NCT06618599

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare efficacy of Mid-transverse process to pleura block combined with erector spinae block versus paravertebral plane block in cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy surgeries.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable lung-cancer

Timeline
1mo left

Started Oct 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress96%
Oct 2024Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2024

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 18, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

September 26, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 16, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • visual analogue score changes during rest and cough for the three groups.

    the score of visual analogue score, with minimum score of 0 and maximum of 10, with higher scores meaning more severe pain

    for 24 hours postoperative

Study Arms (2)

Group 1:midtransverse to pleura block combined with erector spinae block

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received ipsilateral Ultrasound guided midtransverse block with injection of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% and ipsilateral Ultrasound guided ESPB block with injection of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%

Procedure: Mid-transverse process to pleura block combined with erector spinae block

Group 2: paravertebral block

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received ipsilateral Ultrasound guided paravertebral plane block with injection of 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25%.

Procedure: paravertebral block

Interventions

The probe will be placed vertically 3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process and the transverse process will be identified. The needle will be introduced in an in-plane fashion until the tip lay deep in the erector spinae muscle. One milliliter of normal saline will be injected to confirm the correct needle tip position by visualizing the spread under the erector spinae muscle. 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected .The needle will be directed aiming for the midpoint between the transverse process and pleura from cephalad to caudad. One milliliter of normal saline will be given to confirm the position of the needle tip, then a total of 20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine will be injected

Group 1:midtransverse to pleura block combined with erector spinae block

the transducer will be positioned laterally 3 cm to the midline at T5 spinous process, defining the spinous process, pleura, transverse process, the paravertebral (PV) space, and superior costotransverse ligament. The trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae muscles will be recognized as superficial to the hyperechoic transverse process shadow. However, when the rhomboid major muscle disappeared, this indicated that we will be at the 7th thoracic vertebra's level. Local infiltration using 2-3 mL of 2.0% lignocaine will be done. A spinal 22-gauge needle will be injected at the cephalic side of the transducer using an in-plane technique, and the needle directed towards the costotransverse ligament (CTL). The passage of the needle through the CTL will be associated with a pop, informing that the superior costotransverse ligament will be passed. Following a 3 mL testing dose of normal saline containing epinephrine (1:200,000), 30 mL bupivacaine 0.25% injected.

Group 2: paravertebral block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • lung cancer patients for thoracotomy surgeries.
  • Physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA )II, III.
  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 Years.
  • Body mass index (BMI): \> 20 kg/m2 and \< 35 kg/m2

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal
  • physical status ASA IV,
  • Age \<18 years or \>65 years
  • BMI \< 20 kg/m2 and \>35 kg/m2
  • Known sensitivity or contraindication to drug used in the study (local anesthetics, opioids).
  • History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain.
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia e.g., local sepsis, pre- existing peripheral neuropathies, and coagulopathy.
  • Severe respiratory, cardiac, hepatic or renal disease.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cairo University

Cairo, 11835, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Zengin M, Alagoz A. Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Thoracic Paravertebral Block Applications in the Treatment of Acute Pain After Thoracotomy in Geriatric Patients. Cureus. 2021 Oct 22;13(10):e18982. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18982. eCollection 2021 Oct.

    PMID: 34820237BACKGROUND
  • Rawal N. Current issues in postoperative pain management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;33(3):160-71. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000366.

    PMID: 26509324BACKGROUND
  • Liu L, Ni XX, Zhang LW, Zhao K, Xie H, Zhu J. Effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia and plasma cytokine levels after uniportal VATS: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2021 Feb;35(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02848-x. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

    PMID: 32886200BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • sayed M Abed

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

sayed M abed, MD degree

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
double blind
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Group 1: received ipsilateral Ultrasound guided midtransverse block and ipsilateral Ultrasound guided ESPB block Group 2: paravertebral block(PVB): Patients received ipsilateral Ultrasound guided paravertebral plane block .
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2024

First Posted

October 1, 2024

Study Start

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 18, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

starting from march 2025

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
basal
Access Criteria
web

Locations