Orotracheal Intubation with the ORION Videolaryngoscope Versus the King Vision Videolaryngoscope in Adult Patients: ORION Trial
ORION
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the ORION video laryngoscope with the King Vision video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in patients without predictors of difficult airway scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2024
CompletedFebruary 25, 2025
February 1, 2025
14 days
September 24, 2024
February 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful first attempt
Measurement of orotracheal intubations obtained in the first attempt of videolaryngoscopy with the two videolaryngoscopes, successful orotracheal intubation will be corroborated by capnography. Measured in percentage (%).
After the endotracheal intubation completed
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Intubation time
After the endotracheal intubation completed
Laryngeal visualisation measured with the Cormack Lehane scale
After the endotracheal intubation completed
Laryngeal visualisation measured with the POGO scale
After the endotracheal intubation completed
Esophageal intubation
After the endotracheal intubation completed
Complications
After the endotracheal intubation completed
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Videolaryngoscope King Vision
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe King Vision video laryngoscope used in this study has a 45° angulation, with a disposable No. 3 blade and no channel for the orotracheal tube.
Videolaryngoscope ORION
EXPERIMENTALThe ORION video laryngoscope is designed by additive manufacturing, has the same dimensions as a Macintosh No. 3 blade, with 45° angulation, is biocompatible and reusable when subjected to high-level disinfection with 2% Glutaraldehyde for 40 minutes. It has an endoscopic camera fully covered in the body of the videolaryngoscope of 8 mm diameter with 2 megapixels with a resolution of 1280x720, has a viewing angle of 70°, has 6 LEDS with adjustable intensity and the camera has an anti-fogging system and can be connected to any mobile device with Android operating system through a free application. (AN98 Version 2.2.0). It complies with ISO 7376:2020 standards for orotracheal intubation laryngoscopes because its blade withstands a stiffness of more than 60 Newtons and a resistance of more than 150 Newtons.
Interventions
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and sign the informed consent form will be intubated with the ORION or King Vision video laryngoscope according to randomisation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years of age scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia.
- Patients without predictors of difficult airway.
- Patients with ASA I-II classification.
- Patients with BMI less than 35 kg/mts2.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women.
- Patients requiring emergency surgery.
- Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Patients with a history of chronic ischemic heart disease.
- Patients with a history of asthma.
- Patients who have not signed the informed consent to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital General de Mèxico Dr. Eduardo Liceaga
Mexico City, Cuauhtemoc, 06920, Mexico
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juan Fernando Bautista Garcia
Hospital General de Mèxico Dr. Eduardo Liceaga
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2024
First Posted
October 2, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 15, 2024
Study Completion
October 31, 2024
Last Updated
February 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share