NCT06617780

Brief Summary

The study examines whether there are radiological criteria that can give an indication if a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture remains stable without the needs for surgery after closed reduction in patients between 18 and 65 years of age.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
212

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
11mo left

Started Oct 2024

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress64%
Oct 2024Apr 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 27, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 7, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 7, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 26, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Wrist FracturesDistal Forearm Fractures

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Radiological criterias 3 months after fracture

    Whitch of the pre-defined radiological criterias (with a focus on dorsal comminution and volar hook) measured on x-ray before and after closed reduction can predict alignment 3 months after fracture

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • CT criterias

    1 day after the fracture is reduced

  • How osteoporosis/osteopenia may affect instability in the age group 50-65

    1 year

Study Arms (1)

Patients with a distal radius fracture

Dorsally displaced distal radius fractures reduced to an acceptable position in patients aged 18-65 years.

Radiation: X-ray (wrist)after 3 months and CT (wrist) the day after closed reduction

Interventions

One addition x-ray and on addition CT scan of the wrist

Patients with a distal radius fracture

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients at the outpatient clinic at the Ortopedic department, Oslo University Hospital, UllevĂ¥l, with a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture, aged 18-65 years, reduced to an acceptable postition, included in a 2 year period (oct 2024 - oct 2026).

You may qualify if:

  • years old, living in Oslo/surroundings (available for follow-up)
  • AO class A2/3 or C1/C2 fractures
  • Dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius (minimum VLDV more than100 or ulnar variance more than 2 mm compared to healthy side before reduction) with or without PSU fracture
  • Reduced to an acceptable position (VLDV 75-95 degrees, RIV more than 15 degrees, ulnar variance more than 2 mm, step/diastasis in the joint surface less than 2 mm)
  • Exclution criterias:
  • Volar comminution (AO A3.3), step/diastasis more than 2 mm before reduction
  • Ad latus more than 2 cortex widths after reduction
  • Bilateral fractures
  • Open fractures
  • Previous wrist fracture in adulthood
  • Still open growth disc on X-ray
  • Antebrachium or carpal fracture
  • Ligament damage in the root of the hand or DRUJ
  • Lack of compliance (dementia, psychiatry/drug abuse, etc.)
  • Language problems
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oslo University Hospital, Aker, Oslo Skadelegevakt

Oslo, Oslo County, 0587, Norway

RECRUITING

Related Publications (25)

  • McQueen M, Caspers J. Colles fracture: does the anatomical result affect the final function? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Aug;70(4):649-51. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B4.3403617.

    PMID: 3403617BACKGROUND
  • Cooney WP. Management of Colles' fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 1989 May;14(2):137-9. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681_89_90112-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 2746109BACKGROUND
  • Egol KA, Walsh M, Romo-Cardoso S, Dorsky S, Paksima N. Distal radial fractures in the elderly: operative compared with nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 4;92(9):1851-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00968.

    PMID: 20686059BACKGROUND
  • Hassellund SS, Williksen JH, Laane MM, Pripp A, Rosales CP, Karlsen O, Madsen JE, Frihagen F. Cast immobilization is non-inferior to volar locking plates in relation to QuickDASH after one year in patients aged 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial of displaced distal radius fractures. Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):247-255. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0192.R2.

    PMID: 33517725BACKGROUND
  • Panigrahi TK, Ray S, Mallik M, Maharaj RC, Khatua J, Nanda DP. Determining the Borderline Anatomical Parameters for Better Functional Outcome of Colles Fracture: A Prospective Study. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 May 5;57(4):619-628. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726062. eCollection 2022 Aug.

    PMID: 35966419BACKGROUND
  • Arora R, Gabl M, Erhart S, Schmidle G, Dallapozza C, Lutz M. Aspects of current management of distal radius fractures in the elderly individuals. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2011 Sep;2(5-6):187-94. doi: 10.1177/2151458511426874.

    PMID: 23569689BACKGROUND
  • Earnshaw SA, Aladin A, Surendran S, Moran CG. Closed reduction of colles fractures: comparison of manual manipulation and finger-trap traction: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Mar;84(3):354-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200203000-00004.

    PMID: 11886903BACKGROUND
  • Mackenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R. Prediction of instability in distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Sep;88(9):1944-51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02520.

