NCT06620211

Brief Summary

An observational, multicenter study with retrospective recruitment and two data collection methods, one retrospective (medical records) and the other prospective (questionnaires). Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and have none of the non-inclusion criteria will be selected using the computer database of each investigating center. Data from consultation visits and surgery data will be collected and filled in the observation books. The patient will be contacted by the investigators to collect data on quality of life and the existence or absence of pain associated with implant placement at follow-up.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
290

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 23, 2020

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 19, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 19, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

December 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • RATE AND TYPE OF REINTERVENTION

    safety assessment of Sacromesh® implan through the documentation, within the French healthcare context, of the rate and type of re-interventions after Sacromesh® implantation. Collection and documentation of the nature and frequency of reinterventions after placement of the Sacromesh® device, including causes and nature of eventual explants, be it total or partial. The rate of re intervention will be calculated using Yes/No answer to POP recurrence question in the CRF. Yes answer to the question will be considered as a re intervention. In case of any POP recurrence investigator was asked to fill an adverse event form to describe the re intervention. Type of re intervention will be derived from AE form into a two classes categorical variable taking either 'De novo prolapse (recurrence, vaginal extrusion)' or 'Other' value. Both rate of re intervention and type of re intervention will be described as qualitative variables.

    2020 - 2023

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • evaluation the tolerance of the Sacromesh® implant Rate and type of postoperative complications

    2020 - 2023

  • evaluation the tolerance of the Sacromesh® implant qol

    2020 - 2023

  • evaluation the tolerance of the Sacromesh® implant postoperative pain

    2020 - 2023

Interventions

Patient who underwent surgery to place the Sacromesh® medical device (promontofixation) for a prolapse cure, between 2009 and 2018

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsProlapse cure, female only
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

SCUPP is an observational retrospective study without any planed comparison. This is a multicentric study and from the center with the best recruitment potential, 5 centers were selected. The primary endpoint is the rate of reoperation which is expected to be very small according to previous investigation for Sacromesh® and according to literature. For example, a study investigated perioperative and mid-term clinical outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) with light titanium-coated polypropylene (TCP) mesh in a large group of patients affected by International Continence Society stage II-IV pelvic organ prolapse (POP) reported a posterior recurrence of about 0.4% (1 out of 217 patients) \[Campagna et al., 2020\]. Another study investigating the Robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSCP) option for the treatment of apical, anterior, and proximal posterior compartment pelvic organ prolapses reported a POP recurrence of about 2% (2 out of 91 patients) \[Li Marzi et al., 2022\].

You may qualify if:

  • Patient who underwent surgery to place the Sacromesh® medical device for a prolapse cure, between 2009 and 2018 in one of the investigation centres participating in the study.
  • Patient who has read the information note and has not formulated an -opposition.
  • Adult patient with full mental capacity/capability

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient with an adjacent pathology that may strongly interfere with her quality of life and VAS score.
  • Patients with mental psychological pathology

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cousin Biotech

Wervicq-Sud, 59117, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2023

First Posted

October 1, 2024

Study Start

April 23, 2020

Primary Completion

October 19, 2023

Study Completion

October 19, 2023

Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Locations