

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion

August 1, 2023

Study Completion

August 1, 2024

Last Updated

October 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations