Attitude Towards the Concept of CS on Demand
1 other identifier
observational
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Caesarean section (CS) is a surgical procedure performed to facilitate delivery of the baby through an incision made on the mother's abdomen. Ideally, it is recommended in situations where normal vaginal delivery (VD) can pose risks to either the mother baby or both . In the western world women have only one or two children, while in the East or the Middle East, women are culturally coerced into having many children. Thus, they are more prone to multiple Cesarean deliveries in their lifetime \[1.2\]. ThisAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), since 1985, the acceptable percentage of worldwide C-sections has been 10-15% of all deliveries \[3\]. One of the most critical findings of the American Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that the Cesarean delivery rate has increased from 20.7% in 1995 to 31.6% in 2016 \[4 \]. It is important to mention that Cesarean deliveries are life-saving procedures when there are obstetrical indications.(5.6) Cesarean delivery indications include fetal malpresentation, multiple pregnancies, chorioamnionitis, arrested labour, oligohydramnios, cord prolapse, cephalo-pelvic disorders, and medical diseases such as eclampsia and HELPP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome .the number of patients undergoing Cesarean delivery for non-obstetric reasons has rapidly increased. This could be due to many factors influencing the patients' decisions, including possible fetal outcomes concerning beliefs in some cultures and the convenience of patients and obstetricians(7) .cesarean section on demand allows a woman to choose a cesarean section without a medical reason, based solely on her personal preference Five themes that reflected the reasons for elective cesarian birth without medical indication were identified: (1) fear of vaginal birth process, (2) concerns about future sexual life, (3) need for humanized birth, (4) personal reasons, and (5) decision-making process.(8) raising the awareness of providers about the appropriate indications for CS and the importance of advocating for vaginal delivery among eligible women - including those with a previous CScan trigger practice changes that may reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated caesarean delivery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2025
CompletedOctober 2, 2024
September 1, 2024
6 months
September 29, 2024
September 29, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Women's interest in caesarean section
Questionnaire to inform women about benefits and risks of CS
6 months
Interventions
Attitude towards the concept of CS on demand
Eligibility Criteria
Pregnant women attending the antenatal care clinic of Sohag University hospital
You may qualify if:
- pregnant women attending the antenatal care clinic of Sohag University hospital
You may not qualify if:
- postmenopausal women
- women with previous two or more cs
- women refusing to participate in the questionnaire
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sohag Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Sohag University
Sohag, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Sobande A, Eskandar M. Multiple repeat caesarean sections: complications and outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006 Mar;28(3):193-197. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32105-3.
PMID: 16650356BACKGROUNDBetran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gulmezoglu AM; WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. Epub 2015 Jul 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 26681211BACKGROUNDMartin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer S, Mathews TJ, Wilson EC. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011 Nov 3;60(1):1-70.
PMID: 22670489BACKGROUNDAbbaspoor Z, Moghaddam-Banaem L, Ahmadi F, Kazemnejad A. Iranian mothers' selection of a birth method in the context of perceived norms: a content analysis study. Midwifery. 2014 Jul;30(7):804-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
PMID: 23870747BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Residence at gyn and OBS department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2024
First Posted
October 2, 2024
Study Start
September 28, 2024
Primary Completion
March 30, 2025
Study Completion
September 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09