Mid-transverse Process Combined With Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block
Analgesic Effect of Mid-transverse Process to Pleura Block Combined With Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block in Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare efficacy of Mid-transverse process to pleura block combined with erector spinae block versus paravertebral plane block in cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy surgeries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Oct 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedMarch 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.6 years
September 26, 2024
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
visual analogue score changes during rest and cough for the three groups.
the score of visual analogue score, with minimum score of 0 and maximum of 10, with higher scores meaning more severe pain
for 24 hours postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Group 1:midtransverse to pleura block combined with erector spinae block
EXPERIMENTALPatients received ipsilateral Ultrasound guided midtransverse block with injection of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% and ipsilateral Ultrasound guided ESPB block with injection of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%
Group 2: paravertebral block
EXPERIMENTALPatients received ipsilateral Ultrasound guided paravertebral plane block with injection of 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25%.
Interventions
The probe will be placed vertically 3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process and the transverse process will be identified. The needle will be introduced in an in-plane fashion until the tip lay deep in the erector spinae muscle. One milliliter of normal saline will be injected to confirm the correct needle tip position by visualizing the spread under the erector spinae muscle. 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected .The needle will be directed aiming for the midpoint between the transverse process and pleura from cephalad to caudad. One milliliter of normal saline will be given to confirm the position of the needle tip, then a total of 20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine will be injected
the transducer will be positioned laterally 3 cm to the midline at T5 spinous process, defining the spinous process, pleura, transverse process, the paravertebral (PV) space, and superior costotransverse ligament. The trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae muscles will be recognized as superficial to the hyperechoic transverse process shadow. However, when the rhomboid major muscle disappeared, this indicated that we will be at the 7th thoracic vertebra's level. Local infiltration using 2-3 mL of 2.0% lignocaine will be done. A spinal 22-gauge needle will be injected at the cephalic side of the transducer using an in-plane technique, and the needle directed towards the costotransverse ligament (CTL). The passage of the needle through the CTL will be associated with a pop, informing that the superior costotransverse ligament will be passed. Following a 3 mL testing dose of normal saline containing epinephrine (1:200,000), 30 mL bupivacaine 0.25% injected.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- lung cancer patients for thoracotomy surgeries.
- Physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA )II, III.
- Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 Years.
- Body mass index (BMI): \> 20 kg/m2 and \< 35 kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- physical status ASA IV,
- Age \<18 years or \>65 years
- BMI \< 20 kg/m2 and \>35 kg/m2
- Known sensitivity or contraindication to drug used in the study (local anesthetics, opioids).
- History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain.
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia e.g., local sepsis, pre- existing peripheral neuropathies, and coagulopathy.
- Severe respiratory, cardiac, hepatic or renal disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Cairo University
Cairo, 11835, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Zengin M, Alagoz A. Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Thoracic Paravertebral Block Applications in the Treatment of Acute Pain After Thoracotomy in Geriatric Patients. Cureus. 2021 Oct 22;13(10):e18982. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18982. eCollection 2021 Oct.
PMID: 34820237BACKGROUNDRawal N. Current issues in postoperative pain management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;33(3):160-71. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000366.
PMID: 26509324BACKGROUNDLiu L, Ni XX, Zhang LW, Zhao K, Xie H, Zhu J. Effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia and plasma cytokine levels after uniportal VATS: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2021 Feb;35(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02848-x. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
PMID: 32886200BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
sayed M Abed
Cairo University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- double blind
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2024
First Posted
October 1, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- basal
- Access Criteria
- web
starting from march 2025