NCT06620614

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to compare the intraoperative hemodynamic status, characteristics of block of fractionated versus single bolus dose of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in patient undergoing Transurethral Resection of Prostate(TURP) surgery under Subarachnoid block(SAB). Seventy-two patients aged 50 years and above belonging to American Physical status I and II are divided into two study group. Group B will receive Injection 0.5 % hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 ml single bolus dose and group F will receive same concentration and volume of hyperbaric bupivacaine with two third dose initially (i.e. 1.6 ml) and remaining one third dose (i.e. 0.9 ml) after 60 seconds at the rate of 0.2ml/sec.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 20, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 8, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 20, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 4, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Fractionated DoseHeavy BupivacaineSpinal Anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Comparision of mean arterial pressure(MAP) in both participants with subarachnoid block

    Hypotension was defined when mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased ≤20% from baseline.

    Throughout study completion,an average of 3 months

  • Comparision of heart rate in both participants with subarachnoid block

    Bradycardia was defined when heart rate is less than 60 beats per minute.

    Throughout study completion,an average of 3 months

  • Comparision of total consumption of vasopressors used during intraoperative period between the groups.

    Injection Mephentermine 6mg iv was given for hypotension

    Throughout study completion,an average of 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Comparision of time for onset of sensory between the groups.

    Throughout study completion,an average of 3 months.

  • Comparision of time for onset of motor block between the groups

    Throughout study completion,an average of 3 months.

  • Comparision of the time of regression of sensory block between two groups.

    Throughout study completion,an average of 3 months

  • Comparision of the time of regression motor block between two groups.

    Throughout study completion,an average of 3 months.

  • Comparision of adverse effects like nausea, vomiting and shivering between the groups

    Throughout study completion,an average of 3 months.

Study Arms (2)

Fractionated group arm

EXPERIMENTAL

In this group ,participants are given 1.6 ml of Injection Heavy Bupivacaine 0.5% initially followed by 0.9ml after 60 seconds at a rate of 0.2ml/hr.

Combination Product: 0.5% Heavy Bupivacaine

Bolus arm group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

In this group ,participants are given Injection Heavy Bupivacaine 0.5% 2.5ml bolus at a rate of 0.2ml/hr

Combination Product: 0.5% Heavy Bupivacaine

Interventions

0.5% Heavy BupivacaineCOMBINATION_PRODUCT

There are two groups.

Also known as: 26 G Quincke's needle
Bolus arm groupFractionated group arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsAll male participants from 50 years and above
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: 50 years and above patients undergoing TURP surgery under SAB
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status: I and II.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with history of uncontrolled hypertension.
  • Patients with previous history of cerebrovascular accidents.
  • Patients with history of spinal deformity.
  • Patients with known allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Patient with Infection at site of injection.
  • Patient with history of coagulopathy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital

Kathmandu, +977, Nepal

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Nash J. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: prevalence and diagnosis. GM Journal. 2010;40:321-4

    BACKGROUND
  • Persu C, Georgescu D, Arabagiu I, Cauni V, Moldoveanu C, Geavlete P. TURP for BPH. How large is too large? J Med Life. 2010 Oct-Dec;3(4):376-80.

    PMID: 21254734BACKGROUND
  • Bhattacharyya S, Bisai S, Biswas H, Tiwary MK, Mallik S, Saha SM. Regional anesthesia in transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) surgery: A comparative study between saddle block and subarachnoid block. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(3):268-71. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.158497.

    PMID: 26240544BACKGROUND
  • Gandhi M, Kabir KK, Arora KK, Tiwari K. Comparative study between fractionated and single bolus dose of local anaesthetic in elective lower segment caeserean section. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2019;6(3):386-90

    BACKGROUND
  • Kararmaz A, Kaya S, Turhanoglu S, Ozyilmaz MA. Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anaesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy. Anaesthesia. 2003 Jun;58(6):526-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03153.x.

    PMID: 12846615BACKGROUND
  • Beed M. Anaesthesia for gynaecological and genitourinary surgery. In: Aitkenhead A, Thompson J, Rowbotham D, Moppett I, editors. Smith and Aitkenhead's Textbook of Anaesthesia. 6 th edition. London: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2013. p. 568-77

    BACKGROUND
  • Puri N, Talwar A. Comparative Study of Ephedrine and Mephertermine in Treatment of Hypotension in Patients Undergoing Elective Trans Urethral Resection Prostate (TURP). Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons. 2010;28(1):10-6

    BACKGROUND
  • Favarel-Garrigues JF, Sztark F, Petitjean ME, Thicoipe M, Lassie P, Dabadie P. Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia in the elderly: single dose versus titration through a catheter. Anesth Analg. 1996 Feb;82(2):312-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199602000-00017.

