Comparing Double VS Quadruple Flap for Securing Ball Implants After Eye Ball Evisceration
Evaluating the Efficacy of Double Flap Versus Quadruple Flap Techniques in Stabilizing Ball Implants Post-Evisceration: a Comparative Analysis
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this interventional study is to compare the efficacy and outcomes of the double flap and quadruple flap closure techniques in securing ball implants after evisceration. Specific objectives include:
- 1.Assessing the rate of implant migration and extrusion.
- 2.Evaluating the long-term stability of the implant within the scleral shell.
- 3.Investigating the occurrence of complications such as exposure or infection.
- 4.Analyzing the functional and anatomical outcomes of the closure techniques.
- 5.Comparing patient satisfaction and quality of life measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2024
CompletedOctober 10, 2024
October 1, 2024
7 months
October 9, 2024
October 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluating the post-operative extrusion rates of the ball implant from the scleral shell
The primary outcome measure was implant stability, assessed clinically and through imaging at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively to review any signs of implant migration or extrusion as well as signs of conjunctival erosion.
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Postoperative pain
From enrollment to the end of the follow up period after 6 months
Postoperative complications
From enrollment to the end of the follow up period after 6 months
Patient satisfaction with implant motility
From enrollment to the end of the follow up period after 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Double scleral flap
EXPERIMENTALDouble Flap Technique (Group A) A 360-degree peritomy will be performed to expose the underlying sclera. Following evisceration of the ocular contents, careful hemostasis will be achieved. Two muscular-tendinous flaps will be developed from the horizontal rectus muscles. These flaps will be dissected under minimal tension to preserve their vascular supply. The prepared flaps will be draped over the implant in a manner that the edges slightly overlap, ensuring complete coverage. The flaps will be sutured together using silk sutures, securing the implant in place.The conjunctiva will be meticulously closed over the muscle flaps with continuous absorbable sutures to enhance the healing process and minimize postoperative discomfort.
Quadruple scleral flap
EXPERIMENTALQuadruple flap technique involves creating four scleral flaps, which proponents argue provides a more robust framework for securing the implant. This technique is designed to enhance the integration of the implant with surrounding orbital structures, thereby potentially reducing the risk of exposure and improving cosmetic outcomes. The quadruple flap method is suggested to better preserve the orbital anatomy, allowing for superior distribution of volume and more natural prosthetic motility.
Interventions
Quadruple Flap Technique (Group B) A 360-degree peritomy will be performed to expose the underlying sclera. Following evisceration of the ocular contents, careful hemostasis will be achieved. Four muscular-tendinous flaps will be developed from the recti muscles. These flaps will be dissected under minimal tension to preserve their vascular supply. The prepared flaps will be draped over the implant in a manner that the edges slightly overlap, ensuring complete coverage. The flaps will be sutured together using silk sutures, securing the implant in place.The conjunctiva will be meticulously closed over the muscle flaps with continuous absorbable sutures to enhance the healing process and minimize postoperative discomfort.
The double flap technique, which involves the creation of two scleral flaps to encase and secure the implant, has been a standard approach in many surgical settings. This method aims to cover the implant adequately, thereby minimizing exposure risks and enhancing the potential for implant motility.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Diagnosed with conditions necessitating evisceration with implant
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Previous ocular surgery affecting orbital anatomy
- Systemic conditions influencing wound healing (e.g., diabetes, autoimmune disorders)
- Allergy to implant materials
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fayoum university hospital
Al Fayyum, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of ophthalmology fayoum university
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2024
First Posted
October 10, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 31, 2024
Study Completion
July 31, 2024
Last Updated
October 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share