    PMID: 16951109BACKGROUND
  • Chung SR, Chung KC. Recognizing and Treating Unique Distal Radius Fracture Patterns that are Prone to Displacement. Hand Clin. 2023 Aug;39(3):279-293. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

    PMID: 37453757BACKGROUND
  • Selles CA, Mulders MAM, Winkelhagen J, van Eerten PV, Goslings JC, Schep NWL; VIPAR Collaborators. Volar Plate Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization in Acceptably Reduced Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Nov 3;103(21):1963-1969. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01344.

    PMID: 34314402BACKGROUND
  • Lafontaine M, Hardy D, Delince P. Stability assessment of distal radius fractures. Injury. 1989 Jul;20(4):208-10. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90113-7.

    PMID: 2592094BACKGROUND
  • Nesbitt KS, Failla JM, Les C. Assessment of instability factors in adult distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Nov;29(6):1128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.06.008.

    PMID: 15576227BACKGROUND
  • Abbaszadegan H, Jonsson U, von Sivers K. Prediction of instability of Colles' fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989 Dec;60(6):646-50. doi: 10.3109/17453678909149595.

    PMID: 2624083BACKGROUND
  • Tahririan MA, Javdan M, Nouraei MH, Dehghani M. Evaluation of instability factors in distal radius fractures. J Res Med Sci. 2013 Oct;18(10):892-6.

    PMID: 24497862BACKGROUND
  • Hove LM, Solheim E, Skjeie R, Sorensen FK. Prediction of secondary displacement in Colles' fracture. J Hand Surg Br. 1994 Dec;19(6):731-6. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90247-x.

    PMID: 7706876BACKGROUND
  • Leone J, Bhandari M, Adili A, McKenzie S, Moro JK, Dunlop RB. Predictors of early and late instability following conservative treatment of extra-articular distal radius fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Jan;124(1):38-41. doi: 10.1007/s00402-003-0597-6. Epub 2003 Nov 8.

    PMID: 14608466BACKGROUND
  • Walenkamp MM, Aydin S, Mulders MA, Goslings JC, Schep NW. Predictors of unstable distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Jun;41(5):501-15. doi: 10.1177/1753193415604795. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

    PMID: 26420817BACKGROUND
  • Lutz M, Arora R, Krappinger D, Wambacher M, Rieger M, Pechlaner S. Arthritis predicting factors in distal intraarticular radius fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Aug;131(8):1121-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1211-3. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

    PMID: 21161253BACKGROUND
  • Cross GWV, Saini RS, Monem M, Sofat R. Analysis of Our Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults: Are We Over Operating? J Wrist Surg. 2021 Jul 2;11(1):48-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731384. eCollection 2022 Feb.

    PMID: 35127264BACKGROUND
  • LaMartina J, Jawa A, Stucken C, Merlin G, Tornetta P 3rd. Predicting alignment after closed reduction and casting of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 May;40(5):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.023. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

    PMID: 25772286BACKGROUND
  • Phillips AR, Al-Shawi A. Restoration of the volar cortex: predicting instability after manipulation of distal radial fractures. Injury. 2014 Dec;45(12):1896-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.007.

    PMID: 25441173BACKGROUND
  • Rozental TD, Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ. Functional outcome and complications following two types of dorsal plating for unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct;85(10):1956-60. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200310000-00014.

    PMID: 14563804BACKGROUND
  • Medoff RJ. Essential radiographic evaluation for distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2005 Aug;21(3):279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2005.02.008.

    PMID: 16039439BACKGROUND
  • Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Angst J. The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

    PMID: 27986610BACKGROUND
  • McCreary DL, Sandberg BC, Bohn DC, Parikh HR, Cunningham BP. Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Results: Is One Minimum Clinically Important Difference Really Enough? Hand (N Y). 2020 May;15(3):360-364. doi: 10.1177/1558944718812180. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

    PMID: 30461316BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wrist Fractures

Interventions

X-Rays

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wrist InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, Bone

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electromagnetic RadiationElectromagnetic PhenomenaMagnetic PhenomenaPhysical PhenomenaRadiationRadiation, Ionizing

Study Officials

  • Lene B. Solberg, PhD MD

    Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Lene B. Solberg, PhD MD

CONTACT

Ingrid Oftebro, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior physician and postdoctoral fellow, Orthopedic Department, Oslo University Hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2024

First Posted

September 27, 2024

Study Start

October 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 7, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The Norwegian law does not allow us to share IPD without a specific approval from the Regional Ethical Commitee (REC). If someone would like us to share IPD, we will consider to send an application to REC for this.

Locations