SPENDD: Quantitative Sensory Testing and Analgesic Response for Painful Peripheral Neuropathy.
Sensory Phenotyping to Enhance Neuropathic Pain Drug Development (SPENDD): A Randomized, Double-blinded Cross-over Clinical Trial Aimed at Investigating Whether Bedside Quantitative Sensory Testing Can Predict Response to Analgesics.
1 other identifier
interventional
190
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether quantitative sensory testing (QST) can be used to classify participants into pain sub-groups and predict who will respond best to certain pain treatments in participants with painful peripheral neuropathy. The analgesic effect is evaluated by measuring pain intensity and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). This study is a 3-period cross-over trial. This means researchers will compare 3 different drugs (pregabalin, duloxetine, and placebo) over a period of 19 weeks. Participants will:
- Undergo a quantitative sensory testing (QST) exam.
- Provide a blood sample.
- Complete questionnaires on the computer.
- Take the study drug as instructed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2026
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
April 23, 2026
February 1, 2026
2.3 years
September 23, 2024
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Intensity
Pain intensity will be measured using the following question: "Please rate your worst pain over the past day on a scale from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable). The primary outcome will be the mean of 7 daily worst pain ratings. It will be assessed during the baseline week of each period (i.e., week before randomization and the last week of each washout period) and during the 4th week of treatment in each period.
From enrollment to end of treatment period at 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
PGIC
From enrollment to end of treatment period at 4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Period 1 - Placebo, Placebo, Duloxetine, Duloxetine, Pregabalin, Pregabalin
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be randomized to 1 of the 6 possible treatment sequences
Period 2 - Duloxetine, Pregabalin, Placebo, Pregabalin, Duloxetine, Placebo
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be randomized to 1 of the 6 possible treatment sequences
Period 3 - Pregabalin, Duloxetine, Pregabalin, Placebo, Placebo, Duloxetine
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be randomized to 1 of the 6 possible treatment sequences
Interventions
300mg/day pregabalin capsule
60mg/day duloxetine capsule
Placebo capsule
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Between 18 and 80 years old (inclusive).
- Have a diagnosis of peripheral neuropathic pain in both feet from generalized distal sensory polyneuropathy based on the following criteria
- A history of a relevant lesion of the peripheral nervous system, disease, toxic exposure, or no known cause (i.e., idiopathic).
- Pain distribution in a neuroanatomically plausible distribution consistent with a symmetrical generalized polyneuropathy (i.e., with a "glove and stocking" distal to proximal gradient).
- DN4 score≥ 4
- Have experienced the neuropathic pain in the feet for at least 6 months.
- Have at least one of the following sensory signs upon clinical examination: abnormal pinprick perception, allodynia, hyperalgesia, abnormal light touch perception, abnormal vibratory perception, or abnormal proprioception.
- Have average daily baseline worst pain intensity in their feet of 4 or greater and less than 10, on a 0-10 numeric rating scale of pain intensity (0 = "no pain," 10= "most intense pain imaginable") as measured on the daily diary during screening from at least 5 measurements.
- Able to understand and read English. This requirement is to ensure that participants can provide informed consent and complete PROs.
- Have been on stable dosages of all pain medications or using all non-pharmacologic treatments for neuropathy pain at consistent frequency for at least 1 month and willing and able to stay on those dosages (or use those frequencies) (except acetaminophen rescue) throughout the duration of the study.
- If taking cannabinoid products for any reason, must be at stable dosages for at least 1 month prior to the screening visit and willing to stay on that dosage for the duration of the study.
- Willing and able to complete electronic patient-reported outcomes at home using a REDCap link.
- Taking any opioid medication with a daily mean morphine equivalent (MME) of \> 30.
- Have a different diagnosis of pain in the feet including but not limited to musculoskeletal pain (e.g., foot arthritis, plantar fasciitis) or lumbar sacral radiculopathy that they rate to be worse than their neuropathic pain in their feet, or that in the opinion of the investigator, precludes the participant from rating their neuropathy pain in their feet.
- Have a central cause of neuropathic pain (e.g., demyelinating disease, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease).
- +25 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Rochesterlead
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for Autonomic and Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14618, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont, 05401, United States
VCU Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Gewandter, PhD, MPH
University of Rochester
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study will be double-blinded, that is, the participants, study staff, and statisticians will be blinded to the treatment assignments until the study data are locked and primary analyses have been performed. Unblinding of individual treatment sequence during the study is discouraged. However, the PI at a site may break the blind for a subject in the event of a medical emergency, where knowledge of the subject's treatment sequence must be known in order to facilitate appropriate emergency medical treatment.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2024
First Posted
September 26, 2024
Study Start
January 29, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02