    PMID: 8561333BACKGROUND
  • Nugroho AM, Sugiarto A, Chandra S, Lembahmanah L, Septica RI, Yuneva A. A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension. Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 6;9(1):e85115. doi: 10.5812/aapm-85115. eCollection 2019 Feb.

    PMID: 30881909BACKGROUND
  • Norris MC. Neuraxial anaesthesia. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC, Ortega R, Sharar SM, Holt NF, editors. Clinical Anaesthesia. 8 thedition. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer; 2017. p. 914-44.

    BACKGROUND
  • Brull R, Macfarlane AJ, Chan VW. Spinal, epidural, and caudal anaesthesia. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller's anaesthesia. 8 th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders;2015. p. 1684-720.

    BACKGROUND
  • Badheka JP, Oza VP, Vyas A, Baria D, Nehra P, Babu T. Comparison of fractionated dose versus bolus dose injection in spinal anaesthesia for patients undergoing elective caesarean section: A randomised, double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Jan;61(1):55-60. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.198390.

    PMID: 28216705BACKGROUND
  • Ramasali M.V., Vankaylapatti S. D., Appagalla S, Kulkarni D. K., Pasupuleti S. A Prospective Randomised Double-Blind Comparative Study of Bolus versus Fractionated Dose Injection in Spinal Anaesthesia for Pregnant Women undergoing elective Caesarean Section. Indian J Anesth Anal 2018; 5(11):1840-45

    BACKGROUND
  • Derakhshan P, Faiz SHR, Rahimzadeh P, Salehi R, Khaef G. A Comparison of the Effect of Fractionated and Bolus Dose Injection on Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug 23;10(5):e102228. doi: 10.5812/aapm.102228. eCollection 2020 Oct.

    PMID: 34150559BACKGROUND
  • Kaniyil S, Priya PG, Nithinkumar MP, Sneha SR. Fractional spinal anaesthesia in high-risk elderly patients for orthopaedic surgery - Case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;67(7):651-654. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_888_22. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

    PMID: 37601939BACKGROUND
  • Tiwari K, Masar R. Comparison Between Fractionated and Single Bolus Dose of Local Anaesthetic (Bupivacaine 0.5% Heavy) in Elective Lower Segment Caeserean Section. Int. J. Health Clin. Res. 2020; 3(6):36-42

    BACKGROUND
  • Srivastava N, Ahluwalia P, Jheetay GS, Singh G. Bolus dose versus fractionated dose injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia among adult patients undergoing lower limb surgery: A prospective study. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2020;7(2):238-44

    BACKGROUND
  • Hossain MM, Biswas B, Mohanta PK, Hassan MM, Basu P, Islam F. Comparison between fractionated dose with bolus dose in Spinal Anaesthesia for haemodynamic stability and duration of analgesia in patients undergoing elective Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS). Mediscope. 2020 Sep 29;7(2):95-102

    BACKGROUND
  • Sowmya NL. Comparison of Fractionated versus Bolus Dose Injection of Drug in Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Surgeries. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2020;Vol 9

    BACKGROUND
  • Mahbuba S, Chy MM, Naz S, Begum M, Jahan SS, Sheikh ZA. Comparison of sensory and motor block outcome of fractionated versus single bolus dose administration of hyperbaric bupivacaine in elective cesarean section. Medico Research Chronicles. 2021 ;8(4):317-24

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Hyperplasia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostatic DiseasesGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Pusparaj Poudel, MD

    Bir Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: An approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), NAMS was taken prior to commencing the study. 72 Patients of ASA physical status I or II scheduled for Transurethral Resection of prostate under Sub-arachnoid block were enrolled in the study. . Patient's characteristics including name, gender, age, body weight, height and body mass index were recorded. Patients were kept nil per oral as per American society of anesthesiologist guidelines prior to surgery. Study pouplation were divided into two groups: * Bolus group * Fractionated group
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2024

First Posted

October 1, 2024

Study Start

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion

December 1, 2022

Study Completion

December 1, 2023

Last Updated

October 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations