A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Rate of Antibiotic Infusion
Comparing the Rate of Antibiotic Infusion Among Patients with Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Bacterial Infections in the Emergency Department -- a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
11,900
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute upper respiratory tract infection, commonly known as upper respiratory infection, is an acute inflammation primarily affecting the nose, pharynx, or larynx caused by various viruses and/or bacteria. Viruses are more common, accounting for 70% to 80% of cases, while bacterial infections account for 20% to 30%. For a long time, the high rate of intravenous infusion use has been a prominent issue in clinical diagnosis and treatment in China. The irrational and excessive use of antimicrobials in emergency patients with upper respiratory tract bacterial infections has also become increasingly apparent, imposing unnecessary financial burdens and risks of drug side effects on patients. Therefore, reducing the rate of intravenous antimicrobial administration in emergency patients with upper respiratory tract bacterial infections has become an urgent problem to be solved. By implementing measures such as health education by clinical pharmacists and enhancing the awareness of rational antimicrobial use in doctors, it is expected to lower the rate of intravenous antimicrobial administration, reduce the occurrence of drug resistance, improve treatment convenience for patients, and lower treatment costs while ensuring therapeutic efficacy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether clinical pharmacists can reduce the intravenous infusion rate of antimicrobials in emergency patients with upper respiratory tract bacterial infections through medication education for emergency medical staff and to observe whether this intervention will affect the prognosis and medication safety of these patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2025
CompletedOctober 1, 2024
September 1, 2024
5 months
September 27, 2024
September 29, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Infusion rate of antibacterial drugs in patients with bacterial infection of upper respiratory tract
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Disease maintenance
Within 14 days after enrolment
Adverse drug reaction
Within 14 days after enrolment
Disease recurrence within a 14 days period
Within 14 days after enrolment
Disease recurrence within a 14 days period
Within 14 days after enrolment
Worsening of disease within a 14 days period
Within 14 days after enrolment
Study Arms (2)
Pharmacist medication education group
EXPERIMENTALPharmacists give emergency doctors medication education every month about how to use antibiotic infusion reasonably
No pharmacists' education on antibiotics
NO INTERVENTIONFollowing routine clinical practices, with no pharmacists' education on rational use of antibiotics
Interventions
* Training: Train emergency doctors every month on how to use antibiotic infusion reasonably; The prescription, cancellation, or method of use of antibiotics is decided by doctors. * Implementation of intervention cards: When the C-reactive protein (CRP) of patients is exceed 10mg/L, the doctor should determine whether to use antibiotics based on the clinical status of patients. * Promotion: Promote reasonably use of intravenous antibiotics through public accounts and posters. * Patient education: Distribute educational flyers to patients about how to use antibiotics reasonably.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with upper respiratory tract infections seeking emergency medical attention;
- Patients with laboratory tests indicating White Blood Cell (WBC) \>10×10\^9/L or White Blood Cell (CRP) ≥ 10.0mg/L, requiring the use of antimicrobial agents;
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years; ④ Patients with at least one of the following local signs and symptoms: (1) fever, (2) cough, (3) rhinitis (sneezing, nasal congestion, or rhinorrhea), (4) pharyngitis (sore throat), (5) shortness of breath, (6) wheezing, (7) chest pain, (8) abnormal auscultation findings.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with other infections in addition to upper respiratory tract infections; ② Patients who require hospitalization or treatment in a higher-level medical institution as assessed by medical professionals;
- Patients who cannot take oral medications or have severe gastrointestinal dysfunction; ④ Special patients, including those with neutropenia, bone marrow suppression, during radiochemotherapy, undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients, patients with congenital immune deficiency, pregnant patients, and patients with mental illnesses.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Haibin Dai, Professor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Because of the nature of the intervention, masking of doctors and participants was not possible, but telephone follow-up staff and data analysts were masked to allocation group until after the definitive analysis was done.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2024
First Posted
October 1, 2024
Study Start
November 18, 2024
Primary Completion
April 17, 2025
Study Completion
April 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09